Peugeot Bipper MOT Results

Registered in 2009
56.8% pass rate
from 2,082 tests in 2020
(6.9% better than other 2009 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Bipper is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 7.6% fail on Springs (86% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 7.6% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 7.4% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.19% fail on Mounting (9 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (64% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (88% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (74% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 2.9% fail on Shock absorbers (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Suspension arms (62% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (52% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes (76% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint dust cover (61% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.8% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Wheel bearings (79% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.096% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.096% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.048% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.048% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.19% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (75% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.096% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.048% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.048% fail on Ball joint
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (21% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp (40% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.38% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.24% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.4% fail on Position lamps (34% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Position lamp (35% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.096% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps (31% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.91% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (57% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Rear fog lamp (57% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.91% fail on Rear fog lamp (56% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.048% fail on Switch
    • 0.91% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.43% fail on Horn
      • 0.38% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.096% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.048% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.048% fail on Switch
    • 0.048% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 10% fail on Tyres (69% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Tread depth (82% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Condition (47% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.82% fail on Size/type (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
  • 9.9% fail on Visibility
    • 7.0% fail on Washers (81% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers (29% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on View to rear
      • 0.77% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.096% fail on Indirect vision devices (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.72% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.72% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.14% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.14% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.2% fail on Brakes (51% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (50% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (41% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads (40% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Brake discs and drums (62% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.58% fail on Brake discs (61% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.096% fail on Lever
        • 0.048% fail on Cable
    • 2.0% fail on Brake performance (74% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (40% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (41% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.96% fail on Service brake performance (46% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.048% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.048% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.62% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (88% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.62% fail on Rbt (sp) (88% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (75% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Rbt (sp) (75% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.048% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance (91% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt (90% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.096% fail on Parking brake performance (95% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.096% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.048% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Pedal (180% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.62% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.62% fail on Lever
    • 0.62% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.62% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.19% fail on Rigid brake pipes (94% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.096% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.048% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.096% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.048% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.048% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.048% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 6.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (45% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.91% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (65% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.096% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.048% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.048% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 1.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.14% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.048% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.14% fail on Fluid leaks (76% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.096% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.048% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.096% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.048% fail on Sound deadening material
      • 0.048% fail on Undertray
  • 4.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (46% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Transmission (46% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Drive shafts (42% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Joints (41% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.096% fail on Prop shafts (79% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.096% fail on Joints
    • 0.82% fail on Exhaust system (55% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.82% fail on Doors
      • 0.62% fail on Front passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.62% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.19% fail on Door condition
    • 0.38% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.24% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.14% fail on Tank
    • 0.14% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.096% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.096% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.048% fail on Body
      • 0.048% fail on Other body component
    • 0.048% fail on Load security
      • 0.048% fail on Loading door
    • 0.048% fail on Floor
    • 0.048% fail on Seats
      • 0.048% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 1.6% fail on Steering (65% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.38% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
    • 0.53% fail on Steering linkage components (86% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Track rod end (85% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Power steering
      • 0.19% fail on Operation
      • 0.19% fail on Other components
      • 0.14% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.048% fail on Steering play
      • 0.048% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.62% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (73% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Seat belts (68% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
      • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas (75% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Attachment
    • 0.19% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (80% better than other 2009 vans)
  • 0.34% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.34% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.34% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Attachment