MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Nissan » Vanette » 2000

Nissan Vanette MOT Results

Registered in 2000
45.0% pass rate
from 129 tests in 2020
(21% worse than other 2000 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Vanette is unusually good or bad.

  • 35% fail on Suspension (90% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 28% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (62% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes (48% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.78% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 4.7% fail on Springs (94% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Leaf springs (94% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Suspension arms (0.36% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint (12% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (25% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 29% fail on Brakes (65% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 20% fail on Brake performance (79% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 12% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 7.8% fail on Service brake performance (99% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 4.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 7.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (50% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 7.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (51% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 7.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.78% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (29% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (28% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance (6.5% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (9.4% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance (23% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 11% fail on Rigid brake pipes (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (61% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.9% fail on Brake pads (200% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.78% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.6% fail on Hydraulic systems (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Servos
      • 0.78% fail on Reservoirs
    • 1.6% fail on Flexible brake hoses (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.78% fail on Pedal
    • 0.78% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.78% fail on Lever
  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (5.5% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 9.3% fail on Headlamps (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 9.3% fail on Headlamp (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Stop lamp (25% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim (20% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim (10% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.7% fail on Electrical equipment (24% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Battery(ies) (66% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Horn (43% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.78% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 3.1% fail on Direction indicators (6.8% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Flashing type (6.8% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators (34% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Side repeaters (82% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (15% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (62% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (62% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (61% better than other 2000 vans)
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2.0% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure (78% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (80% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust system (14% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Hose
      • 0.78% fail on System
    • 2.3% fail on Chassis (21% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Chassis condition (19% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Towbar
      • 0.78% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.78% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 8.5% fail on Visibility (9.0% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Wipers (41% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Washers (28% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.0% fail on Steering (9.7% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Steering gear (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Steering rack (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Power steering (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (2.9% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (17% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Compression ignition (71% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (6.5% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.78% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 1.6% fail on Fluid leaks (64% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.78% fail on Other leaks
  • 3.9% fail on Tyres (21% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth (11% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Size/type
  • 2.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (43% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts (36% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas (13% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.78% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.78% fail on Registration plates