MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Boxer » 1995
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Peugeot Boxer MOT Results

Registered in 1995
54.6% pass rate
from 970 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Boxer is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.5% fail on Horn
      • 2.7% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 1.0% fail on Electrical wiring (190% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Direction indicators (84% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Flashing type (84% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.41% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp levelling device (6 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (69% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (69% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (68% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Switch
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (62% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.72% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.72% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.41% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.41% fail on Switch
    • 0.21% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt
          • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.21% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.93% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.31% fail on Rbt
          • 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 5.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (46% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.62% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.62% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.52% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.52% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.52% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.31% fail on Cable
        • 0.10% fail on Rod
        • 0.10% fail on Pivot
    • 0.93% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.72% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.41% fail on Valves (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.10% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.52% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.31% fail on Pedal
      • 0.21% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.31% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.21% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.21% fail on Lever
    • 0.21% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.10% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.10% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.21% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.10% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.10% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.10% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.10% fail on Servos
  • 15% fail on Suspension (23% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 8.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings (76% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms (48% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint (60% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint dust cover (66% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.21% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.1% fail on Springs
      • 1.0% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.10% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.10% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 0.31% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.10% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.10% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage ball joints
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.3% fail on Chassis
      • 3.1% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.21% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 2.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.31% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.31% fail on Sub-frame condition
      • 0.21% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 2.0% fail on Transmission
      • 1.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.6% fail on Joints
        • 0.21% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.10% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.10% fail on Joints
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.41% fail on System
      • 0.31% fail on Pipe
      • 0.31% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.31% fail on Body
      • 0.21% fail on Other body component
      • 0.10% fail on Body condition
    • 0.31% fail on Cabs
      • 0.31% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.21% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.21% fail on Doors
      • 0.10% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.10% fail on Door condition
      • 0.10% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.10% fail on Hinge
    • 0.10% fail on Towbar
      • 0.10% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.10% fail on Floor
    • 0.10% fail on Seats
      • 0.10% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 14% fail on Visibility (33% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 7.6% fail on Wipers
    • 6.3% fail on Washers (55% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.21% fail on View to rear
      • 0.21% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.10% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.10% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.10% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.9% fail on Spark ignition (190% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.72% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.62% fail on Compression ignition (72% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.10% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.10% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.10% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.10% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.31% fail on Fluid leaks (76% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 2.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (46% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts (46% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas (49% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Condition
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment
  • 2.3% fail on Steering (62% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Steering linkage components (64% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Track rod end (54% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.72% fail on Steering gear (63% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Steering rack (78% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Operation
    • 0.72% fail on Power steering
      • 0.41% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.31% fail on Other components
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
    • 0.10% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.10% fail on Universal joint
  • 1.4% fail on Tyres (63% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.31% fail on Tread depth (84% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Size/type
  • 0.10% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.10% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.10% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.10% fail on Speedometer