Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 1999
50.3% pass rate
from 580 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 12% fail on Position lamps (77% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 10% fail on Front lamps (120% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Rear lamps
    • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 11% fail on Fog lamp (170% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Tell tale (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Switch
    • 9.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Rear reflectors (11 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.3% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.0% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.34% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.17% fail on Switch
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.17% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.6% fail on Battery
    • 1.2% fail on Horn
    • 1.0% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.34% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.34% fail on Lamp
  • 28% fail on Suspension (25% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 13% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 7.8% fail on Component mounting
      • 5.9% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.52% fail on Subframe mounting (73% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 7.1% fail on Leaf springs (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 4.3% fail on Shackle (9 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Securing bolts (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.17% fail on Anchor bracket
    • 6.2% fail on Drive shafts (66% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Front drive shafts (65% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 6.0% fail on Constant velocity joints (67% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.17% fail on Drive shafts
    • 6.0% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.34% fail on Attachment
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.9% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 2.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment
    • 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.7% fail on Front
      • 0.34% fail on Rear
    • 0.17% fail on General condition
    • 0.17% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 10% fail on Components
        • 7.8% fail on Pipes (63% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Valves
        • 1.2% fail on Hoses
        • 0.17% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.4% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
    • 9.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance (71% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.34% fail on Brake operation
    • 2.1% fail on Hub components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.69% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.34% fail on Brake drums (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.86% fail on Pedal
        • 0.52% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.34% fail on Condition
    • 0.69% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.52% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.34% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.17% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
  • 14% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (68% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 9.5% fail on Body condition (120% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Vehicle structure (83% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Chassis (83% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Body security
    • 0.17% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.17% fail on Seats
      • 0.17% fail on Drivers
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.9% fail on Wipers
    • 5.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.52% fail on Mirrors
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (38% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 8.4% fail on Exhaust system (45% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Emissions
    • 1.9% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.86% fail on System
      • 0.52% fail on Pipe
      • 0.34% fail on Tank
      • 0.34% fail on Cap
      • 0.17% fail on Hose
    • 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested (150% worse than other 1999 vans)
  • 10% fail on Steering (56% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 9.3% fail on Steering system (68% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Track rod end (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Drag link end (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Other components (7 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Steering pivot point (7 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Free play
        • 0.17% fail on Steering box
      • 0.17% fail on Steering box
      • 0.17% fail on Steering arm
    • 1.0% fail on Power steering
      • 0.69% fail on Operation
      • 0.17% fail on Drive system
      • 0.17% fail on Pump
    • 0.34% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.17% fail on Locking devices
  • 5.5% fail on Tyres
    • 4.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition (62% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Size/type
  • 3.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.86% fail on Condition
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.17% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.52% fail on Towbars
    • 0.34% fail on Towbar
    • 0.17% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.52% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.52% fail on Attachment