Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Peugeot Boxer MOT Results

Registered in 1995
52.8% pass rate
from 875 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Boxer is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (14% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Direction indicators (64% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Flashing type (64% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 3.2% fail on Side repeaters (170% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.57% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.11% fail on Tell tales
    • 5.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Rear lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.23% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.3% fail on Horn
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim (40% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (48% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Fog lamp (47% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Tell tale
    • 3.1% fail on Battery
    • 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps (48% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp (49% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.11% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.1% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.91% fail on Switch
      • 0.34% fail on Lamp
      • 0.11% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.46% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 9.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.3% fail on Front wheels (56% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.69% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.46% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.11% fail on Brake operation
    • 8.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 8.1% fail on Components
        • 5.3% fail on Pipes
        • 2.3% fail on Hoses
        • 0.80% fail on Valves
        • 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.1% fail on Leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
    • 1.0% fail on Hub components
      • 0.46% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.46% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.11% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.11% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.80% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.80% fail on Condition
    • 0.57% fail on Air and vacuum systems (4 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Components (4 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Servos
        • 0.11% fail on Pipes
      • 0.23% fail on Leaks (6 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.34% fail on Pedal
        • 0.34% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.11% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.11% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
    • 0.11% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.11% fail on Cable
    • 0.11% fail on Restricted movement
  • 17% fail on Suspension (26% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 11% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 6.9% fail on Component mounting
      • 3.7% fail on Spring mounting
      • 3.7% fail on Subframe mounting (64% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.3% fail on Rear
      • 0.80% fail on Front
    • 1.5% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.5% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 1.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms (58% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (56% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.34% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Securing bolts
    • 0.34% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on General condition
    • 0.11% fail on Axles
      • 0.11% fail on Clearance
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road (28% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 9.1% fail on Wipers (36% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Washers (53% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.11% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.1% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 4.1% fail on Chassis
    • 3.4% fail on Body condition
    • 0.46% fail on Seats
      • 0.34% fail on Drivers
      • 0.11% fail on Passengers
    • 0.11% fail on Body security
    • 0.11% fail on Doors
      • 0.11% fail on Passengers front
  • 8.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.9% fail on Emissions
    • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.69% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.34% fail on Cap
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.11% fail on Hose
      • 0.11% fail on System
  • 5.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 5.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.80% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.69% fail on Tread depth (74% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
  • 3.1% fail on Steering (55% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Steering system (68% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.69% fail on Steering rack (67% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.91% fail on Power steering
      • 0.57% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.46% fail on Operation
      • 0.11% fail on Pump
    • 0.34% fail on Steering control
      • 0.23% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.23% fail on Universal joint
      • 0.11% fail on Steering column
    • 0.11% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.69% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.69% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.34% fail on Towbars
    • 0.34% fail on Towbar
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment