Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 2004
52.8% pass rate
from 6,148 tests in 2017
(8.0% better than other 2004 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Position lamps (24% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 7.8% fail on Front lamps (27% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Rear lamps (27% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.081% fail on All position lamps
    • 8.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (25% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.7% fail on Direction indicators (65% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 6.7% fail on Flashing type (65% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 5.1% fail on Individual lamps (89% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.99% fail on All direction indicators (100% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Fog lamp (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.098% fail on Switch
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim (23% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Rear reflectors (7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Battery
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (69% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (72% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.081% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.049% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.033% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
        • 0.016% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.68% fail on Horn (67% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Hazard warning (59% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Lamp
      • 0.15% fail on Switch (75% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.23% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.016% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 22% fail on Suspension (9.5% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 8.7% fail on Leaf springs (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Condition (10 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 3.7% fail on Shackle (11 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.50% fail on Anchor (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Other pins and bushes
      • 0.52% fail on Shackle bracket (7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Securing bolts (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Anchor bracket (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Spring eye (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (18% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (57% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Attachment
      • 0.049% fail on Linkage condition (91% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Condition
    • 6.3% fail on Drive shafts (43% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Front drive shafts (42% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 6.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (42% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.081% fail on Couplings
        • 0.016% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.20% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.13% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.065% fail on Universal joint (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Shock absorbers (92% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Condition (91% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.033% fail on Fitment (7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings (27% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Front
      • 0.033% fail on Rear (93% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Suspension arms (65% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (66% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Condition
      • 0.049% fail on Attachment
    • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas (79% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Component mounting (80% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Spring mounting (82% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Subframe mounting (88% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints (55% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.065% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.049% fail on Coil springs (98% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.049% fail on Condition (98% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.033% fail on Tie bars/rods (82% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.016% fail on Attachment
    • 0.016% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.016% fail on Attachment
  • 16% fail on Brakes (21% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 11% fail on Hydraulic systems (27% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 10% fail on Components (29% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 9.5% fail on Pipes (59% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.83% fail on Valves (44% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Hoses (45% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.65% fail on Leaks
      • 0.33% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.21% fail on Operation
    • 5.8% fail on Brake performance (49% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.6% fail on Rear wheels (71% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (39% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.98% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.72% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.16% fail on Brake operation (170% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Hub components (47% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (36% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Brake discs (80% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.033% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.016% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.39% fail on Parking brake (69% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Service brake control components (47% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Pedal (47% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Anti-slip (61% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.15% fail on ABS (88% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.065% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.065% fail on Components
        • 0.033% fail on Servos
        • 0.016% fail on Pipes
        • 0.016% fail on Valves
    • 0.033% fail on Mechanical components (93% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Lever
      • 0.016% fail on Cable
    • 0.016% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.016% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 9.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (47% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust system (50% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Fuel system (86% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Cap (72% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on System
      • 0.016% fail on Hose
    • 2.0% fail on Emissions
    • 0.80% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 9.0% fail on Driver's view of the road (24% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 3.5% fail on Washers (25% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Windscreen (63% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Mirrors (84% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.033% fail on Bonnet (86% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.016% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 8.4% fail on Steering (19% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Steering system (33% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Track rod end (19% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Other components (9 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Steering pivot point (10 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Drag link end (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Free play
        • 0.33% fail on Steering box (9 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.34% fail on Steering box (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.033% fail on Intermediate drop arm
    • 0.42% fail on Power steering (51% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Other components
      • 0.065% fail on Operation (83% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.049% fail on Pipes and hoses (78% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.033% fail on Drive system
      • 0.016% fail on Pump
    • 0.24% fail on Locking devices (7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.065% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.049% fail on Steering operation (75% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.016% fail on Steering control
      • 0.016% fail on Steering column
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres (54% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth (46% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.98% fail on Condition (72% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.081% fail on Size/type (76% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.049% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (53% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Body condition (47% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.88% fail on Vehicle structure (50% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Chassis (50% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Body security
    • 0.11% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.065% fail on Load security
      • 0.033% fail on Tailgate
      • 0.016% fail on Access panel
      • 0.016% fail on Bootlid
    • 0.033% fail on Engine mountings (83% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.033% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.033% fail on Seats (91% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Passengers
      • 0.016% fail on Drivers
    • 0.016% fail on Doors
      • 0.016% fail on Passengers front
  • 1.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (71% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts (70% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Condition
      • 0.36% fail on Prescribed areas (87% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Requirements
      • 0.016% fail on Installation check
        • 0.016% fail on Anchorage's
    • 0.41% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (76% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (74% better than other 2004 vans)
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.016% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.42% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.42% fail on Attachment
  • 0.15% fail on Towbars
    • 0.13% fail on Towbar
    • 0.016% fail on Swivelling towbar