Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Nissan Vanette MOT Results

Registered in 2000
39.7% pass rate
from 343 tests in 2017
(21% worse than other 2000 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Vanette is unusually good or bad.

  • 43% fail on Suspension (81% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 37% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 31% fail on Component mounting (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 17% fail on Spring mounting (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 9.6% fail on Leaf springs (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 8.7% fail on Pins and bushes (15 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 7.9% fail on Shackle (17 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.87% fail on Anchor (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Condition
      • 0.58% fail on Spring eye (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (95% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.58% fail on Condition (10 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Attachment
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage condition
    • 4.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.58% fail on Tie bars/rods (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
      • 0.29% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.29% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 34% fail on Brakes (58% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 21% fail on Brake performance (66% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 11% fail on Rear wheels (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 9.3% fail on Front wheels (91% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.3% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.7% fail on Brake performance not tested (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 19% fail on Hydraulic systems (84% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 18% fail on Components (87% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 16% fail on Pipes (200% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Hoses
        • 0.29% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.7% fail on Leaks (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Hub components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.29% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.7% fail on Restricted movement (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.87% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.58% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.29% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 7.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (16 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (17 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.6% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.58% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.58% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.2% fail on Battery
    • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.7% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.29% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.5% fail on Horn
    • 0.29% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.29% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.29% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.1% fail on Fuel system (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on System (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Cap
      • 0.29% fail on Pipe
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.58% fail on Emissions
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.4% fail on Wipers
    • 3.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.87% fail on Windscreen
  • 10% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 6.1% fail on Body condition
    • 4.7% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 4.7% fail on Chassis
  • 7.3% fail on Tyres
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Size/type
  • 7.0% fail on Steering
    • 4.7% fail on Steering system
      • 2.6% fail on Steering rack
      • 2.0% fail on Track rod end
    • 2.3% fail on Power steering (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Operation
      • 0.29% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.29% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (54% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
  • 2.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.87% fail on Towbars
    • 0.87% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.29% fail on Condition