Nissan Navara MOT Results

Registered in 2010
58.5% pass rate
from 2,800 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Navara is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (13% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (23% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.9% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.11% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.9% fail on Direction indicators (45% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Flashing type (45% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.2% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.61% fail on Individual direction indicators (67% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.071% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Stop lamp (53% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps (35% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp (36% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.0% fail on Electrical equipment (87% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Horn (97% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.18% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.036% fail on Switch
    • 0.54% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.50% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.036% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.071% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.071% fail on Switch
    • 0.036% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.036% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.036% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 6.8% fail on Suspension arms (56% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Ball joint (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes (94% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Springs
      • 2.0% fail on Leaf springs (59% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Leaf spring (77% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
        • 0.14% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.11% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.036% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 1.0% fail on Coil springs (59% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Coil spring (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.071% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (55% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes (77% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.036% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.036% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.96% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.036% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.036% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.61% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.39% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.036% fail on Axles
      • 0.036% fail on Axle
    • 0.036% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.036% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.036% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.036% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.036% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.036% fail on Ball joint
  • 9.9% fail on Brakes (27% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (25% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.9% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.036% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.93% fail on Brake discs (38% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Brake drums (13 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.036% fail on Cable
    • 2.9% fail on Brake performance (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.64% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.036% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.036% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (77% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (69% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (90% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Rbt (sp) (93% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.36% fail on Parking brake performance (79% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt (78% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.29% fail on Parking brake performance (80% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.071% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.96% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.36% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.36% fail on Pedal
    • 0.36% fail on Load sensing valves (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.18% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.036% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.036% fail on Servos
    • 0.036% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.036% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.036% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.036% fail on Other components
  • 9.0% fail on Steering (88% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.9% fail on Steering linkage components (99% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.8% fail on Track rod end (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.036% fail on Other components
        • 0.036% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.43% fail on Steering column (13 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Steering coupling (11 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Flexible coupling (30 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Universal joint (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.21% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.18% fail on Power steering
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
    • 0.14% fail on Steering play
      • 0.14% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.036% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.036% fail on Steering shaft
  • 8.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (31% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Transmission (40% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.3% fail on Joints
        • 0.036% fail on Drive shaft
      • 1.9% fail on Prop shafts (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Joints (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.036% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Chassis (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Chassis condition (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Body
      • 0.11% fail on Mounting fixings (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Other body component
      • 0.036% fail on Body condition
    • 0.18% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.14% fail on Carrier
      • 0.036% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.14% fail on Fuel system (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.036% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.14% fail on Doors
      • 0.14% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
        • 0.036% fail on Catch
    • 0.11% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.11% fail on Load security
      • 0.11% fail on Tailgate (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.071% fail on Tailgate condition (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.071% fail on Other tailgate component (14 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.071% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.071% fail on Bracket
    • 0.071% fail on Seats
      • 0.071% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.036% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.036% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.036% fail on Towbar
      • 0.036% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.036% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.036% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.036% fail on Cabs
      • 0.036% fail on Steps
  • 8.1% fail on Visibility
    • 4.9% fail on Washers (36% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Wipers
    • 0.46% fail on View to rear
      • 0.46% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.18% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.18% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.11% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.036% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (36% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (33% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.071% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.036% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.036% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.96% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.11% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.29% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.071% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.0% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.036% fail on Size/type
  • 3.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (93% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Seat belts (53% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Condition
      • 0.071% fail on Requirements
    • 0.32% fail on Airbags (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Drivers airbag (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.64% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.64% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.46% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.46% fail on Attachment (150% worse than other 2010 vans)