MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Boxer » 1995

Peugeot Boxer MOT Results

Registered in 1995
51.4% pass rate
from 900 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Boxer is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.2% fail on Direction indicators (48% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Flashing type (48% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Side repeaters (130% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.56% fail on All direction indicators
    • 6.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.3% fail on Horn
      • 2.9% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.44% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp levelling device (3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim (40% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (60% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (60% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (60% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.56% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.56% fail on Switch
    • 0.33% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.11% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.22% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.22% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.22% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.22% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.22% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.1% fail on Rbt
          • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 5.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.22% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.22% fail on Rbt
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 5.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (49% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.56% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.44% fail on Cable
        • 0.11% fail on Lever
      • 0.22% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.22% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.67% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.67% fail on Lever
    • 0.67% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.56% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.44% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.11% fail on Pedal
    • 0.56% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.44% fail on Valves
      • 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.56% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.22% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.22% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.22% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.11% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.11% fail on Servos
  • 16% fail on Visibility (41% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 11% fail on Wipers (69% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.11% fail on Bonnet
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 8.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.3% fail on Sub-frames (190% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Sub-frame
    • 2.7% fail on Springs
      • 1.7% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (120% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.44% fail on Leaf spring (4 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.11% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.11% fail on Shackle bracket
        • 0.11% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 0.33% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.33% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.6% fail on Suspension arms (59% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Ball joint dust cover (60% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Ball joint (66% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.11% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.56% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.22% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (5 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Suspension unit
      • 0.11% fail on Bellows
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.4% fail on Chassis
      • 5.3% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.33% fail on Strengthening plate (4 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.22% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.22% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 3.3% fail on Transmission
      • 3.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.2% fail on Joints
        • 0.11% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.89% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.44% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.22% fail on Pipe
      • 0.11% fail on Hose
      • 0.11% fail on System
    • 0.44% fail on Seats
      • 0.22% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.22% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.33% fail on Body
      • 0.22% fail on Other body component
      • 0.11% fail on Panel
    • 0.33% fail on Doors
      • 0.22% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.22% fail on Door condition
      • 0.11% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
    • 0.22% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.22% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.11% fail on Cabs
      • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.1% fail on Spark ignition (97% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (140% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.67% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.33% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.33% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.11% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.67% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.44% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 4.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
      • 0.33% fail on Attachment
  • 2.8% fail on Steering (54% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Power steering
      • 1.0% fail on Pipes and hoses (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Operation
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
    • 1.0% fail on Steering linkage components (62% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.44% fail on Steering gear (80% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Steering rack (80% better than other 1995 vans)
  • 2.2% fail on Tyres
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.56% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
  • 0.56% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.44% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.11% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.11% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.11% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment