Mercedes-Benz Vito MOT Results
Registered in 200858.2% pass rate
from 5,454 tests in 2021
(10% better than other 2008 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 vans and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz Vito is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(15% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
7.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 7.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.037% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.018% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
4.3% fail on
Service brake performance
(42% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
(43% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 3.5% fail on Service brake performance (44% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (59% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
0.037% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.037% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.018% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.018% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
(43% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
3.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt
- 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.29% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.055% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.037% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.037% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.037% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.037% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt
-
0.64% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(58% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.62% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(59% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.50% fail on Service brake imbalance (39% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Service brake performance (84% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.018% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.018% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.62% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(59% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
7.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (22% better than other 2008 vans)
-
2.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(40% better than other 2008 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(36% better than other 2008 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads (37% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.055% fail on Brake linings
-
1.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(32% better than other 2008 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Brake discs (35% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.073% fail on Brake drums
-
0.11% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(80% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.055% fail on Lever
- 0.018% fail on Cable
- 0.018% fail on Linkage
- 0.018% fail on Relay lever
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(36% better than other 2008 vans)
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake control
(2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.3% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.57% fail on Anti-lock braking system (59% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Electronic braking system (7 times worse than other 2008 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(89% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.72% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Pedal
- 0.35% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.055% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.037% fail on Other components
-
0.018% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.018% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
0.037% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.037% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.037% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(86% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.037% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (82% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.018% fail on Load sensing valves
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(15% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
17% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(16% better than other 2008 vans)
-
5.1% fail on
Headlamps
(41% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 4.9% fail on Headlamp (43% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.29% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 4.4% fail on Stop lamp (29% better than other 2008 vans)
-
3.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.40% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
3.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
3.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (52% better than other 2008 vans)
-
2.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.42% fail on Side repeaters (55% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.18% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.42% fail on
Electrical equipment
(66% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Horn (68% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.073% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.055% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.037% fail on Battery(ies) (86% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.17% fail on
Position lamps
(64% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Position lamp (70% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.018% fail on All position lamps
- 0.018% fail on Switch
-
0.055% fail on
Hazard warning
(85% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.055% fail on Switch (85% better than other 2008 vans)
-
5.1% fail on
Headlamps
(41% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
14% fail on
Suspension
(26% better than other 2008 vans)
-
6.0% fail on
Springs
(36% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
5.9% fail on
Coil springs
(150% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 5.9% fail on Coil spring (160% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.055% fail on Mounting
- 0.073% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (78% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.018% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.018% fail on Spring saddle
-
5.9% fail on
Coil springs
(150% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
5.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(22% better than other 2008 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (40% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints (50% better than other 2008 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.64% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.39% fail on Ball joint (45% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Linkage (55% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (77% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.037% fail on Anti-roll bar
-
3.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(50% better than other 2008 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Ball joint (27% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Ball joint dust cover (61% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Pins and bushes (90% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.037% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.037% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.46% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (84% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.37% fail on Wheel bearings (79% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.28% fail on
Other suspension component
(63% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint (51% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.037% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.018% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.22% fail on Shock absorbers (72% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.055% fail on
Macpherson strut
(83% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.037% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.018% fail on Ball joint
-
0.055% fail on
Sub-frames
(82% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.037% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.018% fail on Sub-frame
-
6.0% fail on
Springs
(36% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
7.8% fail on
Visibility
(17% better than other 2008 vans)
- 4.9% fail on Washers
- 2.1% fail on Wipers (52% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.42% fail on Bonnet (91% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
0.42% fail on
View to rear
(46% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Mirrors (47% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.018% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
0.40% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.40% fail on Windscreen
-
6.4% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(37% better than other 2008 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Exhaust system (48% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Transmission
(73% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.57% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.37% fail on Joints
- 0.18% fail on Prop shaft
- 0.018% fail on Flexible couplings
- 0.018% fail on Bearing housing
-
0.51% fail on
Drive shafts
(84% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Joints (84% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.57% fail on
Prop shafts
-
0.77% fail on
Doors
-
0.50% fail on
Other passenger's door
(99% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.48% fail on Door condition (100% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.018% fail on Catch
-
0.17% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.17% fail on Door condition
-
0.11% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.092% fail on Door condition (65% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.018% fail on Catch
-
0.50% fail on
Other passenger's door
(99% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
0.33% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(79% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.33% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (78% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.33% fail on
Body
(45% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Other body component
- 0.13% fail on Panel
- 0.29% fail on Bumpers
-
0.28% fail on
Fuel system
(56% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.073% fail on Pipe
- 0.037% fail on Hose
- 0.018% fail on Tank
-
0.15% fail on
Seats
- 0.092% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.055% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.13% fail on
Chassis
(87% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.11% fail on Chassis condition (89% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.018% fail on Strengthening plate
-
0.037% fail on
Towbar
- 0.037% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.037% fail on
Load security
- 0.018% fail on Tailgate
- 0.018% fail on Loading door
-
0.037% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.037% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.037% fail on
Cabs
- 0.037% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.037% fail on Passenger compartment
-
0.018% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.018% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
6.4% fail on
Tyres
- 3.7% fail on Tread depth
- 2.9% fail on Condition
- 0.24% fail on Size/type
-
5.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(25% better than other 2008 vans)
-
4.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(26% better than other 2008 vans)
-
3.4% fail on
Compression ignition
(27% better than other 2008 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (29% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.73% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.62% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (39% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.44% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (49% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.092% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.037% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.037% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.018% fail on Particulate filter
- 0.037% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.018% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
-
1.2% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.99% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.073% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.055% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
0.018% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.018% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.018% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
3.4% fail on
Compression ignition
(27% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.62% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.55% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.055% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.018% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.018% fail on Other leaks
-
4.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(26% better than other 2008 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(33% better than other 2008 vans)
- 1.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Seat belts
(54% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.61% fail on Condition
- 0.31% fail on Prescribed areas (77% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.092% fail on Attachment
- 0.018% fail on Requirements
-
0.018% fail on
Airbags
- 0.018% fail on Drivers airbag
-
1.8% fail on
Steering
(70% better than other 2008 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(75% better than other 2008 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Track rod end (75% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.055% fail on Steering arm
- 0.037% fail on Ball joint (83% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.018% fail on Drag link end
-
0.42% fail on
Steering gear
(50% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.42% fail on Steering rack (48% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.15% fail on
Steering play
- 0.15% fail on Steering rack
-
0.092% fail on
Power steering
(84% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.073% fail on Operation
- 0.018% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.037% fail on Steering column
- 0.037% fail on Electronic power steering
- 0.018% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.018% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.018% fail on Universal joint
-
1.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(75% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.73% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.73% fail on Registration plates
-
0.33% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.29% fail on Attachment
- 0.037% fail on Condition
-
0.037% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.037% fail on Anchorages