MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Expert » 2010

Peugeot Expert MOT Results

Registered in 2010
55.7% pass rate
from 2,509 tests in 2017
(12% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Expert is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (16% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 10% fail on Position lamps (45% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 9.6% fail on Front lamps (72% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Rear lamps (54% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.5% fail on Stop lamp (24% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.5% fail on Direction indicators (65% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Flashing type (65% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.7% fail on Individual lamps (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.32% fail on Side repeaters (60% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.080% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.080% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Dipswitch (26 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.5% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.040% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.24% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.20% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.16% fail on Switch
      • 0.040% fail on Lamp
      • 0.040% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.12% fail on Horn (82% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.080% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.080% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.040% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 19% fail on Suspension (41% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 12% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 12% fail on Front drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 12% fail on Constant velocity joints (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.040% fail on Couplings
      • 0.12% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.12% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.040% fail on Attachment
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms (56% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (57% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Attachment
    • 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints (81% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.72% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.60% fail on Front
      • 0.12% fail on Rear
    • 0.32% fail on Coil springs (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Shock absorbers (72% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Condition (72% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Air suspension (26 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Suspension unit (24 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Operation (44 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Bellows
    • 0.080% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.080% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.080% fail on Panhard rods (21 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.040% fail on Attachment
    • 0.080% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.080% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.040% fail on Axles
      • 0.040% fail on Axle beam
    • 0.040% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.040% fail on Component mounting
  • 9.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers (26% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Washers (35% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.56% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.36% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.5% fail on Brakes (28% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Hub components
      • 3.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.56% fail on Brake discs (48% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.040% fail on Brake linings
    • 2.8% fail on Brake performance (47% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear wheels (34% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.32% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.040% fail on Service brake performance
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake control components (84% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal (85% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Anti-slip (86% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 0.88% fail on Hydraulic systems (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Components (77% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.56% fail on Hoses
        • 0.040% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.16% fail on Operation
      • 0.080% fail on Leaks
      • 0.040% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 0.64% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.64% fail on Condition
    • 0.24% fail on ABS
    • 0.16% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.080% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.040% fail on Lever
      • 0.040% fail on Cable
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
    • 0.20% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (79% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust system (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.32% fail on System
      • 0.080% fail on Tank
      • 0.040% fail on Pipe
    • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.12% fail on Emissions
  • 2.4% fail on Steering (36% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Steering system (52% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Track rod end (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.32% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.080% fail on Free play
        • 0.080% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.080% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.48% fail on Power steering
      • 0.32% fail on Operation
      • 0.12% fail on Other components
      • 0.040% fail on Pump
      • 0.040% fail on Rams
    • 0.36% fail on Steering control (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Steering wheel (15 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Steering column
    • 0.040% fail on Steering operation
  • 1.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.92% fail on Condition (82% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Attachment
      • 0.040% fail on Requirements
      • 0.040% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.60% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.60% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.040% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.88% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.32% fail on Doors
      • 0.24% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.080% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.28% fail on Body condition
    • 0.12% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.080% fail on Body security
    • 0.040% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.040% fail on Seats
      • 0.040% fail on Drivers
  • 0.64% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.64% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.12% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.080% fail on Attachment
    • 0.040% fail on Condition