MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Mitsubishi » L200 » 1997

Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 1997
56.2% pass rate
from 146 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 8.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 6.2% fail on Transmission
      • 4.1% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Joints (11 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Prop shaft
      • 2.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.1% fail on Joints
    • 4.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 4.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 4.8% fail on Chassis
      • 4.8% fail on Chassis condition
    • 3.4% fail on Body (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Body condition (17 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Mounting fixings (28 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Panel
      • 0.68% fail on Other body component
    • 2.1% fail on Cabs
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.68% fail on Pipe
      • 0.68% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.4% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.68% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.68% fail on Carrier
    • 0.68% fail on Doors
      • 0.68% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.68% fail on Door condition
    • 0.68% fail on Floor
  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (140% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 8.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 8.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Rear reflectors (16 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.1% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.68% fail on Horn
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.68% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.68% fail on Headlamp
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 6.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.5% fail on Springs (150% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Leaf springs (9 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Leaf spring (8 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 0.68% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 0.68% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (150% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 4.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.8% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.68% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 8.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt
          • 5.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.68% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.68% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.68% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.68% fail on Rbt
          • 0.68% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 4.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 2.1% fail on Pedal
    • 2.1% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Other braking system component (9 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 0.68% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 1.4% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.68% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.68% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.68% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.68% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.68% fail on Brake pads
  • 8.2% fail on Visibility
    • 6.8% fail on Wipers
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on View to rear
      • 1.4% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.5% fail on Steering
    • 6.8% fail on Steering linkage components (180% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.4% fail on Intermediate drop arm (47 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.68% fail on Other components
        • 0.68% fail on Steering component
    • 0.68% fail on Steering column
  • 4.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 1.4% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.4% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 2.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.68% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth