Nissan NV200 MOT Results

Registered in 2016
69.2% pass rate
from 3,340 tests in 2020
(27% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan NV200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (69% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Dipswitch (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (12% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (1.7% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Direction indicators (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Flashing type (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.42% fail on All direction indicators (11 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.030% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp (22% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.96% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (57% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.96% fail on Rear fog lamp (57% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.81% fail on Rear fog lamp (35% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Position lamps (61% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Position lamp (67% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Electrical equipment (19% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Horn (83% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Electrical wiring (24% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.24% fail on Rear reflectors (27% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Reversing lamps (0.60% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Reversing lamps (3.1% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.030% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.030% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 6.9% fail on Visibility (38% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Washers (29% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on View to rear (0.49% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Mirrors (2.1% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Driver's view (91% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.090% fail on Condition of glass (76% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Windscreen (76% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 6.5% fail on Tyres (48% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth (64% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Condition (34% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.090% fail on Size/type (9.7% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 5.4% fail on Brakes (8.5% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Brake performance (10.0% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake imbalance (85% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.030% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.030% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.30% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (57% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt (sp) (64% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake imbalance (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.090% fail on Service brake performance (20% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Parking brake performance (26% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on Rbt (23% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.24% fail on Parking brake performance (20% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.030% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.27% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (79% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on Rbt (sp) (78% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Brake performance not tested (22% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (33% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (38% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads (39% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.090% fail on Brake linings (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Brake discs and drums (28% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.51% fail on Brake discs (31% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.030% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.060% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (33% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.060% fail on Cable (17% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.84% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Electronic stability control (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Anti-lock braking system (15% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.24% fail on Parking brake control (26% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Lever (26% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Rigid brake pipes (9.8% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.090% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (73% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Hand lever (54% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.060% fail on Hydraulic systems (56% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.030% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.060% fail on Flexible brake hoses (50% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.060% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (69% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (12 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.030% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.030% fail on Leaks
  • 4.4% fail on Suspension (36% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint (75% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (48% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.6% fail on Suspension arms (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Pins and bushes (6.1% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Ball joint dust cover (19% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Suspension arm (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (19 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Springs (81% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Coil springs (78% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Coil spring (78% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.060% fail on Shock absorbers (91% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.030% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.030% fail on Ball joint
  • 1.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (5.4% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (0.77% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Compression ignition (3.4% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.99% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (15% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (43% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.030% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.39% fail on Spark ignition (4.7% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (7.3% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.030% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.030% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.90% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (18% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Seat belts (25% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Condition (25% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Requirements
  • 0.78% fail on Body, chassis, structure (49% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Body (43% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Other body component (42% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Panel
    • 0.12% fail on Bumpers (18% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Transmission (79% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Drive shafts (78% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Joints (77% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.090% fail on Spare wheel (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Carrier (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.090% fail on Doors (24% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Other passenger's door (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.090% fail on Door condition (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.090% fail on Seats (36% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Passenger's seat (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.030% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.030% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.030% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.030% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.030% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels (17% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Condition (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.030% fail on Attachment
  • 0.12% fail on Identification of the vehicle (59% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Registration plates (58% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.060% fail on Steering (89% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.060% fail on Steering linkage components (83% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Track rod end (82% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.030% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.030% fail on Steering rack