MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Nissan » Cabstar » 2010
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Nissan Cabstar MOT Results

Registered in 2010
45.5% pass rate
from 572 tests in 2020
(31% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Cabstar is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Brakes (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 27% fail on Brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 24% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 24% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 7.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 6.6% fail on Service brake performance (13 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 7.3% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 7.0% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.35% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 4.9% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.9% fail on Rbt (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 4.0% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 7.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (60% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Brake discs and drums (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 5.8% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.52% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.17% fail on Cable
        • 0.17% fail on Lever
        • 0.17% fail on Relay lever
    • 4.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Parking brake control (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.0% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.35% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.17% fail on Pedal
      • 0.17% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.35% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.35% fail on Load sensing valves (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 29% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (37% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 11% fail on Direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 11% fail on Flashing type (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 8.9% fail on Side repeaters (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 7.7% fail on Headlamps (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim (61% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Electrical equipment (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Battery(ies) (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Electrical wiring (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 4.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.2% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.17% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.70% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.35% fail on All outline marker lamps (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Outline marker lamp
  • 23% fail on Suspension (60% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 14% fail on Anti-roll bars (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 8.4% fail on Suspension arms (92% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 8.2% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.4% fail on Other suspension component (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.35% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.35% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.17% fail on Springs
      • 0.17% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.17% fail on Leaf spring
  • 15% fail on Visibility (93% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 8.4% fail on Washers (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers (66% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on View to rear (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition of glass (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Windscreen (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust system (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Body (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Mounting fixings (69 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Other body component
      • 0.52% fail on Body condition (26 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Panel
      • 0.17% fail on Pillar
    • 2.1% fail on Seats (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Driver's seat (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Passenger's seat (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Bumpers (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.87% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.52% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.35% fail on System
    • 0.52% fail on Load security (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Dropside (52 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Dropside condition (46 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Other dropside component (133 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Floor (36 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Towbar (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Safety device
      • 0.17% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.35% fail on Cabs (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Steps
      • 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.17% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.17% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.17% fail on Transmission
      • 0.17% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.17% fail on Joints
  • 6.8% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.35% fail on Size/type
  • 6.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Seat belts (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Prescribed areas (15 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.87% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 5.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.17% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.87% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.70% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.17% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.70% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.70% fail on Transmission oil leaks (12 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 2.4% fail on Steering (49% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components (60% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end (67% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.52% fail on Power steering
      • 0.52% fail on Operation
    • 0.35% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
      • 0.17% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.52% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.52% fail on Attachment