Nissan Cabstar MOT Results
Registered in 199761.5% pass rate
from 96 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Cabstar is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Brakes
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
- 8.3% fail on Rear wheels
- 7.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 6.3% fail on Parking brake performance
- 3.1% fail on Front wheels
- 2.1% fail on Brake imbalance
-
9.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
9.4% fail on
Components
- 8.3% fail on Pipes
- 2.1% fail on Hoses
- 1.0% fail on Valves
-
9.4% fail on
Components
-
3.1% fail on
Hub components
- 1.0% fail on Brake pads
- 1.0% fail on Brake drums
- 1.0% fail on Brake calipers
-
2.1% fail on
Mechanical components
- 2.1% fail on Cable
- 1.0% fail on Additional braking devices
-
1.0% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.0% fail on Condition
-
1.0% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 1.0% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
-
1.0% fail on
Components
- 1.0% fail on Servos
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
-
19% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 8.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
7.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 7.3% fail on Headlamp
-
1.0% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 1.0% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
5.2% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 1.0% fail on All position lamps
- 1.0% fail on Front lamps
- 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
3.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.1% fail on Individual lamps
- 1.0% fail on Tell tales
-
3.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.1% fail on Fog lamp
- 1.0% fail on Tell tale
- 1.0% fail on Battery
- 1.0% fail on Rear reflectors
- 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
16% fail on
Suspension
- 6.3% fail on Front suspension joints (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
-
6.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 6.3% fail on Component mounting
-
4.2% fail on
Leaf springs
(4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 3.1% fail on Condition (9 times worse than other 1997 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Pins and bushes
- 1.0% fail on Shackle
- 1.0% fail on Shackle bracket
-
2.1% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.1% fail on Condition
-
1.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.0% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.0% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.0% fail on Front
-
15% fail on
Steering
(140% worse than other 1997 vans)
-
10% fail on
Steering system
- 4.2% fail on Drag link end (16 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 4.2% fail on Track rod end
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint
- 1.0% fail on Steering arm
-
1.0% fail on
Other components
- 1.0% fail on Steering pivot point
-
2.1% fail on
Power steering
- 1.0% fail on Operation
- 1.0% fail on Other components
- 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas (12 times worse than other 1997 vans)
-
10% fail on
Steering system
-
13% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
13% fail on
Seat belts
- 13% fail on Prescribed areas (130% worse than other 1997 vans)
-
13% fail on
Seat belts
-
10% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 6.3% fail on Body condition
-
3.1% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 3.1% fail on Chassis
- 1.0% fail on Body security
-
1.0% fail on
Seats
- 1.0% fail on Passengers
-
10% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.3% fail on Washers
- 5.2% fail on Wipers
- 2.1% fail on Mirrors
-
8.3% fail on
Tyres
- 4.2% fail on Tread depth
- 3.1% fail on Condition
- 1.0% fail on Size/type
-
7.3% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.1% fail on
Fuel system
- 3.1% fail on Cap (7 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Emissions
-
3.1% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.1% fail on Registration plate
- 1.0% fail on Vehicle Identification Number