Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Nissan Cabstar MOT Results

Registered in 2012
53.0% pass rate
from 555 tests in 2017
(37% worse than other 2012 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Cabstar is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Suspension (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 18% fail on Anti-roll bars (6 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 11% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 8.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (11 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Attachment (14 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Linkage condition
    • 14% fail on Shock absorbers (14 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 14% fail on Condition (14 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Front suspension joints (5 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.8% fail on Front (160% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
      • 0.18% fail on Securing bolts
    • 0.18% fail on General condition
    • 0.18% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.6% fail on Rear lamps (120% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Front lamps (48% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Direction indicators (160% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Flashing type (160% worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 5.4% fail on Side repeaters (7 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.90% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.36% fail on All direction indicators
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.18% fail on Matched pair
    • 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Battery (4 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Electrical wiring (5 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Trailer electrical socket (4 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 22% fail on Brakes (160% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 14% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Service brake performance (15 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.9% fail on Hub components (59% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Brake discs (3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.54% fail on Brake calipers (4 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Brake linings
    • 1.8% fail on ABS (4 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Parking brake (150% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.1% fail on Components
        • 0.54% fail on Pipes
        • 0.36% fail on Valves (132 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Hoses
      • 0.54% fail on Leaks (6 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.4% fail on Pedal
        • 1.4% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.36% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.18% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.18% fail on Lever
    • 0.18% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road (67% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Washers (140% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.3% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.2% fail on Tyres (74% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Tread depth (95% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (200% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Body security (55 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Body condition
    • 0.18% fail on Load security
      • 0.18% fail on Dropside
  • 2.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (130% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust system (3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.18% fail on Tank
    • 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.90% fail on Steering
    • 0.54% fail on Steering system
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.18% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.36% fail on Power steering
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
      • 0.18% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 0.90% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.54% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.36% fail on Prescribed areas (50 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.36% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.18% fail on Towbars
    • 0.18% fail on Towbar
  • 0.18% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment
  • 0.18% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.18% fail on Registration plate