Nissan Navara MOT Results
Registered in 200554.1% pass rate
from 3,463 tests in 2017
(8.0% better than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Navara is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(20% better than other 2005 vans)
- 10.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
7.9% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.4% fail on Front lamps
- 1.8% fail on Rear lamps (33% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.029% fail on All position lamps
- 4.1% fail on Stop lamp (43% better than other 2005 vans)
- 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 2005 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamps
(35% better than other 2005 vans)
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp (35% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.058% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.029% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.029% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(45% better than other 2005 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Fog lamp (44% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Tell tale
- 1.2% fail on Battery
-
1.0% fail on
Direction indicators
(73% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Flashing type
(73% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.43% fail on Individual lamps (83% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Side repeaters (58% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.20% fail on All direction indicators (59% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.058% fail on Tell tales
-
1.0% fail on
Flashing type
(73% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.64% fail on Trailer electrical socket (190% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.58% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.52% fail on Switch
- 0.058% fail on Lamp
- 0.49% fail on Horn (72% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.20% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
18% fail on
Brakes
-
9.8% fail on
Brake performance
- 5.4% fail on Rear wheels
- 4.2% fail on Front wheels (46% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance (59% better than other 2005 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Service brake performance (47% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.69% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.43% fail on Brake performance not tested (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Brake operation (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.029% fail on Parking brake operation
-
7.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
6.7% fail on
Components
- 5.5% fail on Pipes
- 1.1% fail on Valves
- 0.35% fail on Hoses (60% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.087% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.029% fail on Cylinders
- 0.69% fail on Leaks (84% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Operation (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
6.7% fail on
Components
-
2.9% fail on
Hub components
- 2.3% fail on Brake pads
- 0.40% fail on Brake discs (58% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Brake drums (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.058% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.058% fail on Wheel cylinder
- 1.4% fail on ABS
-
1.0% fail on
Service brake control components
(57% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Pedal
(57% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.66% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.38% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Pedal
(57% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.55% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.52% fail on
Parking brake
(58% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.52% fail on Condition (57% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.35% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.14% fail on Cable
- 0.087% fail on Clevis joint (18 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.058% fail on Pivot (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.029% fail on Linkage
- 0.029% fail on Lever
-
0.087% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.087% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.058% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
- 0.029% fail on Additional braking devices
-
9.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
17% fail on
Suspension
(28% better than other 2005 vans)
-
5.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 4.2% fail on Spring mounting (63% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Component mounting
- 0.058% fail on Subframe mounting (90% better than other 2005 vans)
-
3.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(22% better than other 2005 vans)
- 3.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (26% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Condition
- 0.12% fail on Attachment
- 3.6% fail on Front suspension joints (49% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
3.2% fail on
Wheel bearings
(44% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 3.1% fail on Front (72% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Rear (75% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(50% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
(50% better than other 2005 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (51% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.029% fail on Couplings
- 0.029% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.087% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.087% fail on Universal joint
-
1.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
(50% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(77% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.98% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (76% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (86% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.029% fail on Attachment
-
0.98% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.75% fail on Condition (70% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.23% fail on
Pins and bushes
- 0.17% fail on Shackle
- 0.058% fail on Anchor
- 0.029% fail on Anchor bracket
-
0.78% fail on
Shock absorbers
(60% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.78% fail on Condition (60% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.12% fail on General condition (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.087% fail on
Coil springs
(97% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.087% fail on Condition (97% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.058% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.058% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.058% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
0.029% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.029% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
5.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
9.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(21% better than other 2005 vans)
- 4.4% fail on Wipers (30% better than other 2005 vans)
- 4.3% fail on Washers
- 0.58% fail on Windscreen (46% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Mirrors (65% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.029% fail on Bonnet
-
6.6% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 4.7% fail on Exhaust system (30% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.98% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.26% fail on System
- 0.12% fail on Cap
- 0.029% fail on Hose
- 0.029% fail on Pipe
- 0.52% fail on Emissions (58% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.43% fail on Emissions not tested
-
6.4% fail on
Steering
-
5.3% fail on
Steering system
- 4.6% fail on Track rod end
- 0.29% fail on Ball joint
-
0.20% fail on
Other components
- 0.20% fail on Steering pivot point (190% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Steering rack (86% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.087% fail on Steering box
- 0.058% fail on Lock stop (19 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.029% fail on
Free play
- 0.029% fail on Steering rack
- 0.029% fail on Intermediate drop arm
- 0.029% fail on Drag link end
- 0.029% fail on Steering arm
-
0.95% fail on
Power steering
- 0.52% fail on Operation
- 0.14% fail on Other components
- 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.12% fail on Pump
- 0.058% fail on Drive system
- 0.26% fail on Steering operation
- 0.12% fail on Locking devices (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.058% fail on
Steering control
- 0.029% fail on Steering column
- 0.029% fail on Steering shaft
-
5.3% fail on
Steering system
-
6.3% fail on
Tyres
(23% better than other 2005 vans)
- 5.3% fail on Tread depth
- 1.2% fail on Condition (64% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.087% fail on Valve stem
- 0.029% fail on Size/type
-
5.0% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
2.5% fail on
Vehicle structure
(100% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Chassis (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Body condition (44% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.64% fail on
Doors
- 0.32% fail on Drivers
- 0.29% fail on Passengers front
- 0.058% fail on Passengers other (82% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Speedometer (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Spare wheel
- 0.058% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.058% fail on Body security
-
0.058% fail on
Seats
(86% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.029% fail on Passengers
- 0.029% fail on Drivers
-
0.058% fail on
Load security
- 0.058% fail on Tailgate
-
2.5% fail on
Vehicle structure
(100% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
2.0% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(58% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts
(47% better than other 2005 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Condition
- 0.38% fail on Prescribed areas (83% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Requirements
- 0.058% fail on Attachment
-
0.029% fail on
Installation check
- 0.029% fail on Anchorage's
-
0.40% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(78% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.35% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (80% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.058% fail on Drivers airbag
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts
(47% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate
-
0.92% fail on
Road Wheels
(140% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.92% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.26% fail on
Towbars
- 0.17% fail on Towbar (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.087% fail on Vehicle structure