Peugeot Bipper MOT Results
Registered in 201266.8% pass rate
from 2,020 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Bipper is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(35% better than other 2012 vans)
- 7.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (28% better than other 2012 vans)
-
3.0% fail on
Position lamps
(59% better than other 2012 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Front lamps (62% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.89% fail on Rear lamps (45% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.050% fail on All position lamps
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (37% better than other 2012 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Stop lamp (53% better than other 2012 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.25% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.20% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.69% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.69% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.050% fail on Tell tale
-
0.69% fail on
Headlamps
(74% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.64% fail on Headlamp (75% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.050% fail on Switch
- 0.15% fail on Horn
- 0.099% fail on Battery
- 0.050% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.050% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.050% fail on Switch
-
11% fail on
Suspension
(31% worse than other 2012 vans)
-
5.9% fail on
Coil springs
(3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
- 5.9% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
-
2.9% fail on
Shock absorbers
(2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
- 2.9% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Macpherson strut
(2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
-
0.84% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(63% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.69% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (55% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (78% better than other 2012 vans)
-
0.50% fail on
Suspension arms
(63% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.45% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (66% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.050% fail on Condition
-
0.45% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.25% fail on Front (65% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Rear
- 0.45% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.30% fail on
Drive shafts
(84% better than other 2012 vans)
-
0.30% fail on
Front drive shafts
(84% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Constant velocity joints (87% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.050% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.30% fail on
Front drive shafts
(84% better than other 2012 vans)
-
0.15% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
5.9% fail on
Coil springs
(3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
-
8.8% fail on
Tyres
(67% worse than other 2012 vans)
- 5.1% fail on Tread depth (74% worse than other 2012 vans)
- 4.0% fail on Condition (67% worse than other 2012 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Size/type
- 0.25% fail on Valve stem
-
7.1% fail on
Brakes
-
3.0% fail on
Hub components
- 2.6% fail on Brake pads
- 0.69% fail on Brake discs
- 0.050% fail on Brake linings
- 0.050% fail on Brake calipers
-
1.8% fail on
Service brake control components
(190% worse than other 2012 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Pedal
(190% worse than other 2012 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Anti-slip (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
- 0.050% fail on Condition
-
1.8% fail on
Pedal
(190% worse than other 2012 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Brake performance
(54% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.64% fail on Front wheels
- 0.50% fail on Rear wheels (63% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.50% fail on Parking brake performance (76% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.30% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.050% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake
(98% worse than other 2012 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Condition (99% worse than other 2012 vans)
- 0.40% fail on ABS
-
0.20% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(84% better than other 2012 vans)
-
0.20% fail on
Components
(82% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.099% fail on Hoses
- 0.050% fail on Pipes
- 0.050% fail on Reservoirs
-
0.20% fail on
Components
(82% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.050% fail on Restricted movement
-
3.0% fail on
Hub components
-
6.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 2.9% fail on Washers
- 2.5% fail on Wipers (30% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.99% fail on Windscreen
- 0.59% fail on Mirrors
- 0.050% fail on Bonnet
-
2.0% fail on
Steering
-
0.94% fail on
Power steering
(3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
- 0.54% fail on Pipes and hoses (5 times worse than other 2012 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
- 0.099% fail on Other components
- 0.59% fail on Steering operation (7 times worse than other 2012 vans)
-
0.54% fail on
Steering system
(61% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Track rod end (62% better than other 2012 vans)
- 0.099% fail on Steering rack
- 0.050% fail on Ball joint
-
0.94% fail on
Power steering
(3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
-
0.64% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
-
0.35% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.20% fail on Cap
- 0.099% fail on System
- 0.050% fail on Pipe
- 0.15% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.35% fail on
Fuel system
-
0.50% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.50% fail on Registration plate
-
0.40% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(59% better than other 2012 vans)
-
0.20% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.20% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.20% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.15% fail on Condition
- 0.050% fail on Attachment
-
0.20% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.30% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.15% fail on Condition
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
-
0.30% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(67% better than other 2012 vans)
-
0.15% fail on
Doors
- 0.099% fail on Passengers front
- 0.050% fail on Passengers other
-
0.099% fail on
Seats
- 0.099% fail on Drivers
- 0.050% fail on Body condition
-
0.15% fail on
Doors
-
0.050% fail on
Towbars
- 0.050% fail on Towbar