Nissan Kubistar MOT Results

Registered in 2003
43.4% pass rate
from 113 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Kubistar is unusually good or bad.

  • 33% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 18% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 11% fail on Position lamps
      • 9.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.88% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.3% fail on Hazard warning (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 4.4% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.7% fail on Battery
    • 2.7% fail on Horn
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.88% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.88% fail on Switch
    • 0.88% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.88% fail on Fog lamp
  • 27% fail on Suspension
    • 9.7% fail on Drive shafts
      • 9.7% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 9.7% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 7.1% fail on Front suspension joints (190% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.88% fail on Condition
      • 0.88% fail on Linkage condition
    • 4.4% fail on Coil springs
      • 4.4% fail on Condition
    • 4.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 3.5% fail on Rear (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Front
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.8% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.88% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.88% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 18% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 12% fail on Wipers
    • 7.1% fail on Washers
    • 2.7% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.88% fail on Mirrors
  • 15% fail on Tyres
    • 11% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.4% fail on Condition
  • 14% fail on Steering (91% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 13% fail on Steering system (110% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 9.7% fail on Steering rack (7 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.88% fail on Steering arm
    • 1.8% fail on Power steering
      • 1.8% fail on Operation
    • 0.88% fail on Steering operation
  • 9.7% fail on Brakes (55% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 7.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Front wheels
    • 2.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (74% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Components (72% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Reservoirs (10 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.88% fail on Pipes
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on ABS
  • 8.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 8.0% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 7.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.88% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.88% fail on Condition
  • 6.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 3.5% fail on Emissions
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust system
  • 1.8% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.88% fail on Towbars
    • 0.88% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.88% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.88% fail on Attachment