Peugeot Boxer MOT Results
Registered in 200561.3% pass rate
from 3,195 tests in 2017
(22% better than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Boxer is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(32% better than other 2005 vans)
- 5.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (50% better than other 2005 vans)
- 5.2% fail on Stop lamp (27% better than other 2005 vans)
-
4.9% fail on
Position lamps
(42% better than other 2005 vans)
- 3.7% fail on Rear lamps (33% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Front lamps (76% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.063% fail on All position lamps
-
3.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.2% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.50% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.19% fail on Side repeaters (80% better than other 2005 vans)
-
3.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (43% better than other 2005 vans)
-
2.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.6% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.063% fail on Switch
- 0.031% fail on Tell tale
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamps
(35% better than other 2005 vans)
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp (35% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.031% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.031% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.031% fail on Matched pair
- 0.69% fail on Battery (44% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.63% fail on Horn (64% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.16% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.031% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.031% fail on Lamp
-
16% fail on
Suspension
(29% better than other 2005 vans)
-
8.6% fail on
Prescribed areas
(70% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 4.3% fail on Spring mounting (67% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 3.7% fail on Component mounting (37% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Subframe mounting (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
4.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(24% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
4.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
(27% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 4.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (27% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.031% fail on Couplings
-
0.031% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.031% fail on Drive shafts
-
4.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
(27% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
3.0% fail on
Wheel bearings
(34% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 2.9% fail on Front (61% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Rear (73% better than other 2005 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.5% fail on Condition
-
2.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(50% better than other 2005 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (51% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
-
1.2% fail on
Leaf springs
-
0.78% fail on
Pins and bushes
(120% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.66% fail on Shackle (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Anchor (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Condition
- 0.16% fail on Anchor bracket (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.031% fail on Shackle bracket
-
0.78% fail on
Pins and bushes
(120% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints (54% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.56% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(91% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.44% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (89% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.063% fail on Linkage condition (87% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.031% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.031% fail on Attachment
-
0.19% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.19% fail on Condition
-
0.031% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.031% fail on Condition
-
0.031% fail on
Air suspension
- 0.031% fail on Accumulator
-
0.031% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.031% fail on Condition
-
0.031% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.031% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.031% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.031% fail on Attachment
-
8.6% fail on
Prescribed areas
(70% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
15% fail on
Brakes
(19% better than other 2005 vans)
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.3% fail on Rear wheels
- 4.1% fail on Front wheels (42% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance (44% better than other 2005 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Service brake performance (71% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.094% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.063% fail on Brake operation
-
4.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(43% better than other 2005 vans)
-
4.1% fail on
Components
(41% better than other 2005 vans)
- 2.4% fail on Valves (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Pipes (81% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.85% fail on Hoses
- 0.13% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.031% fail on Servos
- 0.094% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.094% fail on Leaks (75% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.063% fail on Operation
-
4.1% fail on
Components
(41% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Hub components
(59% better than other 2005 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads (50% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Brake discs (74% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.031% fail on Brake calipers
-
1.0% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.0% fail on Condition
- 0.50% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.41% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.41% fail on
Pedal
- 0.38% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.031% fail on Condition
-
0.41% fail on
Pedal
-
0.31% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.22% fail on Cable
- 0.031% fail on Brake slack adjuster
- 0.031% fail on Linkage
- 0.031% fail on Relay lever
-
0.28% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.19% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.094% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.25% fail on ABS (83% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.094% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.063% fail on
Components
- 0.031% fail on Servos
- 0.031% fail on Valves
- 0.031% fail on Leaks
-
0.063% fail on
Components
- 0.031% fail on Additional braking devices
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.8% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(22% better than other 2005 vans)
- 6.3% fail on Wipers
- 2.4% fail on Washers (43% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.66% fail on Mirrors
- 0.28% fail on Windscreen (74% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.063% fail on Bonnet
-
4.8% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.4% fail on Body condition
-
1.8% fail on
Vehicle structure
(45% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Chassis (45% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.28% fail on
Doors
(66% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.094% fail on Emergency exits
- 0.094% fail on Drivers
- 0.063% fail on Passengers front
- 0.031% fail on Passengers other
-
0.25% fail on
Seats
- 0.19% fail on Drivers
- 0.063% fail on Passengers
- 0.13% fail on Spare wheel
- 0.063% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.063% fail on
Steps and stairs
(5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.063% fail on Retractable steps (26 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.063% fail on Body security
-
0.063% fail on
Load security
- 0.063% fail on Loading door
-
4.1% fail on
Tyres
(50% better than other 2005 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Condition (34% better than other 2005 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Tread depth (60% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.063% fail on Size/type (81% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.063% fail on Valve stem
-
3.1% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(47% better than other 2005 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Exhaust system (40% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.69% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.31% fail on System
- 0.19% fail on Cap
- 0.094% fail on Tank
- 0.063% fail on Hose
- 0.031% fail on Pipe
- 0.25% fail on Emissions (80% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.063% fail on Emissions not tested (87% better than other 2005 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Steering
(68% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Steering system
(77% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.91% fail on Track rod end (76% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Steering rack (70% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.094% fail on Ball joint (79% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.031% fail on Drag link end
- 0.031% fail on Steering arm
- 0.38% fail on Steering operation (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.34% fail on
Power steering
(55% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Operation
- 0.16% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.063% fail on
Steering control
- 0.031% fail on Steering column
-
0.031% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.031% fail on Universal joint
- 0.063% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.3% fail on
Steering system
(77% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(72% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
(57% better than other 2005 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Prescribed areas (53% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.031% fail on Requirements
- 0.031% fail on Attachment
-
0.031% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.031% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
(57% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.56% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(49% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.56% fail on Registration plate (49% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.16% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.16% fail on Attachment
-
0.063% fail on
Towbars
- 0.063% fail on Vehicle structure