Peugeot Expert MOT Results

Registered in 2010
52.1% pass rate
from 2,785 tests in 2020
(13% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Expert is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (19% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.6% fail on Stop lamp (25% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 5.4% fail on Position lamps (53% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Position lamp (52% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps (38% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp (44% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.036% fail on Dipswitch
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.9% fail on Direction indicators (47% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Flashing type (47% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (88% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on Side repeaters (53% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.54% fail on Electrical equipment (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Horn
      • 0.072% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.036% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.32% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.32% fail on Switch
    • 0.18% fail on Reversing lamps (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Reversing lamps (76% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 14% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 13% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 13% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Drive shaft (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Flexible couplings (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Prop shafts (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.86% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.18% fail on Pipe
      • 0.14% fail on System
      • 0.036% fail on Tank
      • 0.036% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.36% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.29% fail on Doors
      • 0.14% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
      • 0.11% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
      • 0.036% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.036% fail on Catch
    • 0.25% fail on Engine mounting (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Engine mounting condition (200% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Bracket
    • 0.11% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.11% fail on Carrier
    • 0.072% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.072% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.072% fail on Body (83% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Other body component
    • 0.072% fail on Cabs
      • 0.072% fail on Steps (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.036% fail on Towbar
      • 0.036% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.036% fail on Load security
      • 0.036% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.036% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.036% fail on Seats
      • 0.036% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.036% fail on Undertray
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 7.0% fail on Suspension arms (60% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.9% fail on Ball joint (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Ball joint dust cover (95% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.072% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.072% fail on Pins and bushes (96% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.90% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.68% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage
      • 0.036% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.036% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.83% fail on Springs (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Coil springs (67% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.83% fail on Coil spring (66% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.036% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.50% fail on Wheel bearings (63% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Shock absorbers (64% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.072% fail on Suspension rod (12 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.14% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (17 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Suspension unit (26 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Operation
      • 0.036% fail on Bellows
    • 0.036% fail on Axles
      • 0.036% fail on Axle
    • 0.036% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.036% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.036% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.036% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 10% fail on Brakes (22% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.32% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.22% fail on Cable
        • 0.11% fail on Lever
    • 4.4% fail on Brake performance (32% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (48% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (47% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.072% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.072% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.83% fail on Parking brake performance (51% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.75% fail on Rbt (54% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.68% fail on Parking brake performance (53% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.072% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.072% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.072% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.72% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.72% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.47% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.072% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.43% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.43% fail on Lever
    • 0.43% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (51% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.036% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.36% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.072% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.036% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.11% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.036% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 10% fail on Visibility (26% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Washers (35% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers (26% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.68% fail on View to rear
      • 0.68% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.39% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.39% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.14% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.036% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.39% fail on Size/type
  • 4.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (31% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (37% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Compression ignition (35% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (37% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (46% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.036% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.036% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.57% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.54% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.036% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.79% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.75% fail on Engine oil leaks (86% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.036% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.036% fail on Undertray
  • 2.5% fail on Steering (47% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Steering linkage components (57% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end (67% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.072% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.072% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.036% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.39% fail on Power steering
      • 0.29% fail on Operation
      • 0.14% fail on Other components
    • 0.22% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.22% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.22% fail on Steering wheel (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.072% fail on Steering play
      • 0.072% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.036% fail on Steering column
    • 0.036% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (40% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.75% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.72% fail on Condition
      • 0.036% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.29% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (62% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.036% fail on Airbags
      • 0.036% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.32% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.32% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment
  • 0.036% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.036% fail on Belt(s)/padding