Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 1999
55.0% pass rate
from 409 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 11% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (180% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (180% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Switch
    • 7.6% fail on Position lamps (160% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Position lamp (150% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Switch
    • 6.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.24% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.4% fail on Rear reflectors (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment (63% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Horn
      • 0.49% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.24% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.49% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.24% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.24% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 8.1% fail on Leaf springs (9 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (16 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 3.2% fail on Leaf spring (9 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.73% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts (11 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.24% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.24% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 2.0% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 8.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.4% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.24% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.2% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.98% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.24% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.98% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.98% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.73% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.73% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.24% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
  • 22% fail on Body, chassis, structure (41% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Exhaust system (64% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Transmission (67% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Prop shaft (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Bearing housing (11 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.98% fail on Joints
        • 0.73% fail on Flexible couplings (12 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.4% fail on Joints
        • 0.49% fail on Drive shaft (7 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Chassis
      • 5.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 4.2% fail on Body (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Panel (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Other body component (190% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.98% fail on Mounting fixings (25 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Body condition (7 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.2% fail on Cabs (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.73% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.73% fail on Pipe
      • 0.24% fail on Hose
    • 0.49% fail on Towbar
      • 0.24% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.24% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.24% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.24% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.24% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.24% fail on Seats
      • 0.24% fail on Driver's seat
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.24% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 4.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.49% fail on Decelerometer (10 times worse than other 1999 vans)
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake performance (10 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.49% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.73% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.73% fail on Rbt
          • 0.73% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 7.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (73% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.49% fail on Brake linings (16 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.98% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.73% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.24% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.24% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.24% fail on Cable
    • 1.5% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.73% fail on Reservoirs (12 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.49% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.49% fail on Pedal
    • 0.49% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.49% fail on Lever
    • 0.49% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.49% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.24% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.24% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.24% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.24% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 5.6% fail on Wipers
    • 4.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.49% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.24% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.24% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.24% fail on View to rear
      • 0.24% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.3% fail on Steering
    • 5.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Drag link end (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Other components
        • 0.24% fail on Steering linkage
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering
      • 0.49% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.49% fail on Rams (10 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Pump
    • 0.49% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 7.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.9% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (120% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.24% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.24% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 2.0% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 2.0% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.24% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.49% fail on Condition
    • 0.24% fail on Size/type
  • 1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.49% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Condition
    • 0.24% fail on Attachment
  • 0.24% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.24% fail on Anchorages