Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Peugeot Boxer MOT Results

Registered in 1999
60.0% pass rate
from 1,292 tests in 2017
(17% better than other 1999 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Boxer is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (37% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Position lamps (33% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Front lamps (46% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.077% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.0% fail on Horn (61% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.77% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.54% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (61% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (54% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp (53% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (59% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Fog lamp (60% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.077% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.077% fail on Switch
    • 1.0% fail on Battery (60% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.93% fail on Headlamps (78% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Headlamp (78% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.31% fail on Lamp
      • 0.31% fail on Switch
    • 0.31% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.15% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 16% fail on Suspension (30% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 11% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.8% fail on Component mounting
      • 3.8% fail on Subframe mounting (100% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Spring mounting
    • 3.2% fail on Wheel bearings (55% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Front
      • 1.4% fail on Rear (140% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts (63% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Front drive shafts (64% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (64% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.077% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.077% fail on Drive shafts
    • 1.0% fail on Suspension arms (72% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (70% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.62% fail on Front suspension joints (73% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Anti-roll bars (90% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (77% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.077% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.23% fail on Leaf springs (78% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.077% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.077% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.077% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 0.15% fail on Axles
      • 0.15% fail on Clearance (17 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.077% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.077% fail on Attachment
    • 0.077% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 13% fail on Brakes (34% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 7.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.5% fail on Components
        • 6.3% fail on Pipes (33% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Hoses (56% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.46% fail on Valves (81% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.46% fail on Leaks
      • 0.077% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.077% fail on Operation
    • 6.6% fail on Brake performance (46% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Front wheels (39% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Rear wheels (61% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance (66% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.85% fail on Service brake performance (72% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.23% fail on Brake operation
    • 0.62% fail on Hub components (73% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Brake pads (73% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.39% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.31% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
      • 0.077% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.31% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.23% fail on Parking brake (75% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Condition (75% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.15% fail on Pedal
        • 0.15% fail on Condition
    • 0.077% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.077% fail on Cable
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.7% fail on Wipers
    • 6.7% fail on Washers (42% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.077% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (27% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 3.6% fail on Chassis
    • 2.7% fail on Body condition (38% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.077% fail on Doors
      • 0.077% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.077% fail on Seats
      • 0.077% fail on Passengers
    • 0.077% fail on Spare wheel
  • 5.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (40% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust system (30% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.70% fail on Emissions (59% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.62% fail on Fuel system (58% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Cap
      • 0.077% fail on Hose
      • 0.077% fail on Pipe
    • 0.46% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres (31% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth (71% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
    • 0.15% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
      • 0.077% fail on Requirements
  • 1.6% fail on Steering (75% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Steering system (82% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Track rod end (85% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Steering rack (80% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.077% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.077% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.54% fail on Power steering
      • 0.46% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
    • 0.077% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.39% fail on Towbars
    • 0.31% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.077% fail on Towbar
  • 0.31% fail on Registration plates and VIN (77% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Registration plate (77% better than other 1999 vans)