Nissan Vanette MOT Results

Registered in 2002
37.5% pass rate
from 200 tests in 2020
(29% worse than other 2002 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Vanette is unusually good or bad.

  • 37% fail on Suspension (74% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 25% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 14% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 8.0% fail on Leaf springs (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 7.0% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (22 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.50% fail on Leaf spring
      • 5.0% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.50% fail on Coil spring
    • 6.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.50% fail on Linkage
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.50% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 5.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.0% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (18 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.0% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.50% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.50% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.50% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.50% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 27% fail on Brakes
    • 20% fail on Brake performance (60% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 11% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 9.5% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (75% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (79% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 6.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 6.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt
          • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 6.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 5.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.50% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.50% fail on Cable
    • 1.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.0% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.50% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.50% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.50% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.50% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.50% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.50% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.50% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.50% fail on Other braking system component
  • 27% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp
    • 9.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.5% fail on Horn
      • 1.0% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 3.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.50% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.50% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.50% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.0% fail on Chassis
      • 3.0% fail on Chassis condition
    • 3.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.5% fail on Pipe (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on System
      • 0.50% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.0% fail on Body
      • 1.0% fail on Panel
      • 0.50% fail on Body condition
      • 0.50% fail on Other body component
    • 0.50% fail on Towbar
      • 0.50% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.50% fail on Seats
      • 0.50% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 12% fail on Visibility
    • 5.5% fail on Washers
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 1.0% fail on Condition of glass
      • 1.0% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.50% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (9 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.50% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.50% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.0% fail on Other leaks (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.50% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 8.0% fail on Tyres
    • 6.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.0% fail on Size/type
  • 4.5% fail on Steering
    • 3.0% fail on Steering gear
      • 3.0% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.0% fail on Power steering
      • 1.0% fail on Other components
    • 0.50% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.50% fail on Track rod end
  • 1.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plates