MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Mitsubishi » L200 » 1997
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 1997
54.2% pass rate
from 260 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 11% fail on Fog lamp (130% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Tell tale
    • 9.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.3% fail on Front lamps (99% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.2% fail on Rear reflectors (9 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.38% fail on Switch
    • 3.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.7% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.38% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.38% fail on Switch
    • 1.5% fail on Battery
    • 1.2% fail on Horn
    • 0.77% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.38% fail on Lamp
      • 0.38% fail on Switch
      • 0.38% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.77% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.38% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.38% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 6.9% fail on Prescribed areas (44% better than other 1997 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Spring mounting
      • 2.3% fail on Component mounting (74% better than other 1997 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Front drive shafts (110% worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 5.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (110% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.38% fail on Universal joint
    • 4.2% fail on Leaf springs (4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Shackle (6 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 0.77% fail on Anchor (14 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.38% fail on Spring saddle
    • 4.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.77% fail on Attachment
    • 3.8% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 3.1% fail on Front
      • 1.2% fail on Rear
    • 3.5% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.38% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 8.5% fail on Components
        • 5.8% fail on Pipes
        • 1.9% fail on Valves
        • 1.2% fail on Hoses
        • 0.38% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.5% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (7 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Leaks
    • 8.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.8% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 1.2% fail on Hub components
      • 0.77% fail on Brake drums (6 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.77% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (10 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.38% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.38% fail on Pedal
        • 0.38% fail on Condition
  • 12% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 7.7% fail on Body condition
    • 4.6% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 4.6% fail on Chassis
    • 0.38% fail on Body security
    • 0.38% fail on Seats
      • 0.38% fail on Drivers
    • 0.38% fail on Load security
      • 0.38% fail on Bootlid
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.7% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.9% fail on Tank (6 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Cap
      • 0.38% fail on System
    • 1.2% fail on Emissions
    • 0.77% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 8.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.77% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.9% fail on Steering
    • 6.9% fail on Steering system
      • 3.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 2.3% fail on Other components (16 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Steering pivot point (20 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.77% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.38% fail on Intermediate drop arm
    • 0.38% fail on Steering control
      • 0.38% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.38% fail on Steering column
  • 4.6% fail on Tyres
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.77% fail on Size/type
  • 3.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
      • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas (71% better than other 1997 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.38% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.38% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.38% fail on Attachment