Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Peugeot Bipper MOT Results

Registered in 2010
69.2% pass rate
from 4,172 tests in 2017
(22% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Bipper is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (40% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (36% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Position lamps (46% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Front lamps (58% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.048% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (31% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp (57% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators (29% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type (29% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.36% fail on Side repeaters (55% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (62% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Rear fog lamp (63% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Fog lamp (63% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Horn (56% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Battery
    • 0.072% fail on Hazard warning (76% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Lamp
      • 0.048% fail on Switch
    • 0.048% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 5.1% fail on Coil springs (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Location (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Fitment
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Linkage condition (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Attachment
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms (39% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (41% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Attachment
    • 1.3% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Drive shafts (54% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Front drive shafts (54% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (54% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.024% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.77% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.22% fail on Wheel bearings (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Front (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.096% fail on Rear
    • 0.048% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.048% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.048% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.024% fail on General condition
  • 7.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.1% fail on Wipers (22% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.86% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.12% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
    • 0.072% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.0% fail on Brakes (57% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Hub components (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (61% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Brake discs (51% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.024% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake control components (92% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal (92% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Anti-slip (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.024% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Brake performance (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Front wheels (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Rear wheels (88% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.048% fail on Service brake performance (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Brake operation
    • 0.79% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.79% fail on Condition
    • 0.46% fail on ABS
    • 0.31% fail on Hydraulic systems (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Components (92% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Hoses
        • 0.048% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.024% fail on Pipes
      • 0.048% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.048% fail on Leaks
    • 0.096% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.048% fail on Lever
      • 0.048% fail on Cable
    • 0.072% fail on Prescribed areas (14 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (16 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.024% fail on Additional braking devices
    • 0.024% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.024% fail on Components
        • 0.024% fail on Servos
    • 0.024% fail on Restricted movement
  • 2.2% fail on Steering (41% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Pipes and hoses (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Operation (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Other components
      • 0.072% fail on Rams (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.70% fail on Steering system (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Track rod end (85% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.072% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.048% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.024% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.26% fail on Steering operation (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Steering control
      • 0.12% fail on Steering lock (14 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Steering column
    • 0.024% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.62% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (63% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Exhaust system (63% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Fuel system (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.096% fail on Tank
      • 0.048% fail on Cap
      • 0.048% fail on System
    • 0.072% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.048% fail on Emissions
  • 0.46% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (61% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Doors
      • 0.096% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.048% fail on Drivers
      • 0.048% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.096% fail on Body condition (80% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.072% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.048% fail on Seats
      • 0.048% fail on Drivers
    • 0.024% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.024% fail on Chassis
    • 0.024% fail on Load security
      • 0.024% fail on Loading door
  • 0.38% fail on Registration plates and VIN (53% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Registration plate (53% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.31% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (76% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Seat belts (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
      • 0.048% fail on Attachment
    • 0.024% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.024% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.22% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.14% fail on Attachment
    • 0.072% fail on Condition