Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Mazda Bongo MOT Results

Registered in 2005
72.1% pass rate
from 272 tests in 2020
(47% better than other 2005 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Mazda Bongo is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (38% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 7.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 7.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.37% fail on Switch
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp (60% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (69% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.5% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.37% fail on Horn
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (73% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.74% fail on Direction indicators (79% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Flashing type (79% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.74% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.37% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 6.6% fail on Suspension (69% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (72% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 1.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (77% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.37% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 4.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.4% fail on Spark ignition (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 4.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.37% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.7% fail on Visibility (64% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Wipers (64% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.37% fail on Driver's view
  • 3.3% fail on Brakes (82% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.37% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.37% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.37% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.37% fail on Lever
    • 1.8% fail on Brake performance (83% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (73% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (73% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.74% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.37% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.37% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.37% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.37% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.37% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 3.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (75% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.1% fail on Doors
      • 1.1% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 1.1% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.74% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.37% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.37% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
  • 2.6% fail on Tyres (62% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.74% fail on Condition
  • 2.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.74% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.37% fail on Attachment
      • 0.37% fail on Requirements
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
    • 0.37% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.8% fail on Steering (71% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end