Peugeot Bipper MOT Results

Registered in 2016
66.8% pass rate
from 1,517 tests in 2020
(33% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Bipper is unusually good or bad.

  • 10.0% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (15% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim (31% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim (39% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (99% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Stop lamp (26% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (34% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (31% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.66% fail on Direction indicators (46% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Flashing type (46% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.46% fail on Individual direction indicators (23% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Side repeaters (77% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (14% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Rear fog lamp (14% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.46% fail on Rear fog lamp (23% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.066% fail on Switch
    • 0.33% fail on Reversing lamps (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Reversing lamps (82% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.20% fail on Electrical equipment (29% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Horn (0.65% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.066% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.066% fail on Position lamp
  • 7.4% fail on Suspension (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Coil springs (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Coil spring (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Linkage ball joints (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint dust cover (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Linkage
      • 0.066% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.92% fail on Macpherson strut (17 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Pins and bushes (34 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.59% fail on Suspension arms (23% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint (21% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes (22% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.53% fail on Shock absorbers (19% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes (35 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.13% fail on Wheel bearings (21% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.066% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.066% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.066% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 7.3% fail on Tyres (66% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Condition (94% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth (48% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.066% fail on Size/type
  • 6.2% fail on Brakes (5.8% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Pedal (7 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Hand lever (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (30% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (35% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads (34% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Brake discs and drums (47% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.40% fail on Brake discs (47% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.066% fail on Lever
    • 1.5% fail on Brake performance (30% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Service brake performance (30% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.92% fail on Rbt (33% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake performance (12% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.33% fail on Service brake imbalance (69% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (69% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt (sp) (68% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (38% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Rbt (sp) (44% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake imbalance (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.066% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.26% fail on Parking brake performance (28% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Rbt (25% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.20% fail on Parking brake performance (34% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.066% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.066% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.59% fail on Parking brake control (83% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Lever (83% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (28% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Electronic stability control (2.2% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Anti-lock braking system (49% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 5.8% fail on Visibility (16% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers (28% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Washers (21% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on View to rear (19% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Mirrors (21% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Condition of glass (6.7% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Windscreen (7.8% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.066% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.066% fail on Bonnet
  • 2.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (51% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (53% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Compression ignition (72% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.92% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (7.1% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.79% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Spark ignition (6.4% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.40% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (9.1% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.066% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.13% fail on Fluid leaks (23% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Engine oil leaks (65% worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 1.7% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Power steering (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses (55% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Pump
    • 0.26% fail on Steering gear (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.79% fail on Body, chassis, structure (48% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Exhaust system (54% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Transmission (55% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Drive shafts (51% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Joints (50% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.066% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.066% fail on System
    • 0.066% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.066% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.066% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.066% fail on Doors
      • 0.066% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.066% fail on Door condition
    • 0.066% fail on Seats
      • 0.066% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 0.59% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (22% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Seat belts (2.2% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Condition (9.6% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.066% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.20% fail on Identification of the vehicle (32% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Registration plates (31% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.13% fail on Road Wheels (3.0% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Condition (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.066% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.066% fail on Doors
      • 0.066% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors