MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Nissan » Cabstar » 2010
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Nissan Cabstar MOT Results

Registered in 2010
46.4% pass rate
from 504 tests in 2017
(36% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Cabstar is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Brakes (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 25% fail on Brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 21% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 8.1% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Service brake performance (19 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Front wheels (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Parking brake (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Hub components (59% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 3.6% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.2% fail on Components
        • 0.60% fail on Pipes (73% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.40% fail on Hoses
        • 0.20% fail on Valves
      • 0.99% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Leaks
    • 2.2% fail on ABS (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.20% fail on Additional braking devices
    • 0.20% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal
        • 0.20% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.20% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (24% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 11% fail on Direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 11% fail on Flashing type (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 8.7% fail on Side repeaters (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.2% fail on All direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 8.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.9% fail on Headlamp aim (75% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.8% fail on Rear lamps (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Front lamps (57% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.6% fail on Horn (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.8% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.20% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.60% fail on Electrical wiring (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.20% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 28% fail on Suspension (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 16% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 8.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Attachment (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.99% fail on Linkage condition
    • 14% fail on Shock absorbers (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 14% fail on Condition (11 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Front suspension joints (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Suspension arms (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
      • 0.20% fail on Securing bolts
    • 0.20% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.20% fail on Front
  • 15% fail on Driver's view of the road (80% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Washers (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Windscreen
  • 9.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Exhaust system (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Emissions not tested (12 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Fuel system (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.99% fail on Cap (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Tank (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 8.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.5% fail on Seat belts (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.5% fail on Prescribed areas (78 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.99% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.99% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 8.1% fail on Tyres
    • 4.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.60% fail on Size/type
  • 4.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Seats (11 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Drivers (17 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Passengers (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.99% fail on Body condition
    • 0.60% fail on Vehicle structure (23 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Chassis (23 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Body security (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Spare wheel (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Load security
      • 0.20% fail on Hinged tailboard
  • 2.2% fail on Steering
    • 0.99% fail on Power steering
      • 0.79% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Drive system
    • 0.79% fail on Steering system (75% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.20% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.20% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.40% fail on Steering control
      • 0.20% fail on Steering shaft
      • 0.20% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.20% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.40% fail on Steering operation
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.79% fail on Road Wheels (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Attachment
    • 0.20% fail on Condition