Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Nissan Vanette MOT Results

Registered in 2002
46.9% pass rate
from 337 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Vanette is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Suspension (38% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 27% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 20% fail on Component mounting (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 14% fail on Spring mounting (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 5.6% fail on Leaf springs (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 4.5% fail on Shackle (11 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.89% fail on Anchor (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Spring eye (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.30% fail on Spring saddle
    • 5.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.59% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.59% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.30% fail on Attachment
    • 4.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.59% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.89% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.30% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.30% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
  • 32% fail on Brakes (43% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 22% fail on Brake performance (68% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 14% fail on Rear wheels (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 11% fail on Parking brake performance (66% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.7% fail on Front wheels (77% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 15% fail on Hydraulic systems (49% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 14% fail on Components
        • 10% fail on Pipes (67% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 4.7% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Leaks
      • 0.59% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.30% fail on Operation
    • 3.0% fail on Parking brake
      • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Restricted movement (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Hub components
      • 0.59% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.30% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.30% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.59% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.59% fail on Cable
    • 0.30% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.30% fail on Pedal
        • 0.30% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Full power hydraulic systems
      • 0.30% fail on Warning
    • 0.30% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.30% fail on Operation
  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.4% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.30% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.30% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.5% fail on Battery
    • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.5% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.89% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.59% fail on Horn
  • 9.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 5.9% fail on Body condition
    • 2.7% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.7% fail on Chassis
    • 0.59% fail on Seats
      • 0.30% fail on Passengers
      • 0.30% fail on Drivers
    • 0.30% fail on Speedometer
  • 9.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.2% fail on Cap
      • 1.2% fail on System
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions
    • 0.59% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 9.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 3.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.89% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.59% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.9% fail on Steering
    • 3.0% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Other components (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Operation
      • 0.30% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 2.1% fail on Steering system (68% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.89% fail on Track rod end (80% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.59% fail on Steering control
      • 0.30% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.30% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.30% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.30% fail on Steering operation
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Size/type (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Valve stem
  • 1.8% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (72% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts (64% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.59% fail on Condition
  • 0.30% fail on Towbars
    • 0.30% fail on Towbar
  • 0.30% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.30% fail on Condition