Nissan Kubistar MOT Results
Registered in 200542.1% pass rate
from 579 tests in 2017
(16% worse than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Kubistar is unusually good or bad.
-
33% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 13% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
9.8% fail on
Position lamps
- 8.5% fail on Front lamps
- 1.2% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.17% fail on All position lamps
- 0.17% fail on Switch
- 6.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.5% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.35% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.35% fail on Tell tales (18 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Side repeaters
-
4.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp
- 0.35% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.17% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.17% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 2.6% fail on Battery (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Hazard warning
(2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.52% fail on Lamp
- 0.17% fail on Tell tale
- 1.4% fail on Horn
- 0.35% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.17% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
29% fail on
Suspension
(26% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
9.5% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 9.5% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
7.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.3% fail on Linkage condition (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 2.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.86% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.52% fail on Attachment
-
7.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(56% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 6.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (56% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Attachment
-
5.9% fail on
Drive shafts
-
5.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 5.7% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.17% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.17% fail on Drive shafts
-
5.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 5.4% fail on Front suspension joints (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.6% fail on Condition
-
1.2% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.69% fail on Rear
- 0.52% fail on Front
-
0.69% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.69% fail on Condition
-
0.35% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.35% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.17% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.17% fail on Component mounting
-
9.5% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
20% fail on
Brakes
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
- 5.7% fail on Rear wheels
- 4.3% fail on Front wheels
- 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance (70% better than other 2005 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.35% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
4.5% fail on
Components
- 3.6% fail on Pipes
- 0.35% fail on Hoses
- 0.35% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.35% fail on Valves
- 0.17% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.17% fail on Leaks
-
4.5% fail on
Components
- 3.1% fail on ABS (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
2.9% fail on
Hub components
- 1.9% fail on Brake pads
- 1.6% fail on Brake discs
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.2% fail on Condition
- 0.86% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.35% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.35% fail on
Pedal
- 0.35% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.35% fail on
Pedal
-
0.35% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.35% fail on Cable
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Steering
(92% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
11% fail on
Steering system
(110% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 6.4% fail on Track rod end (66% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 4.8% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.69% fail on Ball joint
-
0.52% fail on
Free play
- 0.52% fail on Steering rack
- 0.17% fail on Steering arm
-
0.86% fail on
Power steering
- 0.69% fail on Operation
- 0.17% fail on Other components
-
11% fail on
Steering system
(110% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
12% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.9% fail on Wipers
- 5.0% fail on Washers
- 0.69% fail on Windscreen
- 0.35% fail on Mirrors
-
11% fail on
Tyres
- 6.2% fail on Tread depth
- 4.7% fail on Condition
- 0.52% fail on Size/type
- 0.17% fail on Valve stem
-
11% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(120% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
11% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 9.7% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.86% fail on Drivers airbag (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.35% fail on
Seat belts
(89% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Condition
- 0.17% fail on Attachment
-
11% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
6.6% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.8% fail on Emissions (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.35% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.17% fail on Hose
- 0.17% fail on System
- 0.35% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.7% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(67% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.52% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.52% fail on Body condition (81% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.52% fail on
Doors
- 0.35% fail on Drivers
- 0.17% fail on Passengers front
-
0.17% fail on
Seats
- 0.17% fail on Passengers
-
1.0% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.0% fail on Registration plate
-
0.17% fail on
Towbars
- 0.17% fail on Towbar
-
0.17% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.17% fail on Condition