MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Mitsubishi » L200 » 2004

Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 2004
54.3% pass rate
from 4,174 tests in 2021
(7.8% better than other 2004 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (8.4% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Direction indicators (84% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Flashing type (84% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 5.2% fail on Individual direction indicators (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.57% fail on All direction indicators (150% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 6.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 6.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.024% fail on Switch
    • 5.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (70% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (20% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Rear reflectors (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps (58% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp (61% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.024% fail on Matched pair
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.91% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.34% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Horn (74% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.1% fail on Position lamps (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Position lamp (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.096% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.096% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.096% fail on Hazard warning (87% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.096% fail on Switch (87% better than other 2004 vans)
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (20% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 8.1% fail on Transmission (75% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Drive shafts (50% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 5.8% fail on Joints (50% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.048% fail on Drive shaft
      • 2.9% fail on Prop shafts (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Prop shaft (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.86% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Flexible couplings (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Bearing housing (180% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust system (68% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.048% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.048% fail on Sub-frame condition
      • 0.048% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 2.5% fail on Chassis
      • 2.5% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.024% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system (75% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Tank (89% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.24% fail on Pipe
      • 0.072% fail on Hose
      • 0.024% fail on System
    • 1.1% fail on Body
      • 0.46% fail on Panel
      • 0.43% fail on Other body component
      • 0.17% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.072% fail on Body condition
    • 0.57% fail on Cabs
      • 0.57% fail on Prescribed areas (85% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.14% fail on Towbar
      • 0.096% fail on Other towbar components (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Towbar condition
      • 0.024% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.096% fail on Floor
    • 0.072% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.072% fail on Carrier
    • 0.072% fail on Engine mounting (73% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.072% fail on Doors (91% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Other passenger's door (86% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.024% fail on Door condition
        • 0.024% fail on Catch
      • 0.024% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.024% fail on Door condition
    • 0.048% fail on Seats (86% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.024% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.024% fail on Load security
      • 0.024% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.024% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.024% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.024% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.024% fail on Undertray
  • 17% fail on Suspension (21% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.5% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (160% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.096% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 6.2% fail on Springs (64% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Leaf springs (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on Leaf spring (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.41% fail on Shackle bracket (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.072% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.048% fail on Spring saddle
      • 0.41% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.024% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.024% fail on Coil spring
    • 3.3% fail on Suspension arms (51% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint (46% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Ball joint dust cover (57% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Suspension arm (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes (87% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (57% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers (50% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.19% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint (66% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.048% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.048% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.29% fail on Sub-frames (68% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (63% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.024% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.024% fail on Ball joint
  • 14% fail on Brakes (22% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (51% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Brake performance (46% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance (25% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.048% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.048% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.048% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.024% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.024% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (33% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (37% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (36% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (39% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.024% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.024% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (83% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.93% fail on Rbt (sp) (85% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.89% fail on Brake performance not tested (73% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance (92% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Rbt (93% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance (93% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.024% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.024% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.024% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 0.98% fail on Mechanical brake components (68% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Brake linings and pads (48% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.79% fail on Brake pads (49% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.024% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.17% fail on Brake discs and drums (86% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Brake discs (85% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (92% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.024% fail on Cable
        • 0.024% fail on Lever
    • 0.89% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.46% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.36% fail on Pedal
      • 0.12% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.46% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.19% fail on Valves (200% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.46% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (95% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Prescribed areas (100% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Other braking system component
        • 0.17% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.024% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.024% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
      • 0.024% fail on Other components
    • 0.26% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.26% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (84% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Anti-lock braking system (84% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Parking brake control (67% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Lever (67% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.024% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.14% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.048% fail on Servos
      • 0.024% fail on Operation
      • 0.024% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.024% fail on Leaks
      • 0.024% fail on Valves
  • 8.9% fail on Visibility (13% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 4.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.12% fail on View to rear (81% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Mirrors (81% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.072% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.048% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.048% fail on Condition of glass (90% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Windscreen (89% better than other 2004 vans)
  • 8.6% fail on Steering (23% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Steering linkage components (55% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Intermediate drop arm (11 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Drag link end (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Steering linkage (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Steering component (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Locking devices (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.55% fail on Steering play (89% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Steering box (7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.096% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.38% fail on Steering gear (70% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Steering box (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Operation
      • 0.024% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.24% fail on Power steering (64% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.072% fail on Operation
      • 0.048% fail on Other components (79% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.048% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.024% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.024% fail on Steering column
    • 0.024% fail on Steering shaft
    • 0.024% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.024% fail on Universal joint
  • 6.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (43% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (39% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Compression ignition (46% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested (61% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (150% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Emission control equipment (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.12% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.096% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.024% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.14% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.072% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.93% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.72% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.14% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Fluid leaks (71% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Engine oil leaks (73% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.024% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.024% fail on Undertray
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres (43% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth (27% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Condition (61% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (64% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts (61% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Condition
      • 0.55% fail on Prescribed areas (74% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.096% fail on Requirements
    • 0.57% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (66% better than other 2004 vans)
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.024% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.38% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.38% fail on Attachment
  • 0.024% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.024% fail on Doors
      • 0.024% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
  • 0.024% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.024% fail on Anchorages