Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Nissan Vanette MOT Results

Registered in 1998
41.2% pass rate
from 165 tests in 2017
(21% worse than other 1998 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Vanette is unusually good or bad.

  • 38% fail on Suspension (69% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 33% fail on Prescribed areas (190% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 25% fail on Component mounting (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 15% fail on Spring mounting (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 6.7% fail on Leaf springs (5 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Pins and bushes (14 times worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 4.8% fail on Shackle (13 times worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Anchor (14 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.61% fail on Securing bolts
    • 6.7% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 6.7% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.61% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.61% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.61% fail on Axles
      • 0.61% fail on Clearance
    • 0.61% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.61% fail on Front
  • 35% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.61% fail on All position lamps
    • 8.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 7.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.9% fail on Direction indicators (110% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 7.9% fail on Flashing type (110% worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 6.1% fail on Individual lamps (150% worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.61% fail on All direction indicators
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.8% fail on Battery
    • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.8% fail on Fog lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Horn
  • 33% fail on Brakes (59% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 22% fail on Brake performance (79% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 14% fail on Rear wheels (160% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 13% fail on Front wheels (180% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.61% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 15% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 15% fail on Components
        • 13% fail on Pipes (160% worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Hoses
        • 0.61% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.61% fail on Valves
      • 1.2% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Hub components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.2% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.61% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.61% fail on Cable
  • 13% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 5.5% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on System (3 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Tank
      • 1.2% fail on Pipe
    • 2.4% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.61% fail on Emissions
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.3% fail on Wipers
    • 4.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.61% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 5.5% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 5.5% fail on Chassis
    • 4.2% fail on Body condition
    • 0.61% fail on Seats
      • 0.61% fail on Drivers
  • 6.1% fail on Steering
    • 4.8% fail on Steering system
      • 3.6% fail on Steering rack
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.8% fail on Power steering
      • 1.2% fail on Operation
      • 0.61% fail on Other components
  • 4.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.61% fail on Condition
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate