MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Mitsubishi » L200 » 2012

Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 2012
65.2% pass rate
from 3,473 tests in 2021
(18% better than other 2012 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 10.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (4 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 10.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 10.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Stop lamp (54% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (31% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (27% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (69% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (63% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps (39% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp (41% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.63% fail on Rear reflectors (140% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.29% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.086% fail on Horn (81% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Direction indicators (88% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Flashing type (88% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on Individual direction indicators (85% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.029% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.35% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.35% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.29% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.29% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.058% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.029% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.029% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 11% fail on Brakes (17% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (84% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Brake performance (54% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.55% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.029% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.029% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.37% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (54% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Rbt (sp) (60% better than other 2012 vans)
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.058% fail on Service brake performance (89% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.058% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.29% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (93% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Rbt (sp) (94% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.17% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Rbt (88% better than other 2012 vans)
          • 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2012 vans)
          • 0.029% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (40% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads (28% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Brake pads (27% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Brake discs and drums (65% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.49% fail on Brake discs (65% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.17% fail on Cable
    • 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.29% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.35% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.26% fail on Pedal
      • 0.086% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.29% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.29% fail on Lever
    • 0.12% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.058% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.058% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.058% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.058% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 6.4% fail on Suspension (53% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Springs (22% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Leaf springs (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Leaf spring (3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.058% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.029% fail on Spring saddle
        • 0.029% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.086% fail on Coil springs (97% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.086% fail on Coil spring (97% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Suspension arms (66% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint (39% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.029% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers (93% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.75% fail on Anti-roll bars (85% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Linkage ball joints (76% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint (72% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.086% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (89% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Pins and bushes (93% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Wheel bearings (68% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Other suspension component (66% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.029% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.029% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.029% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.029% fail on Other components
  • 5.5% fail on Visibility (27% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers (42% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.23% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.14% fail on View to rear (77% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Mirrors (76% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.029% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (25% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Transmission
      • 2.0% fail on Drive shafts (47% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Joints (46% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.84% fail on Prop shaft (7 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Flexible couplings (5 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.058% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.63% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.29% fail on Body
      • 0.29% fail on Other body component
    • 0.20% fail on Seats
      • 0.14% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.058% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.14% fail on Fuel system (65% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.086% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.029% fail on Tank
      • 0.029% fail on Pipe
    • 0.086% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.058% fail on Cabs
      • 0.058% fail on Steps (13 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.029% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.029% fail on Carrier
    • 0.029% fail on Towbar
      • 0.029% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.029% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.029% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.029% fail on Load security
      • 0.029% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.029% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.029% fail on Doors
      • 0.029% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.029% fail on Door condition
    • 0.029% fail on Passenger compartment
    • 0.029% fail on Undertray
  • 3.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (33% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (31% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Compression ignition (26% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (45% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.058% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.029% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.029% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.029% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.63% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.60% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.029% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.14% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.029% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres (49% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth (47% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (56% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.69% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.55% fail on Condition
      • 0.086% fail on Requirements
      • 0.058% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.0% fail on Steering (74% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Steering linkage components (87% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Track rod end (88% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.32% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.29% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.029% fail on Operation
    • 0.26% fail on Power steering
      • 0.17% fail on Other components
      • 0.086% fail on Operation
      • 0.029% fail on Rams
  • 0.95% fail on Identification of the vehicle (62% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.95% fail on Registration plates (63% worse than other 2012 vans)
  • 0.40% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.40% fail on Attachment (120% worse than other 2012 vans)