Peugeot Bipper MOT Results
Registered in 201059.8% pass rate
from 4,175 tests in 2021
(13% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Bipper is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Suspension
(11% better than other 2010 vans)
-
7.3% fail on
Springs
(52% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
7.3% fail on
Coil springs
(150% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 7.3% fail on Coil spring (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.072% fail on Mounting
- 0.024% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
7.3% fail on
Coil springs
(150% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
3.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(38% better than other 2010 vans)
- 2.6% fail on Ball joint
- 0.55% fail on Pins and bushes (75% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Ball joint dust cover (56% better than other 2010 vans)
-
3.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(44% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (39% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.55% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.24% fail on Ball joint (63% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Linkage
- 0.024% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.024% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.024% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Macpherson strut
(2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.62% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.67% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (44% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.43% fail on Wheel bearings (74% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.19% fail on
Other suspension component
(69% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.072% fail on Ball joint (81% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.048% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.048% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.024% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.072% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.048% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.024% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.048% fail on
Axles
- 0.024% fail on Axle
- 0.024% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.024% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.024% fail on Pins and bushes
-
7.3% fail on
Springs
(52% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(27% better than other 2010 vans)
- 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (18% better than other 2010 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Stop lamp (40% better than other 2010 vans)
-
2.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.26% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamps
(34% better than other 2010 vans)
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp (29% better than other 2010 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.43% fail on Side repeaters (51% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.096% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.024% fail on Switch
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.3% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(42% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(42% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (42% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(42% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.69% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.36% fail on Horn
- 0.34% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.38% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.38% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.17% fail on
Position lamps
(61% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Position lamp (65% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.048% fail on Switch
-
0.072% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.048% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
- 0.024% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.024% fail on Rear reflectors
-
10% fail on
Visibility
(16% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 5.8% fail on Washers (39% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 3.9% fail on Wipers
-
1.0% fail on
View to rear
- 1.0% fail on Mirrors
- 0.024% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
0.46% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.46% fail on Windscreen
- 0.17% fail on Bonnet
-
8.3% fail on
Tyres
(35% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 4.7% fail on Tread depth (28% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 3.9% fail on Condition (49% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Size/type
-
6.4% fail on
Brakes
(56% better than other 2010 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Brake performance
(67% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake performance
(45% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
(44% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.96% fail on Service brake performance (49% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.46% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
(44% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(78% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (78% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.50% fail on
Parking brake performance
(74% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.46% fail on
Rbt
(76% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance (75% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.024% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.048% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.048% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.46% fail on
Rbt
(76% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.26% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(74% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.26% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(74% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.096% fail on Service brake performance (85% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.26% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(74% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.048% fail on Brake performance not tested (83% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake performance
(45% better than other 2010 vans)
-
2.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(55% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(47% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads (48% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.024% fail on Brake linings
-
0.62% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(62% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.62% fail on Brake discs (62% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.048% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(89% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.024% fail on Cable
- 0.024% fail on Lever
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(47% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(110% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Pedal (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.36% fail on Hand lever (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.72% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.72% fail on Lever
-
0.62% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(55% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.60% fail on Anti-lock braking system (50% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.024% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.072% fail on Rigid brake pipes (98% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.072% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.048% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.024% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.048% fail on Flexible brake hoses (81% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.024% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.024% fail on Operation
-
0.024% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.024% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.024% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.024% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.024% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
0.024% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
2.5% fail on
Brake performance
(67% better than other 2010 vans)
-
4.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(26% better than other 2010 vans)
-
4.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(24% better than other 2010 vans)
-
3.4% fail on
Compression ignition
(25% better than other 2010 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.74% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (61% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.43% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.024% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.91% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.81% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.048% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.048% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.4% fail on
Compression ignition
(25% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.31% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.19% fail on Engine oil leaks (59% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.072% fail on Other leaks
- 0.048% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
0.024% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.024% fail on Undertray
-
4.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(24% better than other 2010 vans)
-
4.2% fail on
Steering
(21% better than other 2010 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
(48% better than other 2010 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Track rod end (48% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.072% fail on Ball joint
- 0.048% fail on Drag link end
- 0.024% fail on Steering arm
- 0.024% fail on Lock stop
-
1.1% fail on
Steering gear
(130% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.98% fail on Steering rack (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.072% fail on Operation
-
0.98% fail on
Power steering
(130% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.55% fail on Pipes and hoses (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Other components
- 0.17% fail on Operation
- 0.048% fail on Rams
- 0.024% fail on Pump
-
0.14% fail on
Steering play
- 0.14% fail on Steering rack
-
2.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
(48% better than other 2010 vans)
-
3.9% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(51% better than other 2010 vans)
-
2.0% fail on
Transmission
(49% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(45% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Joints (44% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.096% fail on
Prop shafts
(81% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.096% fail on Joints
-
1.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(45% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.77% fail on Exhaust system (48% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.29% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(62% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.29% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (62% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.29% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.22% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.096% fail on Tank
-
0.29% fail on
Doors
-
0.22% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.22% fail on Door condition
-
0.048% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.048% fail on Door condition
-
0.024% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.024% fail on Door condition
-
0.22% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.17% fail on
Body
(62% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Other body component
- 0.048% fail on Panel
-
0.14% fail on
Chassis
(69% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Chassis condition (69% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.14% fail on
Seats
- 0.12% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.048% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.096% fail on Bumpers
-
0.096% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.096% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
2.0% fail on
Transmission
(49% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(43% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.72% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.31% fail on Condition (53% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.048% fail on Attachment
- 0.024% fail on Requirements
- 0.29% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (68% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.53% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.53% fail on Registration plates
-
0.19% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.096% fail on Condition
- 0.096% fail on Attachment