MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Mazda » Bongo » 2009

Mazda Bongo MOT Results

Registered in 2009
51.2% pass rate
from 545 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Mazda Bongo is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Suspension (43% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 11% fail on Anti-roll bars (74% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Pins and bushes (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.1% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (18 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.73% fail on Linkage
      • 0.55% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.18% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 6.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes (83% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.92% fail on Springs (81% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.18% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.73% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.73% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.73% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.55% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 9.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 9.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamps (59% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Headlamp (68% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Electrical equipment (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Battery(ies) (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp (55% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.37% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (63% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.55% fail on Direction indicators (79% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Flashing type (79% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.55% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.37% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.37% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.37% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (7 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (9 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.18% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.18% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (78% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.18% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 6.1% fail on Exhaust system (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Chassis condition (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Transmission
      • 2.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.4% fail on Joints
      • 0.18% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.18% fail on Bearing housing
    • 1.3% fail on Body
      • 0.92% fail on Panel (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Other body component
    • 0.55% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.37% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.37% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.18% fail on Seats
      • 0.18% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 6.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.55% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.18% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.18% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (78% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (80% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.55% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.37% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.37% fail on Rbt (83% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.18% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.18% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 3.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.92% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.92% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (70% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 9.9% fail on Visibility
    • 7.2% fail on Wipers (77% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.18% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.18% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.0% fail on Spark ignition (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 4.4% fail on Catalyst emissions (30 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.55% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 1.5% fail on Compression ignition (72% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.73% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.37% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (83% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.18% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.55% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.37% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.18% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.18% fail on Other leaks
  • 6.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Seat belts (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.4% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.37% fail on Requirements
    • 0.37% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 5.7% fail on Steering
    • 2.8% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Steering linkage components (56% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end (57% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.92% fail on Power steering
      • 0.55% fail on Other components
      • 0.37% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.37% fail on Steering coupling (17 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Universal joint (22 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.6% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
  • 0.92% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.92% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.37% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.37% fail on Attachment