Peugeot Bipper MOT Results

Registered in 2016
73.9% pass rate
from 1,587 tests in 2020
(18% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Bipper is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.063% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.69% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.69% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.50% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.19% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.38% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.063% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.32% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.32% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.19% fail on Horn
      • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.063% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.063% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.063% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.063% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 6.2% fail on Visibility (46% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.44% fail on View to rear
      • 0.44% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.32% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.32% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.19% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.13% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.9% fail on Brakes
    • 2.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Pedal (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Hand lever (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.063% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.50% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.50% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.44% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.44% fail on Rbt
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.44% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.44% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt
          • 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.13% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.13% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.063% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.063% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.38% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.38% fail on Lever
    • 0.19% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.19% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.063% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.063% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.063% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 5.3% fail on Tyres (34% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
  • 3.0% fail on Suspension
    • 0.88% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.44% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.063% fail on Linkage
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.76% fail on Springs
      • 0.76% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.76% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.69% fail on Macpherson strut (15 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (25 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Macpherson strut (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.25% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.063% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.063% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.19% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.13% fail on Shock absorbers (78% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.063% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint
  • 1.8% fail on Steering (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Steering gear (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Operation (24 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.13% fail on Power steering
      • 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.063% fail on Steering play
      • 0.063% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.82% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.19% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.063% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.19% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.19% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.57% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.50% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
      • 0.063% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.063% fail on Requirements
    • 0.13% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.50% fail on Body, chassis, structure (63% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Transmission
      • 0.13% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.13% fail on Joints
    • 0.13% fail on Doors
      • 0.063% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.063% fail on Door condition
      • 0.063% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.063% fail on Hinge
    • 0.063% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.063% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.063% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.063% fail on Seats
      • 0.063% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.063% fail on Undertray
  • 0.19% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.19% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.063% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.063% fail on Attachment