Peugeot Boxer MOT Results
Registered in 199552.8% pass rate
from 875 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Boxer is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(14% better than other 1995 vans)
-
5.5% fail on
Direction indicators
(64% worse than other 1995 vans)
-
5.5% fail on
Flashing type
(64% worse than other 1995 vans)
- 3.2% fail on Side repeaters (170% worse than other 1995 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.57% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.11% fail on Tell tales
-
5.5% fail on
Flashing type
(64% worse than other 1995 vans)
-
5.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.7% fail on Rear lamps
- 2.6% fail on Front lamps
- 0.23% fail on All position lamps
- 4.3% fail on Horn
- 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim (40% better than other 1995 vans)
-
3.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(48% better than other 1995 vans)
- 3.5% fail on Fog lamp (47% better than other 1995 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Tell tale
- 3.1% fail on Battery
- 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamps
(48% better than other 1995 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp (49% better than other 1995 vans)
-
0.11% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.11% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
1.1% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.91% fail on Switch
- 0.34% fail on Lamp
- 0.11% fail on Tell tale
- 0.46% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
5.5% fail on
Direction indicators
(64% worse than other 1995 vans)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
9.0% fail on
Brake performance
- 3.9% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.3% fail on Front wheels (56% better than other 1995 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.69% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.46% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.11% fail on Brake operation
-
8.9% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
8.1% fail on
Components
- 5.3% fail on Pipes
- 2.3% fail on Hoses
- 0.80% fail on Valves
- 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
- 1.1% fail on Leaks
- 0.11% fail on Operation
-
8.1% fail on
Components
-
1.0% fail on
Hub components
- 0.46% fail on Brake pads
- 0.46% fail on Brake discs
- 0.11% fail on Brake linings
- 0.11% fail on Brake calipers
-
0.80% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.80% fail on Condition
-
0.57% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(4 times worse than other 1995 vans)
-
0.34% fail on
Components
(4 times worse than other 1995 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Servos
- 0.11% fail on Pipes
- 0.23% fail on Leaks (6 times worse than other 1995 vans)
-
0.34% fail on
Components
(4 times worse than other 1995 vans)
-
0.34% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.34% fail on
Pedal
- 0.34% fail on Condition
-
0.34% fail on
Pedal
-
0.23% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.11% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.11% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
-
0.11% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.11% fail on Cable
- 0.11% fail on Restricted movement
-
9.0% fail on
Brake performance
-
17% fail on
Suspension
(26% better than other 1995 vans)
-
11% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 6.9% fail on Component mounting
- 3.7% fail on Spring mounting
- 3.7% fail on Subframe mounting (64% worse than other 1995 vans)
-
1.9% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.3% fail on Rear
- 0.80% fail on Front
-
1.5% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 1.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
1.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
1.4% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.4% fail on Condition
-
1.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(58% better than other 1995 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (56% better than other 1995 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.34% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.23% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on Securing bolts
-
0.34% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.34% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on General condition
-
0.11% fail on
Axles
- 0.11% fail on Clearance
-
11% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
14% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(28% worse than other 1995 vans)
- 9.1% fail on Wipers (36% worse than other 1995 vans)
- 5.9% fail on Washers (53% worse than other 1995 vans)
- 0.46% fail on Windscreen
- 0.11% fail on Mirrors
-
8.0% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
4.1% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 4.1% fail on Chassis
- 3.4% fail on Body condition
-
0.46% fail on
Seats
- 0.34% fail on Drivers
- 0.11% fail on Passengers
- 0.11% fail on Body security
-
0.11% fail on
Doors
- 0.11% fail on Passengers front
-
4.1% fail on
Vehicle structure
-
8.0% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 4.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.9% fail on Emissions
- 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.69% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.34% fail on Cap
- 0.11% fail on Tank
- 0.11% fail on Hose
- 0.11% fail on System
-
5.4% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
5.4% fail on
Seat belts
- 4.5% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.80% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on Attachment
-
5.4% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.8% fail on
Tyres
- 3.0% fail on Condition
- 0.69% fail on Tread depth (74% better than other 1995 vans)
- 0.11% fail on Size/type
-
3.1% fail on
Steering
(55% better than other 1995 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Steering system
(68% better than other 1995 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Track rod end
- 0.69% fail on Steering rack (67% better than other 1995 vans)
-
0.91% fail on
Power steering
- 0.57% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.46% fail on Operation
- 0.11% fail on Pump
-
0.34% fail on
Steering control
-
0.23% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.23% fail on Universal joint
- 0.11% fail on Steering column
-
0.23% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.11% fail on Steering operation
-
1.7% fail on
Steering system
(68% better than other 1995 vans)
-
0.69% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.69% fail on Registration plate
-
0.34% fail on
Towbars
- 0.34% fail on Towbar
-
0.11% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.11% fail on Attachment