Nissan Kubistar MOT Results

Registered in 2004
42.2% pass rate
from 562 tests in 2017
(12% worse than other 2004 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Kubistar is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Suspension (29% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 10% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 10% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 8.0% fail on Drive shafts (80% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 8.0% fail on Front drive shafts (84% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 8.0% fail on Constant velocity joints (86% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 6.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
    • 6.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage condition (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (80% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
    • 3.7% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.3% fail on Rear (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Front
    • 3.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 16% fail on Registration plate lamp (39% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 8.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 8.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.71% fail on Rear lamps (75% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp (62% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Battery
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators (52% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type (52% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Individual lamps
    • 1.6% fail on Horn
    • 0.89% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.53% fail on Lamp
      • 0.36% fail on Switch
    • 0.71% fail on Rear fog lamp (78% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Fog lamp (77% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance (50% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.36% fail on Service brake performance (80% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.4% fail on Components
        • 4.1% fail on Pipes
        • 2.0% fail on Valves
        • 0.71% fail on Hoses
        • 0.36% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.18% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.53% fail on Leaks
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.53% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.6% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on ABS
    • 0.18% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.18% fail on Pedal
        • 0.18% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.18% fail on Restricted movement
  • 14% fail on Steering (95% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 13% fail on Steering system (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 7.7% fail on Track rod end (86% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 6.8% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.36% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.18% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.53% fail on Power steering
      • 0.36% fail on Other components
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
      • 0.18% fail on Pump
      • 0.18% fail on Rams
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.0% fail on Wipers
    • 5.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.89% fail on Mirrors
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 8.2% fail on Tread depth (59% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Size/type
    • 0.18% fail on Valve stem
  • 8.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (53% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.1% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 6.8% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts (62% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Condition
      • 0.36% fail on Prescribed areas (88% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Requirements
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
  • 7.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.1% fail on Emissions (160% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.36% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.18% fail on Cap
      • 0.18% fail on System
    • 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 2.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (61% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.89% fail on Body condition (74% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.53% fail on Doors
      • 0.36% fail on Drivers
      • 0.18% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.36% fail on Seats
      • 0.36% fail on Drivers
    • 0.18% fail on Spare wheel
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.89% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.18% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.71% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.71% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)