MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Bipper » 2010

Peugeot Bipper MOT Results

Registered in 2010
59.8% pass rate
from 4,175 tests in 2021
(13% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Bipper is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Suspension (11% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Springs (52% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Coil springs (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 7.3% fail on Coil spring (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.072% fail on Mounting
      • 0.024% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.6% fail on Suspension arms (38% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.55% fail on Pins and bushes (75% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint dust cover (56% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (44% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (39% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.55% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint (63% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage
      • 0.024% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.024% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.024% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (44% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Wheel bearings (74% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Other suspension component (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Ball joint (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.048% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.024% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.072% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.048% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.024% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.048% fail on Axles
      • 0.024% fail on Axle
      • 0.024% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.024% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.024% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (27% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (18% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp (40% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps (34% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp (29% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.43% fail on Side repeaters (51% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.096% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.024% fail on Switch
    • 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (42% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (42% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (42% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.36% fail on Horn
      • 0.34% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.38% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.38% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.17% fail on Position lamps (61% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Position lamp (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Switch
    • 0.072% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.048% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.024% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.024% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 10% fail on Visibility (16% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Washers (39% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.0% fail on View to rear
      • 1.0% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.024% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.46% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.46% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.17% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.3% fail on Tyres (35% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth (28% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Condition (49% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Size/type
  • 6.4% fail on Brakes (56% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Brake performance (67% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (45% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (44% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.96% fail on Service brake performance (49% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (78% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Parking brake performance (74% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.46% fail on Rbt (76% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance (75% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.024% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.048% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.048% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.26% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (74% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Rbt (sp) (74% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.096% fail on Service brake performance (85% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Brake performance not tested (83% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (55% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (47% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads (48% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.024% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.62% fail on Brake discs and drums (62% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.62% fail on Brake discs (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (89% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.024% fail on Cable
        • 0.024% fail on Lever
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Pedal (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Hand lever (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.72% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.72% fail on Lever
    • 0.62% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (55% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Anti-lock braking system (50% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.072% fail on Rigid brake pipes (98% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.072% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.048% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.024% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.048% fail on Flexible brake hoses (81% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.024% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.024% fail on Operation
    • 0.024% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.024% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.024% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.024% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.024% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 4.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (26% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (24% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Compression ignition (25% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.74% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (61% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.024% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.91% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.81% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.048% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.048% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.31% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.19% fail on Engine oil leaks (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.048% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.024% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.024% fail on Undertray
  • 4.2% fail on Steering (21% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Steering linkage components (48% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end (48% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.048% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.024% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.024% fail on Lock stop
    • 1.1% fail on Steering gear (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.98% fail on Steering rack (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Operation
    • 0.98% fail on Power steering (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Pipes and hoses (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Other components
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
      • 0.048% fail on Rams
      • 0.024% fail on Pump
    • 0.14% fail on Steering play
      • 0.14% fail on Steering rack
  • 3.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (51% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Transmission (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Drive shafts (45% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Joints (44% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.096% fail on Prop shafts (81% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.096% fail on Joints
    • 0.77% fail on Exhaust system (48% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Integral vehicle structure (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (62% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.096% fail on Tank
    • 0.29% fail on Doors
      • 0.22% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.22% fail on Door condition
      • 0.048% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.048% fail on Door condition
      • 0.024% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.024% fail on Door condition
    • 0.17% fail on Body (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
      • 0.048% fail on Panel
    • 0.14% fail on Chassis (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Chassis condition (69% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Seats
      • 0.12% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.048% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.096% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.096% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.096% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (43% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.72% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.31% fail on Condition (53% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Attachment
      • 0.024% fail on Requirements
    • 0.29% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (68% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.53% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.53% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.19% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.096% fail on Condition
    • 0.096% fail on Attachment