Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results

Registered in 2016
83.7% pass rate
from 7,133 tests in 2020
(29% better than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.9% fail on Brakes (15% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (2.1% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (9.5% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on Brake pads (9.9% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.028% fail on Brake linings (21% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Brake discs and drums (6.2% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Brake discs (7.5% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.014% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.014% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.014% fail on Linkage
    • 1.1% fail on Brake performance (46% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Service brake performance (21% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.86% fail on Rbt (23% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.50% fail on Service brake performance (5.1% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance (95% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake performance not tested (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.084% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (56% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.070% fail on Rbt (sp) (62% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.056% fail on Service brake imbalance (39% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.014% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.028% fail on Parking brake performance (92% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.028% fail on Rbt (92% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.028% fail on Parking brake performance (91% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (98% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.014% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.014% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 0.35% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (6.3% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal (28% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Hand lever (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Rigid brake pipes (90% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Parking brake control (26% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Lever (26% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (54% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Electronic stability control (38% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.084% fail on Anti-lock braking system (68% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.028% fail on Hydraulic systems (27% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Brake fluid (15% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.014% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.014% fail on Leaks
    • 0.014% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.014% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.014% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 4.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (43% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (23% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (19% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (77% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (77% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (75% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.028% fail on Switch (50% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Headlamps (69% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (16 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Headlamp (94% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Headlamp levelling device (7.3% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Stop lamp (74% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (68% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Direction indicators (76% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Flashing type (76% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Side repeaters (72% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.056% fail on Individual direction indicators (85% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Electrical equipment (6.1% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Trailer electrical socket (93% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Battery(ies) (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Horn (79% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Position lamps (20% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Position lamp (24% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps (15% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps (13% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.042% fail on Rear reflectors (78% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 4.6% fail on Visibility (8.1% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers (22% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Washers (22% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Condition of glass (66% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Windscreen (66% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.042% fail on Driver's view (33% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.014% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.014% fail on View to rear
      • 0.014% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.1% fail on Tyres (52% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth (50% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (52% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 1.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Seat belts (73% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Condition (74% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Requirements
    • 0.084% fail on Airbags (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.084% fail on Drivers airbag (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.97% fail on Suspension (70% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Anti-roll bars (43% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes (21% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joints (57% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (36% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Linkage (84% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.25% fail on Shock absorbers (61% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Springs (75% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Leaf springs (76% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Leaf spring (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.014% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.014% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.014% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 0.45% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (72% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on Exhaust emissions (70% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Compression ignition (66% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (79% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (33% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.070% fail on Emissions not tested (7.8% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.014% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.014% fail on Particulate filter
      • 0.056% fail on Spark ignition (85% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.056% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (85% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.43% fail on Body, chassis, structure (71% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Body (60% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Other body component (56% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Panel
    • 0.084% fail on Transmission (86% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Drive shafts (90% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.056% fail on Joints (89% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Prop shafts (36% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.028% fail on Joints (10% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.042% fail on Spare wheel (31% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Spare wheel condition (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Carrier
    • 0.042% fail on Doors (64% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Other passenger's door (29% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.028% fail on Door condition (18% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.014% fail on Door condition
    • 0.028% fail on Chassis (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Chassis condition (12 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.028% fail on Bumpers (72% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.028% fail on Seats (58% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Passenger's seat (26% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.014% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.014% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.014% fail on Hose
    • 0.014% fail on Load security
      • 0.014% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.014% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.014% fail on Cabs
      • 0.014% fail on Steps
  • 0.20% fail on Identification of the vehicle (32% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Registration plates (32% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.084% fail on Road Wheels (34% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.084% fail on Attachment (1.5% worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.056% fail on Steering (90% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.028% fail on Steering gear (26% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Steering rack (3.7% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.014% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.014% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.014% fail on Power steering
      • 0.014% fail on Other components