Nissan Cabstar MOT Results
Registered in 201046.4% pass rate
from 504 tests in 2017
(36% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Cabstar is unusually good or bad.
-
31% fail on
Brakes
(160% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
25% fail on
Brake performance
(3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 21% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 8.1% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 6.9% fail on Service brake performance (19 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 4.2% fail on Front wheels (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
6.9% fail on
Parking brake
(7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 6.9% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
6.9% fail on
Hub components
(59% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 4.4% fail on Brake pads
- 3.6% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Brake calipers
-
2.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
1.2% fail on
Components
- 0.60% fail on Pipes (73% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Hoses
- 0.20% fail on Valves
- 0.99% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Leaks
-
1.2% fail on
Components
- 2.2% fail on ABS (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.20% fail on Additional braking devices
-
0.20% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.20% fail on
Pedal
- 0.20% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.20% fail on
Pedal
-
0.20% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.20% fail on Operation
-
25% fail on
Brake performance
(3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
30% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(24% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
11% fail on
Direction indicators
(3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
11% fail on
Flashing type
(3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 8.7% fail on Side repeaters (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Individual lamps
- 1.2% fail on All direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
11% fail on
Flashing type
(3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 8.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 7.9% fail on Headlamp aim (75% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
7.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.8% fail on Rear lamps (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 2.4% fail on Front lamps (57% better than other 2010 vans)
- 5.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.0% fail on Headlamp
- 3.6% fail on Horn (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.8% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.20% fail on Tell tale
- 0.60% fail on Electrical wiring (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.20% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
11% fail on
Direction indicators
(3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
28% fail on
Suspension
(110% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
16% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 8.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 6.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Attachment (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.99% fail on Linkage condition
-
14% fail on
Shock absorbers
(10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 14% fail on Condition (11 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 5.0% fail on Front suspension joints (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
4.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(110% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 4.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.40% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.20% fail on Condition
- 0.20% fail on Securing bolts
-
0.20% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.20% fail on Front
-
16% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
15% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(80% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 7.7% fail on Washers (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 4.4% fail on Wipers
- 2.4% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Windscreen
-
9.5% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 7.7% fail on Exhaust system (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Emissions not tested (12 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Fuel system
(170% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.99% fail on Cap (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.79% fail on Tank (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
8.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
7.5% fail on
Seat belts
(9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 7.5% fail on Prescribed areas (78 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.99% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.99% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
7.5% fail on
Seat belts
(9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
8.1% fail on
Tyres
- 4.8% fail on Tread depth
- 3.2% fail on Condition
- 0.60% fail on Size/type
-
4.4% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
2.2% fail on
Seats
(11 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Drivers (17 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Passengers (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.99% fail on Body condition
-
0.60% fail on
Vehicle structure
(23 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.60% fail on Chassis (23 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Body security (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Spare wheel (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.20% fail on
Load security
- 0.20% fail on Hinged tailboard
-
2.2% fail on
Seats
(11 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
2.2% fail on
Steering
-
0.99% fail on
Power steering
- 0.79% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Drive system
-
0.79% fail on
Steering system
(75% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Steering rack
- 0.20% fail on Intermediate drop arm
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint
- 0.20% fail on Track rod end
-
0.40% fail on
Steering control
- 0.20% fail on Steering shaft
-
0.20% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.20% fail on Universal joint
- 0.40% fail on Steering operation
-
0.99% fail on
Power steering
-
1.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate
-
0.79% fail on
Road Wheels
(2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.60% fail on Attachment
- 0.20% fail on Condition