MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Boxer » 2005

Peugeot Boxer MOT Results

Registered in 2005
64.1% pass rate
from 2,975 tests in 2021
(26% better than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Boxer is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (34% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp (29% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.17% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (87% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (39% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (33% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps (50% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp (57% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.034% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment (36% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Horn (52% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.27% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.034% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (74% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.40% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.13% fail on Outline marker lamps (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Outline marker lamp (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.067% fail on Rear reflectors (86% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.034% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.034% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 12% fail on Suspension (40% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (35% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Sub-frames (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Sub-frame
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.6% fail on Springs (58% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (96% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Leaf springs (48% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
        • 0.10% fail on Leaf spring (80% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.067% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.067% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.034% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.034% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.034% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms (78% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Ball joint (82% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint dust cover (67% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Pins and bushes (79% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.77% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.47% fail on Anti-roll bars (92% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (72% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage (74% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.067% fail on Linkage ball joints (96% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.067% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.034% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.37% fail on Other suspension component (52% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint (73% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.034% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.34% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.067% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.034% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.034% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.034% fail on Axles
      • 0.034% fail on Axle
    • 0.034% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.034% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.034% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.034% fail on Bellows
  • 12% fail on Brakes (34% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 8.1% fail on Brake performance (24% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt
          • 4.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.17% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.034% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.034% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.034% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance (57% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.034% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (62% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (62% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.067% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.61% fail on Parking brake performance (74% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.61% fail on Rbt (73% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.47% fail on Parking brake performance (77% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.067% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.067% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.37% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Load sensing valves (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (40% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.91% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.81% fail on Brake linings and pads (52% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.77% fail on Brake pads (53% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.034% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.34% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.27% fail on Cable
        • 0.034% fail on Lever
        • 0.034% fail on Pivot
    • 0.94% fail on Rigid brake pipes (81% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.54% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (190% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Prescribed areas (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Other braking system component (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.034% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
      • 0.067% fail on Other components
      • 0.034% fail on Additional braking device
    • 0.50% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.50% fail on Lever
    • 0.30% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.17% fail on Pedal
      • 0.13% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.10% fail on Valves
      • 0.034% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.034% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.17% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (92% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Anti-lock braking system (92% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.067% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.034% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure (22% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure (50% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (48% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Strengthening plate (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.034% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 2.9% fail on Chassis (38% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Chassis condition (37% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 2.6% fail on Transmission (43% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Drive shafts (34% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Joints (34% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.034% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.13% fail on Prop shafts (84% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Joints
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust system (41% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Seats
      • 0.27% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.17% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.37% fail on Cabs
      • 0.34% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.034% fail on Steps
    • 0.27% fail on Body (67% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Other body component (69% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.067% fail on Body condition
      • 0.067% fail on Panel
    • 0.13% fail on Fuel system (81% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Tank
      • 0.034% fail on Hose
      • 0.034% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.034% fail on System
    • 0.10% fail on Floor
    • 0.067% fail on Bumpers (81% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.067% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.034% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.034% fail on Carrier
    • 0.067% fail on Doors (91% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.067% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.067% fail on Door condition
    • 0.034% fail on Towbar
      • 0.034% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.034% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.034% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.034% fail on Undertray
  • 7.4% fail on Visibility (27% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Washers (42% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on View to rear (81% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors (80% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.034% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.034% fail on Window
  • 2.1% fail on Tyres (66% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (52% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.81% fail on Tread depth (77% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 1.7% fail on Steering (73% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Steering linkage components (85% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Track rod end (86% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.64% fail on Power steering
      • 0.47% fail on Pipes and hoses (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.067% fail on Pump
      • 0.034% fail on Other components
    • 0.37% fail on Steering gear (68% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Steering rack (69% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Operation
    • 0.034% fail on Steering play
      • 0.034% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (65% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts (43% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.17% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.034% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (68% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (71% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Compression ignition (67% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.40% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (77% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.37% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.20% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.034% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.034% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.13% fail on Spark ignition (81% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.067% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.067% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (85% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Fluid leaks (56% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Engine oil leaks (57% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.067% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.034% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.034% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.034% fail on Undertray
  • 0.40% fail on Identification of the vehicle (51% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Registration plates (50% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 0.13% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.10% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.034% fail on Speed limiter
      • 0.034% fail on Speed limiter plate
  • 0.067% fail on Road Wheels (83% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.067% fail on Attachment (80% better than other 2005 vans)