Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Peugeot Expert MOT Results

Registered in 2005
49.4% pass rate
from 3,398 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Expert is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 9.1% fail on Headlamp aim (44% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 8.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Rear lamps (36% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.088% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.029% fail on Switch
    • 5.0% fail on Stop lamp (29% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Horn (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.059% fail on Switch
      • 0.029% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.029% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 4.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.3% fail on Side repeaters (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Individual lamps (54% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.59% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.18% fail on Tell tales (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Battery
    • 0.77% fail on Rear fog lamp (75% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Fog lamp (80% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.21% fail on Hazard warning (66% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Lamp
      • 0.059% fail on Switch (85% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.088% fail on Rear reflectors (79% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.088% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.029% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 25% fail on Suspension (9.5% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 9.1% fail on Drive shafts (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 9.0% fail on Front drive shafts (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 9.0% fail on Constant velocity joints (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Couplings
      • 0.12% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.12% fail on Drive shafts
    • 8.4% fail on Suspension arms (85% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 8.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (88% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Attachment
    • 4.1% fail on Front suspension joints (73% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.029% fail on Location
    • 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas (45% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Component mounting (36% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Subframe mounting (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.1% fail on Trailing arms (17 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (16 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment (36 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Sub-frames (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (15 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.97% fail on Shock absorbers (50% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Condition (50% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.74% fail on Wheel bearings (67% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Front (68% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Rear (69% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Anti-roll bars (95% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (96% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.088% fail on Presence (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Condition
      • 0.029% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.029% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.24% fail on Radius arms (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Axles
      • 0.12% fail on Swivel joints/housing (11 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Axle beam
    • 0.088% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.059% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.029% fail on Condition
    • 0.029% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.029% fail on Condition
    • 0.029% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 16% fail on Brakes (17% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 8.2% fail on Brake performance (23% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Front wheels (68% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Rear wheels (44% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Service brake performance (54% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.059% fail on Brake operation
    • 6.0% fail on Hydraulic systems (20% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Components (22% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Pipes (51% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Valves (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.74% fail on Hoses
        • 0.24% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.059% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.38% fail on Leaks
      • 0.26% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
    • 3.0% fail on Hub components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.53% fail on Brake discs (45% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.12% fail on Wheel cylinder
      • 0.029% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.0% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.0% fail on Pedal
        • 0.77% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.24% fail on Condition
    • 0.65% fail on ABS (57% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Parking brake (64% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Condition (64% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.35% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.32% fail on Cable
      • 0.029% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 0.088% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.059% fail on Components
        • 0.059% fail on Valves (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
    • 0.059% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.029% fail on Full power hydraulic systems
      • 0.029% fail on Warning
    • 0.029% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.029% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.029% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 9.7% fail on Driver's view of the road (14% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers (26% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.88% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.85% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.088% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (53% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Exhaust system (89% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.62% fail on System
      • 0.32% fail on Pipe
      • 0.12% fail on Cap
      • 0.059% fail on Tank
      • 0.059% fail on Hose
    • 0.79% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 7.9% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.79% fail on Size/type (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.029% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.3% fail on Steering (17% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Steering system (26% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Track rod end (26% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.18% fail on Free play
        • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.088% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.029% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.029% fail on Other components
        • 0.029% fail on Steering component
    • 1.1% fail on Power steering
      • 0.41% fail on Pipes and hoses (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Other components
      • 0.32% fail on Operation
      • 0.059% fail on Pump
      • 0.029% fail on Rams
    • 0.12% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.088% fail on Steering control
      • 0.059% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.029% fail on Steering column
    • 0.029% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.029% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 2.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.12% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts (36% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (45% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment
      • 0.088% fail on Requirements
      • 0.059% fail on Installation check (9 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Anchorage's
        • 0.029% fail on Belt(s)/padding
  • 3.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (26% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Body condition (41% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Doors (51% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Passengers other (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.029% fail on Drivers
    • 0.65% fail on Vehicle structure (48% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Chassis (48% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.18% fail on Seats
      • 0.15% fail on Drivers
      • 0.029% fail on Passengers
    • 0.18% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.088% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.059% fail on Load security
      • 0.029% fail on Bootlid
      • 0.029% fail on Loading door
    • 0.029% fail on Body security
  • 0.62% fail on Registration plates and VIN (44% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.59% fail on Registration plate (47% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.029% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment
    • 0.029% fail on Condition
  • 0.029% fail on Towbars
    • 0.029% fail on Vehicle structure