Nissan Navara MOT Results
Registered in 200455.8% pass rate
from 2,446 tests in 2017
(14% better than other 2004 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Navara is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(24% better than other 2004 vans)
- 8.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (24% better than other 2004 vans)
-
8.0% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.6% fail on Front lamps
- 1.9% fail on Rear lamps (32% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.16% fail on All position lamps
- 0.041% fail on Switch
- 4.5% fail on Stop lamp (39% better than other 2004 vans)
- 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 2004 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamps
(35% better than other 2004 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp (35% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.041% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.041% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.041% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
-
2.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(37% better than other 2004 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Fog lamp (36% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Tell tale
- 1.6% fail on Battery
- 0.74% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.74% fail on
Direction indicators
(82% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.74% fail on
Flashing type
(82% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.45% fail on Individual lamps (83% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.12% fail on Side repeaters (88% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.74% fail on
Flashing type
(82% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.33% fail on Horn (84% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.29% fail on
Hazard warning
(66% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Lamp
- 0.12% fail on Switch (79% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.16% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
21% fail on
Brakes
-
11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(29% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
11% fail on
Components
(33% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 9.6% fail on Pipes (61% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Valves
- 0.82% fail on Hoses
- 0.041% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.53% fail on Leaks
- 0.16% fail on Operation
- 0.082% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
11% fail on
Components
(33% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
- 7.5% fail on Rear wheels (36% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance (52% better than other 2004 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Front wheels (38% better than other 2004 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.57% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.37% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.33% fail on Brake operation (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.082% fail on Parking brake operation (17 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.082% fail on Gradient hand brake (42 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
1.9% fail on
Hub components
(41% better than other 2004 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads
- 0.25% fail on Brake discs (74% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.082% fail on Brake back plates
- 0.041% fail on Brake calipers
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.1% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on Restricted movement (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.82% fail on
Mechanical components
(82% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Cable
- 0.16% fail on Clevis joint (28 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Pivot (12 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Linkage (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.70% fail on ABS
-
0.53% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.53% fail on
Pedal
- 0.41% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.12% fail on Condition
-
0.53% fail on
Pedal
-
0.25% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.12% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
- 0.082% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.041% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
- 0.041% fail on Locking devices
-
11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(29% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
16% fail on
Suspension
(36% better than other 2004 vans)
-
4.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
(40% better than other 2004 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Spring mounting
- 2.0% fail on Component mounting (49% better than other 2004 vans)
-
4.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.25% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 3.8% fail on Front suspension joints (59% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
2.9% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 2.9% fail on Front (50% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.041% fail on Rear
-
1.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(60% better than other 2004 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
(60% better than other 2004 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (60% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.041% fail on Couplings
-
0.041% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.041% fail on Universal joint
-
1.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
(60% better than other 2004 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Leaf springs
(87% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Condition (190% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.45% fail on
Pins and bushes
- 0.45% fail on Shackle
- 0.041% fail on Anchor bracket
-
1.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(75% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.70% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (61% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.53% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (87% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.082% fail on Attachment (81% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.78% fail on
Shock absorbers
(61% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.78% fail on Condition (61% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.16% fail on General condition (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.082% fail on
Torsion bars
(7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.082% fail on Attachment (17 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.082% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
0.041% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.041% fail on Condition
-
0.041% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.041% fail on Condition
-
0.041% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.041% fail on Condition
-
4.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
(40% better than other 2004 vans)
-
9.6% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(19% better than other 2004 vans)
- 4.8% fail on Washers
- 4.7% fail on Wipers (26% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.49% fail on Windscreen (59% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.33% fail on Mirrors (71% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.041% fail on Bonnet
-
9.3% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(45% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 8.0% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.53% fail on Tank (160% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.41% fail on System
- 0.20% fail on Pipe
- 0.12% fail on Cap
- 0.82% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.33% fail on Emissions (79% better than other 2004 vans)
-
6.1% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 3.1% fail on Body condition
-
2.2% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 2.2% fail on Chassis
- 0.45% fail on Speedometer (9 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.29% fail on Spare wheel
- 0.25% fail on Body security
-
0.082% fail on
Seats
- 0.041% fail on Passengers
- 0.041% fail on Drivers
- 0.041% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.041% fail on
Doors
- 0.041% fail on Passengers other
-
0.041% fail on
Load security
- 0.041% fail on Access panel
-
5.1% fail on
Steering
(27% better than other 2004 vans)
-
3.2% fail on
Steering system
(45% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.90% fail on
Other components
(6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.90% fail on Steering pivot point (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.61% fail on Track rod end (85% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint
- 0.45% fail on Steering arm (140% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.29% fail on Drag link end
- 0.20% fail on Steering box (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Intermediate drop arm (35 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.12% fail on
Free play
- 0.12% fail on Steering box
- 0.12% fail on Lock stop (38 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.90% fail on
Other components
(6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Power steering
(74% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.74% fail on Operation (94% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.49% fail on Pipes and hoses (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Other components
- 0.12% fail on Pump
- 0.082% fail on Drive system
- 0.29% fail on Steering operation
- 0.25% fail on Locking devices (7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.20% fail on
Steering control
- 0.082% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.082% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.082% fail on Universal joint
- 0.041% fail on Steering column
-
3.2% fail on
Steering system
(45% better than other 2004 vans)
-
4.8% fail on
Tyres
(43% better than other 2004 vans)
- 3.9% fail on Tread depth (24% better than other 2004 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (70% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Size/type
-
2.0% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(63% better than other 2004 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts
(58% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.86% fail on Prescribed areas (70% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.53% fail on Condition
- 0.16% fail on Requirements
- 0.041% fail on Attachment
-
0.41% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(76% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.37% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (76% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.041% fail on Drivers airbag
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts
(58% better than other 2004 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate
-
0.98% fail on
Road Wheels
(150% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.94% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.041% fail on Condition
-
0.20% fail on
Towbars
- 0.12% fail on Vehicle structure
- 0.082% fail on Towbar