Nissan Vanette MOT Results
Registered in 200243.5% pass rate
from 115 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Vanette is unusually good or bad.
-
30% fail on
Suspension
(51% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 25% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
6.1% fail on
Springs
-
4.3% fail on
Leaf springs
(3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 3.5% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.87% fail on Leaf spring
- 0.87% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
- 1.7% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
4.3% fail on
Leaf springs
(3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
5.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.3% fail on Ball joint
- 0.87% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.87% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
4.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.87% fail on Linkage
-
27% fail on
Brakes
-
22% fail on
Brake performance
(74% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
11% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 11% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
10% fail on
Service brake performance
(110% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
10% fail on
Rbt
(120% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 9.6% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
10% fail on
Rbt
(120% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
5.2% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
5.2% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 4.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.2% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
4.3% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
4.3% fail on
Rbt
- 3.5% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.87% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
4.3% fail on
Rbt
- 2.6% fail on Brake performance not tested (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
11% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 14% fail on Rigid brake pipes (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
2.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads
-
1.7% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.87% fail on Brake discs
- 0.87% fail on Brake drums
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.87% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.87% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.87% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.87% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.87% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
-
0.87% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
22% fail on
Brake performance
(74% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
21% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
9.6% fail on
Headlamps
(120% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 9.6% fail on Headlamp (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.87% fail on Dipswitch
- 8.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.87% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.7% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.7% fail on Battery(ies)
-
9.6% fail on
Headlamps
(120% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
16% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
6.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 6.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 4.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.6% fail on
Cabs
(5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Chassis
- 1.7% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.7% fail on
Transmission
-
1.7% fail on
Prop shafts
- 1.7% fail on Joints (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Prop shafts
-
0.87% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.87% fail on Pipe
-
6.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
11% fail on
Visibility
- 7.8% fail on Wipers
- 2.6% fail on Washers
- 0.87% fail on Bonnet
-
7.0% fail on
Tyres
- 2.6% fail on Condition
- 2.6% fail on Tread depth
- 1.7% fail on Size/type
-
6.1% fail on
Steering
-
3.5% fail on
Steering gear
- 3.5% fail on Steering rack
-
1.7% fail on
Power steering
- 0.87% fail on Operation
- 0.87% fail on Other components
-
0.87% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.87% fail on Track rod end
-
0.87% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.87% fail on Universal joint
-
3.5% fail on
Steering gear
-
3.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.5% fail on
Compression ignition
- 3.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (13 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
3.5% fail on
Compression ignition
-
3.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.7% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.7% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.7% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.87% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.87% fail on Registration plates