MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Boxer » 2005
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Peugeot Boxer MOT Results

Registered in 2005
63.8% pass rate
from 3,355 tests in 2020
(28% better than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Boxer is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (32% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Stop lamp (26% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.33% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.060% fail on Side repeaters (94% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (32% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (27% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (82% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.030% fail on Switch
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps (54% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp (62% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.9% fail on Position lamps (53% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Position lamp (52% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (62% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment (29% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Horn (50% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.27% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.030% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.89% fail on Outline marker lamps (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Outline marker lamp (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on All outline marker lamps
    • 0.060% fail on Rear reflectors (85% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.030% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.030% fail on Switch
    • 0.030% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.030% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 15% fail on Suspension (31% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 8.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (64% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms (63% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (73% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Pins and bushes (41% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint dust cover (57% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.030% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.4% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame
    • 2.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.7% fail on Springs (55% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (90% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.27% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
        • 0.18% fail on Leaf spring (64% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.089% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.060% fail on Shackle bracket
        • 0.030% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.030% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.030% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.66% fail on Anti-roll bars (90% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.089% fail on Pins and bushes (92% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.089% fail on Linkage (79% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Other suspension component (55% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint (67% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.089% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.060% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.030% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.030% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.21% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.030% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.030% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.030% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.030% fail on Suspension rod
  • 13% fail on Brakes (28% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 9.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance (24% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt (24% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 4.0% fail on Service brake performance (28% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.089% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.060% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.030% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (44% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (44% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance (49% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.030% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (44% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (45% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.089% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance (58% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (58% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.66% fail on Parking brake performance (69% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.27% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.089% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.030% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.030% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Load sensing valves (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (57% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Brake linings and pads (65% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Brake pads (66% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.030% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.57% fail on Brake discs and drums (56% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.57% fail on Brake discs (54% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.21% fail on Cable
        • 0.060% fail on Linkage
        • 0.060% fail on Pivot
        • 0.030% fail on Lever
    • 1.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (76% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.80% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.51% fail on Other braking system component (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.57% fail on Lever
    • 0.39% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.27% fail on Pedal
      • 0.12% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.39% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.27% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (85% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Anti-lock braking system (85% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.060% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.030% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.030% fail on Valves
    • 0.089% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.089% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.060% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.030% fail on Leaks
      • 0.030% fail on Servos
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure (21% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Transmission
      • 3.5% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.5% fail on Joints
        • 0.030% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.089% fail on Prop shafts (90% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.089% fail on Joints
      • 0.030% fail on Belts
    • 3.0% fail on Chassis (57% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Chassis condition (59% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure (49% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (44% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.089% fail on Sub-frame condition
        • 0.030% fail on Strengthening plate
      • 0.030% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust system (60% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.66% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.24% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.21% fail on System
      • 0.089% fail on Tank
      • 0.060% fail on Hose
      • 0.060% fail on Pipe
    • 0.30% fail on Body (66% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Other body component (68% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.089% fail on Panel
      • 0.060% fail on Body condition
      • 0.030% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.27% fail on Seats
      • 0.15% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.12% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.24% fail on Towbar
      • 0.21% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.030% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.21% fail on Doors (71% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.089% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.089% fail on Door condition
      • 0.060% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.060% fail on Door condition
      • 0.060% fail on Other passenger's door (79% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.030% fail on Door condition
        • 0.030% fail on Catch
    • 0.15% fail on Cabs
      • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.089% fail on Bumpers (80% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.060% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.060% fail on Carrier
    • 0.030% fail on Load security
      • 0.030% fail on Loading door
  • 7.2% fail on Visibility (29% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Washers (45% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on View to rear (64% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Mirrors (64% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.089% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.089% fail on Condition of glass (82% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.089% fail on Windscreen (82% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 2.2% fail on Tyres (68% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth (68% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Condition (68% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.089% fail on Size/type
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (64% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Seat belts (42% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (32% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.030% fail on Airbags
      • 0.030% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (74% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (76% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Compression ignition (77% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (84% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on Emissions not tested (63% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (67% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.030% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.030% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.030% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.24% fail on Spark ignition (69% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (61% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.030% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.030% fail on Catalytic converter
    • 0.27% fail on Fluid leaks (72% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Engine oil leaks (77% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.030% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.030% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.030% fail on Undertray
  • 1.4% fail on Steering (78% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.83% fail on Steering linkage components (82% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Track rod end (81% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Ball joint (82% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Power steering
      • 0.15% fail on Other components
      • 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.060% fail on Operation
    • 0.18% fail on Steering gear (82% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Steering rack (84% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Operation
    • 0.060% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.030% fail on Steering play
      • 0.030% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.21% fail on Identification of the vehicle (77% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Registration plates (76% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 0.12% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.089% fail on Steps and stairs (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Retractable steps (18 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Steps
    • 0.030% fail on Doors
      • 0.030% fail on Emergency exits
  • 0.089% fail on Road Wheels (75% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.089% fail on Attachment