MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Bipper » 2016

Peugeot Bipper MOT Results

Registered in 2016
65.6% pass rate
from 1,476 tests in 2021
(28% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Bipper is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.95% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.95% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.61% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.41% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.34% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.34% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.34% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.14% fail on Horn
      • 0.068% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.14% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.068% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.068% fail on Switch
    • 0.068% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.068% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.068% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 9.6% fail on Suspension (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 4.7% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Linkage
    • 1.4% fail on Macpherson strut (20 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (16 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Pins and bushes (21 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Macpherson strut (36 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.75% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.14% fail on Suspension arm (15 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.34% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.27% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.068% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.068% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 8.2% fail on Tyres (76% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Tread depth (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Condition (65% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.068% fail on Size/type
  • 7.7% fail on Brakes
    • 3.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Pedal (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Hand lever (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.88% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.81% fail on Rbt
          • 0.47% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.41% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.068% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.068% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.81% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (50% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.81% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.47% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.47% fail on Rbt
          • 0.34% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.27% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.27% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.068% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.47% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.47% fail on Lever
    • 0.20% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.14% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.14% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.068% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 6.6% fail on Visibility
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.54% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.54% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.20% fail on View to rear
      • 0.14% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.068% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.14% fail on Bonnet
  • 2.6% fail on Steering (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Steering linkage components (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.068% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.68% fail on Steering gear (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Operation (45 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Power steering
      • 0.068% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.068% fail on Pump
      • 0.068% fail on Other components
  • 2.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.95% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.61% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.20% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.068% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.34% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.34% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.068% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.068% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.54% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Front passenger's door (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Door condition (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
      • 0.068% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.068% fail on Door condition
    • 0.47% fail on Transmission
      • 0.41% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.41% fail on Joints
      • 0.068% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.068% fail on Joints
    • 0.20% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.14% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.068% fail on Tank
    • 0.14% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.14% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.068% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.068% fail on Carrier
    • 0.068% fail on Seats
      • 0.068% fail on Driver's seat
  • 0.47% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.41% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
    • 0.068% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.20% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.20% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.14% fail on Attachment
    • 0.068% fail on Condition