Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Nissan Vanette MOT Results

Registered in 1999
37.6% pass rate
from 245 tests in 2017
(29% worse than other 1999 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Vanette is unusually good or bad.

  • 38% fail on Suspension (66% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 31% fail on Prescribed areas (190% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 24% fail on Component mounting (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 15% fail on Spring mounting (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 8.2% fail on Leaf springs (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 7.8% fail on Pins and bushes (15 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 6.9% fail on Shackle (15 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.82% fail on Anchor (10 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Spring eye
    • 6.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (180% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.82% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.41% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.41% fail on Location
    • 0.41% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
  • 31% fail on Brakes (52% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 18% fail on Hydraulic systems (93% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 16% fail on Components (87% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 11% fail on Pipes (120% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 6.1% fail on Hoses (150% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Valves
        • 0.82% fail on Reservoirs
      • 2.0% fail on Leaks (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (46% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 9.4% fail on Rear wheels (82% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 8.6% fail on Front wheels (89% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Hub components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.82% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.82% fail on Condition
    • 0.82% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.41% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.41% fail on Pedal
        • 0.41% fail on Condition
  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 7.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.41% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 6.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.9% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.82% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.82% fail on Side repeaters
    • 6.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.2% fail on Switch (32 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.41% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 2.4% fail on Battery
    • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.2% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.41% fail on Tell tale
  • 15% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (79% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 9.4% fail on Body condition (120% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Vehicle structure (120% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Chassis (120% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.82% fail on Seats
      • 0.82% fail on Passengers
      • 0.41% fail on Drivers
    • 0.41% fail on Doors
      • 0.41% fail on Drivers
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.1% fail on Wipers
    • 4.5% fail on Washers
    • 2.0% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.41% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.7% fail on Fuel system (150% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on System (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Hose
      • 0.41% fail on Cap
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions
    • 0.82% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 7.8% fail on Tyres
    • 4.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.41% fail on Size/type
  • 4.9% fail on Steering
    • 3.3% fail on Steering system
      • 1.6% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.82% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.41% fail on Free play
        • 0.41% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.82% fail on Power steering
      • 0.41% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.41% fail on Rams
    • 0.82% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.41% fail on Locking devices
  • 3.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate
  • 2.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
    • 0.41% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.41% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.41% fail on Towbars
    • 0.41% fail on Towbar