MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Mitsubishi » L200 » 1999

Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 1999
54.0% pass rate
from 248 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (140% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 9.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 8.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.40% fail on Switch
    • 3.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.40% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.40% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.81% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.40% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.40% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.40% fail on Horn
    • 1.6% fail on Rear reflectors (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.81% fail on Headlamps (82% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Headlamp (80% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.40% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.40% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.40% fail on Switch
    • 0.40% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 6.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.6% fail on Springs (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Leaf springs (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Leaf spring (9 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (15 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.40% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 1.2% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.4% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.40% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.5% fail on Transmission
      • 4.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.0% fail on Joints
      • 3.2% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Prop shaft (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Joints (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.40% fail on Bearing housing
    • 5.2% fail on Chassis
      • 5.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.4% fail on Body
      • 1.2% fail on Panel
      • 0.81% fail on Other body component
      • 0.40% fail on Body condition
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.2% fail on Cabs
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.40% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.40% fail on Pipe
    • 0.40% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.40% fail on Towbar
      • 0.40% fail on Other towbar components
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 8.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.2% fail on Rbt
          • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.81% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.40% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.40% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 4.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.40% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.40% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt
          • 0.40% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 5.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.2% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.81% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.81% fail on Pedal
    • 0.81% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.81% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.81% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.81% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.40% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.40% fail on Lever
    • 0.40% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.40% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 10% fail on Steering (76% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 9.7% fail on Steering linkage components (190% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Drag link end (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Locking devices (12 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.40% fail on Other components
        • 0.40% fail on Steering component
    • 0.40% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.40% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.40% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.40% fail on Steering play
      • 0.40% fail on Steering box
  • 6.9% fail on Visibility
    • 4.0% fail on Washers
    • 2.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.81% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.81% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.81% fail on View to rear
      • 0.81% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 1.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.81% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.81% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
  • 2.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.40% fail on Requirements
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
  • 0.81% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.40% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.40% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.40% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.40% fail on Attachment