MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Boxer » 1999
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Peugeot Boxer MOT Results

Registered in 1999
58.6% pass rate
from 1,446 tests in 2020
(9.9% better than other 1999 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Boxer is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (18% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Electrical equipment (60% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Horn (100% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.48% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 3.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.28% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (44% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.069% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps (41% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (73% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.069% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp (48% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (61% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (61% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (60% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (46% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.97% fail on Outline marker lamps (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Outline marker lamp (140% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.069% fail on All outline marker lamps
    • 0.28% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.28% fail on Switch
    • 0.069% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 14% fail on Suspension (24% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 9.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.0% fail on Sub-frames (110% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (150% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.069% fail on Sub-frame
    • 1.7% fail on Springs
      • 1.5% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (91% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.069% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.069% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.069% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.069% fail on Mounting
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension arms (65% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (55% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint dust cover (75% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes (69% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.90% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.21% fail on Other suspension component (76% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.069% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.14% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.069% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.069% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.14% fail on Anti-roll bars (95% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.069% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.069% fail on Linkage
  • 12% fail on Brakes (27% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 7.1% fail on Brake performance (33% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.069% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.069% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.069% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.069% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (49% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (51% better than other 1999 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (57% better than other 1999 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (59% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (68% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (72% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.69% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.069% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.069% fail on Rbt
          • 0.069% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 5.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (51% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.69% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.069% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.48% fail on Brake linings and pads (63% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on Brake pads (63% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.21% fail on Cable
    • 0.69% fail on Load sensing valves (61% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.21% fail on Valves
      • 0.14% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.069% fail on Servos
      • 0.069% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.41% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal
      • 0.21% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.21% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.14% fail on Other braking system component
        • 0.069% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.14% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.069% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.069% fail on Lever
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure (25% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Chassis
      • 3.9% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.069% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.069% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.76% fail on Transmission (81% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Drive shafts (75% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Joints (77% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.069% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.62% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.28% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.14% fail on Pipe
      • 0.14% fail on System
      • 0.069% fail on Tank
    • 0.28% fail on Cabs
      • 0.28% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.21% fail on Towbar
      • 0.14% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.069% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.21% fail on Body (80% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Panel
    • 0.21% fail on Seats
      • 0.14% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.069% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.069% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.069% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.069% fail on Doors
      • 0.069% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.069% fail on Door condition
  • 9.3% fail on Visibility
    • 5.5% fail on Washers
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.21% fail on View to rear
      • 0.21% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.14% fail on Driver's view
  • 3.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
      • 0.069% fail on Requirements
  • 2.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (47% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (40% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Compression ignition (54% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.35% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.069% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.069% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.069% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 1.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.90% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.28% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.14% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.21% fail on Fluid leaks (80% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.069% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.069% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.069% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.3% fail on Tyres (48% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.69% fail on Tread depth (72% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.069% fail on Size/type
  • 1.2% fail on Steering (79% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.55% fail on Steering linkage components (83% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Track rod end (86% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.35% fail on Steering gear (80% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Steering rack (88% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
    • 0.35% fail on Power steering
      • 0.28% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.069% fail on Operation
      • 0.069% fail on Other components
  • 0.069% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.069% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.069% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.069% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.069% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.069% fail on Condition