Nissan NV200 MOT Results

Registered in 2016
69.6% pass rate
from 3,603 tests in 2020
(41% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan NV200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (70% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim (35% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim (30% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.028% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.0% fail on Position lamps (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Position lamp (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on All position lamps (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators (72% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type (72% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on All direction indicators (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.056% fail on Side repeaters (94% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.67% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.67% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.53% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.14% fail on Switch (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.19% fail on Horn
      • 0.083% fail on Battery(ies) (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.028% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.028% fail on Switch
    • 0.028% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.028% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 9.4% fail on Visibility (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 7.4% fail on Wipers (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.61% fail on View to rear
      • 0.61% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.028% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.31% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.31% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.056% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.5% fail on Tyres (64% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Condition (35% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.056% fail on Size/type
    • 0.028% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 3.9% fail on Brakes (23% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (48% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (48% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (49% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.028% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.25% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.22% fail on Brake discs (58% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.028% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.89% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.028% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.028% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.19% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.028% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.19% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (77% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt (sp) (76% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.11% fail on Rbt
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.056% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.78% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.028% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.28% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.25% fail on Lever
      • 0.028% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.056% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (86% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Pedal
      • 0.028% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.056% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.056% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (10 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.028% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.028% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.028% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 2.4% fail on Suspension
    • 0.97% fail on Anti-roll bars (85% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Linkage
      • 0.056% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.028% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.80% fail on Wheel bearings (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.083% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.028% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.056% fail on Springs (88% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.028% fail on Spring saddle
        • 0.028% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 0.028% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.028% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint
  • 1.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.72% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.61% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.083% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.028% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.33% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.33% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.056% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.028% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.028% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.028% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.028% fail on Undertray
  • 0.72% fail on Body, chassis, structure (46% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.14% fail on Body (67% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Other body component
      • 0.028% fail on Panel
    • 0.11% fail on Transmission (70% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.11% fail on Joints
    • 0.083% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.028% fail on Tank
      • 0.028% fail on Pipe
      • 0.028% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.083% fail on Doors
      • 0.083% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.056% fail on Door condition
        • 0.028% fail on Catch
    • 0.056% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.056% fail on Seats
      • 0.056% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.028% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.028% fail on Chassis
      • 0.028% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.028% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.028% fail on Carrier
    • 0.028% fail on Undertray
  • 0.56% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.36% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.19% fail on Seat belts (65% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Condition (67% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Attachment
      • 0.028% fail on Requirements
  • 0.17% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.17% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.056% fail on Steering (84% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.056% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.028% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.056% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.056% fail on Condition