Nissan NV200 MOT Results
Registered in 201669.2% pass rate
from 3,427 tests in 2021
(16% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan NV200 is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(54% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 3.7% fail on Stop lamp (79% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
3.7% fail on
Headlamps
(92% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 3.6% fail on Headlamp (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.029% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (98% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
(37% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.58% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
2.6% fail on
Direction indicators
(82% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
(82% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.38% fail on All direction indicators (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
(82% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.55% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.55% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.53% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.029% fail on Switch
-
0.55% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.55% fail on
Electrical equipment
(100% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.29% fail on Horn (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Battery(ies) (7 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.058% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.029% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.38% fail on
Reversing lamps
(110% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Reversing lamps (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.29% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.26% fail on Position lamp
- 0.029% fail on All position lamps
- 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
-
6.6% fail on
Suspension
(46% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
3.5% fail on
Suspension arms
(180% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 3.1% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.029% fail on Suspension arm
-
2.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(100% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.12% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.029% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.029% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.67% fail on
Springs
(56% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.55% fail on
Coil springs
(59% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.55% fail on Coil spring (59% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.12% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.058% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
- 0.029% fail on Leaf spring
- 0.029% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
-
0.55% fail on
Coil springs
(59% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.61% fail on Wheel bearings (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.18% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint
-
0.088% fail on
Suspension rods
(4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.088% fail on Ball joint (13 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.029% fail on Shock absorbers
-
3.5% fail on
Suspension arms
(180% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
6.3% fail on
Visibility
- 4.6% fail on Wipers (82% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Washers (39% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.41% fail on
View to rear
- 0.35% fail on Mirrors
- 0.058% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
0.18% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.18% fail on Windscreen
-
6.1% fail on
Tyres
(30% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 3.6% fail on Tread depth (48% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Condition
- 0.058% fail on Size/type
-
5.0% fail on
Brakes
(23% better than other 2016 vans)
-
2.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake performance
(49% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
(52% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.96% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.41% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
(52% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.53% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(98% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.53% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(100% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance (200% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.53% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(100% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.35% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(79% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Rbt (sp) (78% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.29% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.26% fail on
Rbt
- 0.26% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.029% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.029% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.26% fail on
Rbt
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake performance
(49% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(54% better than other 2016 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(57% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.99% fail on Brake pads (61% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Brake linings (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.41% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(51% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Brake discs (50% better than other 2016 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(57% better than other 2016 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(120% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.93% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.55% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.029% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.15% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.15% fail on Lever
-
0.12% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.058% fail on Pedal (80% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.058% fail on Hand lever
- 0.12% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.088% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.029% fail on Master cylinder
- 0.029% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.029% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.088% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.088% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (7 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.058% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
2.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.1% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.99% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.058% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (81% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.029% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.029% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.55% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.55% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.029% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.029% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
1.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.58% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (87% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.44% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.38% fail on Condition
- 0.029% fail on Attachment
- 0.029% fail on Requirements
-
0.029% fail on
Airbags
- 0.029% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.67% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(68% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.15% fail on
Spare wheel
(2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.088% fail on Spare wheel condition (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.088% fail on Carrier
-
0.15% fail on
Body
- 0.12% fail on Other body component
- 0.029% fail on Body condition
- 0.12% fail on Bumpers
-
0.12% fail on
Transmission
(88% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.12% fail on
Drive shafts
(87% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Joints (87% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.12% fail on
Drive shafts
(87% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.088% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.058% fail on
Doors
-
0.029% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.029% fail on Door condition
-
0.029% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.029% fail on Catch
-
0.029% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.15% fail on
Spare wheel
(2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.29% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.29% fail on Registration plates
-
0.29% fail on
Steering
(72% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.20% fail on
Steering linkage components
(73% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.058% fail on Track rod end (92% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.029% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.029% fail on Steering rack
- 0.029% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.029% fail on
Steering play
- 0.029% fail on Steering rack
-
0.20% fail on
Steering linkage components
(73% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.058% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.029% fail on Condition
- 0.029% fail on Attachment