Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results
Registered in 199754.2% pass rate
from 260 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
11% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(120% worse than other 1997 vans)
- 11% fail on Fog lamp (130% worse than other 1997 vans)
- 0.77% fail on Tell tale
-
9.2% fail on
Position lamps
- 7.3% fail on Front lamps (99% worse than other 1997 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Rear lamps
- 6.9% fail on Stop lamp
- 4.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 4.2% fail on Rear reflectors (9 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp
- 0.38% fail on Switch
-
3.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.7% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.38% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.38% fail on Switch
-
3.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.5% fail on Battery
- 1.2% fail on Horn
-
0.77% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.38% fail on Lamp
- 0.38% fail on Switch
- 0.38% fail on Tell tale
- 0.77% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.38% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.38% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
11% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(120% worse than other 1997 vans)
-
21% fail on
Suspension
-
6.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
(44% better than other 1997 vans)
- 5.4% fail on Spring mounting
- 2.3% fail on Component mounting (74% better than other 1997 vans)
-
6.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(120% worse than other 1997 vans)
-
5.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
(110% worse than other 1997 vans)
- 5.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (110% worse than other 1997 vans)
-
0.38% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.38% fail on Universal joint
-
5.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
(110% worse than other 1997 vans)
-
4.2% fail on
Leaf springs
(4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Pins and bushes
(8 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Shackle (6 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 0.77% fail on Anchor (14 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Spring eye
- 0.38% fail on Spring saddle
-
2.3% fail on
Pins and bushes
(8 times worse than other 1997 vans)
-
4.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.77% fail on Attachment
-
3.8% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 3.1% fail on Front
- 1.2% fail on Rear
-
3.5% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 3.5% fail on Condition
- 2.3% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.38% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.38% fail on Condition
-
6.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
(44% better than other 1997 vans)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
10% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
8.5% fail on
Components
- 5.8% fail on Pipes
- 1.9% fail on Valves
- 1.2% fail on Hoses
- 0.38% fail on Reservoirs
- 1.5% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (7 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Leaks
-
8.5% fail on
Components
-
8.8% fail on
Brake performance
- 3.8% fail on Front wheels
- 3.8% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.9% fail on Brake imbalance
-
1.2% fail on
Hub components
- 0.77% fail on Brake drums (6 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Brake discs
-
1.2% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.77% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (10 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
0.38% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.38% fail on
Pedal
- 0.38% fail on Condition
-
0.38% fail on
Pedal
-
10% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
12% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 7.7% fail on Body condition
-
4.6% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 4.6% fail on Chassis
- 0.38% fail on Body security
-
0.38% fail on
Seats
- 0.38% fail on Drivers
-
0.38% fail on
Load security
- 0.38% fail on Bootlid
-
11% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 7.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.7% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.9% fail on Tank (6 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Cap
- 0.38% fail on System
- 1.2% fail on Emissions
- 0.77% fail on Emissions not tested
-
8.8% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.8% fail on Wipers
- 3.1% fail on Washers
- 0.77% fail on Windscreen
-
6.9% fail on
Steering
-
6.9% fail on
Steering system
- 3.8% fail on Track rod end
-
2.3% fail on
Other components
(16 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Steering pivot point (20 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 0.77% fail on Ball joint
- 0.77% fail on Drag link end
- 0.38% fail on Intermediate drop arm
-
0.38% fail on
Steering control
- 0.38% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.38% fail on Steering column
-
6.9% fail on
Steering system
-
4.6% fail on
Tyres
- 1.9% fail on Condition
- 1.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.77% fail on Size/type
-
3.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.5% fail on Condition
- 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas (71% better than other 1997 vans)
-
0.38% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.38% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate
-
0.38% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.38% fail on Attachment