MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Mitsubishi » L200 » 1997

Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 1997
46.1% pass rate
from 217 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 13% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (190% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 13% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 13% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 10% fail on Position lamps (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 10% fail on Position lamp (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.92% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.46% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.2% fail on Rear reflectors (11 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.92% fail on Trailer electrical socket (8 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.46% fail on Horn
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.46% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.46% fail on Switch
  • 28% fail on Body, chassis, structure (70% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 10% fail on Transmission (160% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 3.2% fail on Prop shaft (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Joints (6 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 0.92% fail on Flexible couplings (7 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Drive shafts
        • 5.5% fail on Joints
    • 8.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 5.5% fail on Chassis
      • 5.1% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.46% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 4.6% fail on Body (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Panel (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Body condition (18 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.46% fail on Other body component
    • 2.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.8% fail on System (6 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.92% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.92% fail on Seats
      • 0.92% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.46% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.46% fail on Carrier
    • 0.46% fail on Floor
    • 0.46% fail on Cabs
      • 0.46% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 8.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 6.9% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Leaf springs (11 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 4.1% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (17 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 0.92% fail on Leaf spring (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 0.92% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (14 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 0.92% fail on Shackle bracket (34 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.8% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 2.8% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.46% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.46% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 9.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.46% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.46% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.46% fail on Rbt
          • 0.46% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 6.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.46% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.46% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.8% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.4% fail on Pedal
      • 0.46% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.46% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.46% fail on Servos
    • 0.46% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.46% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.46% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.46% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 9.7% fail on Visibility
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers
    • 3.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.92% fail on View to rear
      • 0.92% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.46% fail on Driver's view
  • 7.4% fail on Steering
    • 6.5% fail on Steering linkage components (140% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Intermediate drop arm (19 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 0.92% fail on Power steering
      • 0.46% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.46% fail on Other components
  • 6.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 0.92% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.46% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 2.3% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.8% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.46% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 2.8% fail on Identification of the vehicle (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
  • 2.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.8% fail on Tyres
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.92% fail on Condition
    • 0.46% fail on Size/type
  • 0.46% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.46% fail on Condition