Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Peugeot Boxer MOT Results

Registered in 1998
56.8% pass rate
from 1,358 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Boxer is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.1% fail on Electrical equipment (33% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Horn (52% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.44% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.15% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp levelling device (3 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp (52% better than other 1998 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim (30% better than other 1998 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.074% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.37% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.074% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (50% better than other 1998 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (50% better than other 1998 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (51% better than other 1998 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Switch
    • 1.5% fail on Outline marker lamps (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Outline marker lamp (200% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on All outline marker lamps
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (55% better than other 1998 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.29% fail on Switch
    • 0.074% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.074% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.074% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 15% fail on Brakes (17% better than other 1998 vans)
    • 9.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.0% fail on Rbt
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (62% worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 0.074% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.074% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.074% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.074% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.074% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.074% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (75% better than other 1998 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (75% better than other 1998 vans)
        • 0.074% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.52% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.22% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 1998 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Rbt (86% better than other 1998 vans)
          • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 1998 vans)
          • 0.074% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 5.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (60% better than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.81% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.52% fail on Brake linings and pads (65% better than other 1998 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Brake pads (64% better than other 1998 vans)
    • 0.74% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.59% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.59% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.44% fail on Other braking system component
        • 0.15% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.52% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.22% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.22% fail on Valves
      • 0.074% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.29% fail on Load sensing valves (83% better than other 1998 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.22% fail on Lever
    • 0.074% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.074% fail on Hand lever
  • 14% fail on Suspension (25% better than other 1998 vans)
    • 8.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.4% fail on Sub-frames (120% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (150% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms (74% better than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint (88% better than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.96% fail on Springs (60% better than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.074% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.074% fail on Spring saddle
      • 0.074% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.074% fail on Mounting
    • 0.15% fail on Other suspension component (81% better than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.074% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.074% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.074% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.074% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (25% better than other 1998 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.2% fail on Chassis
      • 4.1% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.15% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.074% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 1.4% fail on Transmission (66% better than other 1998 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Drive shafts (56% better than other 1998 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Joints (58% better than other 1998 vans)
        • 0.074% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.074% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.074% fail on Joints
    • 0.66% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.29% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.15% fail on Hose
      • 0.074% fail on Tank
      • 0.074% fail on Pipe
      • 0.074% fail on System
    • 0.37% fail on Towbar
      • 0.22% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.15% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.15% fail on Floor
    • 0.15% fail on Seats (79% better than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.074% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.074% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.15% fail on Cabs
      • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.074% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.074% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.074% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.074% fail on Body
      • 0.074% fail on Other body component
    • 0.074% fail on Doors
      • 0.074% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.074% fail on Door condition
  • 9.2% fail on Visibility
    • 5.2% fail on Washers
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.22% fail on View to rear
      • 0.22% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.15% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.15% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.074% fail on Driver's view
  • 3.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
      • 0.074% fail on Attachment
      • 0.074% fail on Requirements
  • 3.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (35% better than other 1998 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.2% fail on Spark ignition (80% worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Catalyst emissions (85% worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.15% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.88% fail on Compression ignition (71% better than other 1998 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (85% better than other 1998 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.22% fail on Fluid leaks (79% better than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 2.1% fail on Tyres (55% better than other 1998 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.81% fail on Tread depth (68% better than other 1998 vans)
    • 0.074% fail on Size/type
  • 1.8% fail on Steering (68% better than other 1998 vans)
    • 0.74% fail on Power steering
      • 0.37% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.22% fail on Other components
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
      • 0.074% fail on Pump
    • 0.52% fail on Steering linkage components (83% better than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Track rod end (84% better than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.074% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.074% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.29% fail on Steering gear (84% better than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Steering rack (83% better than other 1998 vans)
    • 0.074% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.074% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.074% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.074% fail on Steering play
      • 0.074% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.44% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.44% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.074% fail on Condition
    • 0.074% fail on Attachment
  • 0.074% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.074% fail on Steps and stairs
      • 0.074% fail on Stairs