Mazda BT-50 MOT Results
Registered in 200869.4% pass rate
from 373 tests in 2017
(31% better than other 2008 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 vans and highlighted areas where the Mazda BT-50 is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(26% better than other 2008 vans)
-
7.2% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.4% fail on Front lamps
- 1.9% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.27% fail on All position lamps
- 7.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 4.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.2% fail on Fog lamp
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (58% better than other 2008 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.3% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.27% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.27% fail on Electrical wiring
-
7.2% fail on
Position lamps
-
8.6% fail on
Brakes
(46% better than other 2008 vans)
-
4.6% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
4.6% fail on
Components
- 4.0% fail on Pipes
- 0.54% fail on Reservoirs (5 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Hoses
- 0.27% fail on Valves
- 0.27% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.27% fail on Leaks
-
4.6% fail on
Components
-
3.2% fail on
Brake performance
(63% better than other 2008 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Front wheels
- 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.80% fail on Brake performance not tested (7 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.54% fail on Rear wheels (87% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Brake operation
-
1.9% fail on
Hub components
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads
- 0.54% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.80% fail on ABS
-
4.6% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
7.0% fail on
Suspension
(60% better than other 2008 vans)
-
1.9% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.1% fail on Front
- 0.80% fail on Rear
-
1.9% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.9% fail on Condition
-
1.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(78% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.80% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.27% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.27% fail on Attachment
-
1.1% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 1.1% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
1.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
0.80% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.54% fail on Spring mounting
- 0.27% fail on Component mounting
-
0.54% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.54% fail on Condition
-
0.27% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.27% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.27% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.9% fail on
Wheel bearings
-
6.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.8% fail on Washers
- 2.9% fail on Wipers
- 0.54% fail on Mirrors
- 0.27% fail on Bonnet
- 0.27% fail on Windscreen
-
2.7% fail on
Tyres
(62% better than other 2008 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Tread depth
- 0.54% fail on Condition (83% better than other 2008 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Steering
-
1.9% fail on
Steering system
- 0.80% fail on Drag link end (16 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.54% fail on Ball joint
-
0.27% fail on
Free play
- 0.27% fail on Steering box
-
0.27% fail on
Other components
- 0.27% fail on Steering pivot point
- 0.27% fail on Locking devices
-
1.9% fail on
Steering system
-
1.6% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 1.3% fail on Body condition
-
0.27% fail on
Load security
- 0.27% fail on Tailgate
-
1.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.54% fail on Condition
- 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.80% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.80% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.80% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(77% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.54% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.27% fail on Emissions
-
0.80% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.80% fail on Registration plate