Nissan Kubistar MOT Results

Registered in 2006
49.7% pass rate
from 314 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Kubistar is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 5.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.4% fail on Position lamp
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.32% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.32% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.2% fail on Horn
      • 0.64% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 2.5% fail on Hazard warning (4 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.64% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.64% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.64% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 8.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 5.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.32% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.32% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 7.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.64% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 5.1% fail on Springs
      • 5.1% fail on Coil springs (140% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 5.1% fail on Coil spring (140% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.2% fail on Other suspension component (180% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.96% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.96% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.64% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.32% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.32% fail on Sub-frame
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 9.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.0% fail on Service brake performance (90% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 7.0% fail on Rbt (93% worse than other 2006 vans)
          • 6.4% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2006 vans)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.32% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 2.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.32% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.96% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Pedal
    • 0.96% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.96% fail on Lever
    • 0.32% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.32% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.32% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.32% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.32% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 13% fail on Steering (110% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 6.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.64% fail on Ball joint
    • 6.1% fail on Steering gear (6 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Steering rack (7 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Steering play
      • 0.32% fail on Steering rack
  • 9.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.0% fail on Transmission
      • 7.0% fail on Drive shafts (87% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 7.0% fail on Joints (90% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.96% fail on Spare wheel (6 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.96% fail on Carrier (8 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.64% fail on Body
      • 0.64% fail on Other body component
    • 0.32% fail on Bumpers
  • 8.3% fail on Tyres
    • 5.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
  • 7.0% fail on Visibility
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.32% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.32% fail on View to rear
      • 0.32% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.96% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.96% fail on Condition
      • 0.32% fail on Attachment
  • 3.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.9% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.32% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.32% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
        • 0.32% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.32% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.64% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.64% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.32% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.32% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.32% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.32% fail on Condition