Mitsubishi L200 MOT Results
Registered in 201683.8% pass rate
from 7,120 tests in 2021
(37% better than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi L200 is unusually good or bad.
-
5.6% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(41% better than other 2016 vans)
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
(21% better than other 2016 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.014% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(120% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(120% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.014% fail on Switch
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(120% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.52% fail on Stop lamp (75% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.48% fail on
Headlamps
(75% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.29% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (12 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Headlamp (90% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.48% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (74% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.32% fail on
Direction indicators
(77% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.32% fail on
Flashing type
(77% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Side repeaters (75% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.084% fail on Individual direction indicators (82% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.32% fail on
Flashing type
(77% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.31% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.31% fail on Position lamp
- 0.20% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.17% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.17% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.15% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.084% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.042% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.028% fail on Horn
- 0.014% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.028% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.028% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
(21% better than other 2016 vans)
-
4.4% fail on
Brakes
(32% better than other 2016 vans)
-
2.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.7% fail on Brake pads
-
0.51% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(39% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Brake discs (39% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.014% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.014% fail on Lever
-
2.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.90% fail on
Brake performance
(66% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.67% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.67% fail on
Rbt
- 0.49% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.67% fail on
Rbt
-
0.11% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(58% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.084% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(67% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.056% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.028% fail on Service brake performance (82% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.028% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.084% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(67% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.098% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.056% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(97% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.042% fail on Rbt (sp) (97% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.014% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.028% fail on
Parking brake performance
(94% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.028% fail on
Rbt
(94% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.028% fail on Parking brake performance (93% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.028% fail on
Rbt
(94% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.67% fail on
Service brake performance
- 0.53% fail on Rigid brake pipes (62% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.21% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.14% fail on Pedal
- 0.070% fail on Hand lever
-
0.18% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.18% fail on Lever
-
0.17% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(70% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.098% fail on Electronic stability control (68% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.084% fail on Anti-lock braking system (80% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.042% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.028% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.014% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.014% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.014% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.014% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.014% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.014% fail on Other components
-
2.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
4.0% fail on
Visibility
(25% better than other 2016 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Wipers
- 1.3% fail on Washers (40% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.18% fail on
Condition of glass
(56% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Windscreen (55% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.084% fail on
View to rear
(78% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.070% fail on Mirrors (82% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.014% fail on Indirect vision devices
- 0.042% fail on Bonnet
-
2.0% fail on
Tyres
(58% better than other 2016 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Tread depth (49% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.74% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.042% fail on Size/type
-
1.7% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(92% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 1.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.15% fail on
Seat belts
(74% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Condition (71% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.014% fail on
Airbags
- 0.014% fail on Drivers airbag
-
1.00% fail on
Suspension
(78% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.46% fail on
Springs
(70% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.46% fail on
Leaf springs
(150% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.45% fail on Leaf spring (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.014% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
-
0.46% fail on
Leaf springs
(150% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.31% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(73% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.070% fail on Linkage
- 0.028% fail on Ball joint
- 0.014% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.014% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.014% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.15% fail on Shock absorbers (65% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.042% fail on Wheel bearings (83% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.042% fail on
Suspension arms
(97% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.014% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.014% fail on Ball joint
- 0.014% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.014% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.014% fail on Ball joint
-
0.46% fail on
Springs
(70% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.59% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(73% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.59% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(71% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.46% fail on
Compression ignition
(71% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (78% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.20% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.042% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.13% fail on
Spark ignition
(74% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.098% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (78% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.014% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.014% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.46% fail on
Compression ignition
(71% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.59% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(71% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.58% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(72% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.28% fail on
Transmission
(72% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.21% fail on
Prop shafts
(2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.056% fail on Prop shaft (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.070% fail on
Drive shafts
(92% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.070% fail on Joints (92% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.21% fail on
Prop shafts
(2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.084% fail on
Body
(74% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.042% fail on Panel
- 0.042% fail on Other body component (84% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.056% fail on
Doors
-
0.042% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.028% fail on Door condition
- 0.014% fail on Catch
-
0.014% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.014% fail on Door condition
-
0.042% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.042% fail on Exhaust system (84% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.042% fail on Bumpers
-
0.042% fail on
Seats
- 0.042% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.028% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.014% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.014% fail on System
-
0.028% fail on
Load security
-
0.028% fail on
Tailgate
(5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.028% fail on Tailgate condition (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.028% fail on
Tailgate
(5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.014% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.014% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.014% fail on Undertray
-
0.28% fail on
Transmission
(72% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.37% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.37% fail on Registration plates
-
0.11% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.11% fail on Attachment
-
0.056% fail on
Steering
(95% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.028% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.028% fail on Steering rack
-
0.014% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.014% fail on Track rod end
-
0.014% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.014% fail on Universal joint
-
0.028% fail on
Steering gear