Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Peugeot Bipper MOT Results

Registered in 2010
67.6% pass rate
from 4,649 tests in 2020
(27% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Bipper is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (41% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (38% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp (58% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (36% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (34% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps (38% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp (35% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.0% fail on Position lamps (45% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Position lamp (44% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators (44% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type (44% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators (38% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Side repeaters (49% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.022% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.84% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.58% fail on Horn
      • 0.15% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.69% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Rear fog lamp (64% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.67% fail on Rear fog lamp (65% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.022% fail on Switch
    • 0.24% fail on Reversing lamps (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Reversing lamps (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.022% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.022% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 9.5% fail on Suspension (33% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Springs
      • 4.4% fail on Coil springs (79% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.3% fail on Coil spring (76% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.086% fail on Mounting (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (43% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover (52% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Linkage ball joints (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.043% fail on Pins and bushes (95% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.022% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.022% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.86% fail on Macpherson strut (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.086% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.28% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.086% fail on Other suspension component (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.043% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.19% fail on Wheel bearings (86% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.043% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.022% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.043% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (88% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.022% fail on Axles
      • 0.022% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 7.2% fail on Visibility
    • 3.8% fail on Washers
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers (26% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on View to rear
      • 0.90% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.65% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.65% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.022% fail on Window
    • 0.13% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.022% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.9% fail on Tyres (15% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.5% fail on Condition (48% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
  • 6.1% fail on Brakes (55% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (61% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (60% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (61% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.043% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.71% fail on Brake discs and drums (53% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.71% fail on Brake discs (53% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (74% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Lever
    • 1.8% fail on Brake performance (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Service brake performance (53% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.84% fail on Rbt (55% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.54% fail on Service brake performance (63% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.065% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.043% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.022% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.73% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (83% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.73% fail on Rbt (sp) (83% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Rbt (86% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.24% fail on Parking brake performance (84% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.043% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.022% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.022% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.26% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (66% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Rbt (sp) (65% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.043% fail on Service brake performance (91% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.043% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pedal (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.69% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.69% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.39% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.39% fail on Lever
    • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.19% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.043% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.086% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.043% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.043% fail on Servos
    • 0.043% fail on Rigid brake pipes (99% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.022% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.022% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.022% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.022% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.022% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.022% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 3.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (33% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (32% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Compression ignition (39% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.77% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (64% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.022% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.022% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.022% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.97% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.88% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.043% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.022% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.022% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.26% fail on Fluid leaks (54% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.043% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.022% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 3.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (52% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Transmission (51% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Drive shafts (47% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Joints (46% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.022% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.022% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.022% fail on Joints
      • 0.022% fail on Belts
    • 0.56% fail on Exhaust system (53% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Fuel system (52% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.086% fail on Tank
      • 0.022% fail on System
    • 0.24% fail on Doors
      • 0.15% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.15% fail on Door condition
      • 0.065% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.065% fail on Door condition
      • 0.022% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.022% fail on Door condition
    • 0.15% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.15% fail on Body (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Other body component
      • 0.022% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.022% fail on Panel
    • 0.13% fail on Seats
      • 0.086% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.043% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.043% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.043% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.022% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.022% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.022% fail on Chassis
      • 0.022% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.022% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.022% fail on Carrier
    • 0.022% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.022% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 2.5% fail on Steering (48% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Steering linkage components (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end (70% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.022% fail on Other components
        • 0.022% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.022% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.1% fail on Power steering (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Pipes and hoses (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Other components (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Operation
    • 0.34% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.26% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.086% fail on Operation
    • 0.043% fail on Steering play
      • 0.043% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.022% fail on Steering column
  • 0.56% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (69% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Seat belts (70% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Condition (60% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Prescribed areas (81% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (71% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.043% fail on Airbags
      • 0.043% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.43% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Attachment
    • 0.19% fail on Condition (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.30% fail on Identification of the vehicle (55% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Registration plates (55% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.022% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.022% fail on Belt(s)/padding