MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Nissan » Vanette » 2001
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Nissan Vanette MOT Results

Registered in 2001
36.7% pass rate
from 294 tests in 2020
(28% worse than other 2001 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2001 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Vanette is unusually good or bad.

  • 43% fail on Suspension (110% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 35% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 10% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 7.8% fail on Leaf springs (6 times worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 7.5% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (22 times worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Leaf spring
      • 2.7% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.7% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (25 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 6.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (5 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.34% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.68% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.34% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.34% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.34% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.34% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.34% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 33% fail on Brakes (72% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 26% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 15% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 15% fail on Rbt (190% worse than other 2001 vans)
          • 10% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 2001 vans)
          • 5.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (100% worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (100% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 9.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 9.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 7.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (170% worse than other 2001 vans)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 5.8% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
          • 4.1% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 2001 vans)
          • 0.68% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.68% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (13 times worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.34% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 14% fail on Rigid brake pipes (190% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.34% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.68% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.68% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.34% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.34% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.4% fail on Lever
    • 1.0% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 1.0% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (5 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.68% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.68% fail on Pedal
    • 0.34% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.34% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.34% fail on Valves
  • 28% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 6.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.34% fail on Dipswitch
    • 4.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.0% fail on Horn
      • 1.0% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.0% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (5 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Main beam tell-tale (18 times worse than other 2001 vans)
  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.1% fail on Chassis (97% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Chassis condition (89% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 3.4% fail on Fuel system (180% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on System (5 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Pipe (4 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.34% fail on Hose
    • 1.4% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.68% fail on Towbar
      • 0.68% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.68% fail on Body
      • 0.68% fail on Other body component
    • 0.34% fail on Load security
      • 0.34% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.34% fail on Other tailgate component
    • 0.34% fail on Doors
      • 0.34% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.34% fail on Door condition
        • 0.34% fail on Catch
    • 0.34% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.34% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 13% fail on Visibility
    • 10% fail on Wipers (88% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.34% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.34% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.34% fail on Windscreen
  • 11% fail on Steering
    • 4.8% fail on Steering gear (170% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Steering rack (180% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end (68% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Locking devices (9 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.34% fail on Drag link end
    • 2.4% fail on Power steering (190% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.34% fail on Operation
      • 0.34% fail on Rams
    • 0.68% fail on Steering coupling (17 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Universal joint (20 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Steering column
  • 5.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (5 times worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.34% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.4% fail on Other leaks (7 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.34% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres
    • 4.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.68% fail on Size/type
  • 2.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (71% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.34% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.34% fail on Attachment