MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Expert » 2016

Peugeot Expert MOT Results

Registered in 2016
65.9% pass rate
from 4,641 tests in 2021
(29% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Expert is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (71% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamps (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Dipswitch
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim (66% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim (51% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp (76% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.90% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.60% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.065% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.90% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.90% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.90% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.26% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.24% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.022% fail on Switch
    • 0.13% fail on Hazard warning (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.065% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.043% fail on Horn
    • 0.065% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.022% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.022% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 8.0% fail on Visibility (50% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers (61% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Washers (63% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.43% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.30% fail on View to rear
      • 0.30% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.022% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Transmission (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 5.0% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 5.0% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.11% fail on Joints
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust system (7 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Seats (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Driver's seat (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.24% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Front passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.086% fail on Door condition
        • 0.043% fail on Catch (15 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.043% fail on Door condition
        • 0.022% fail on Catch
      • 0.043% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.022% fail on Door condition
        • 0.022% fail on Hinge
    • 0.15% fail on Engine mounting (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Engine mounting condition (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Bracket
    • 0.065% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.043% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.043% fail on Pipe
    • 0.043% fail on Body (87% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.043% fail on Other body component (83% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.022% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.022% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.022% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.022% fail on Carrier
    • 0.022% fail on Load security
      • 0.022% fail on Loading door
    • 0.022% fail on Floor
    • 0.022% fail on Cabs
      • 0.022% fail on Steps
  • 6.4% fail on Brakes
    • 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.84% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.84% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.17% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.11% fail on Lever
        • 0.065% fail on Cable
    • 2.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.86% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.86% fail on Rbt
          • 0.67% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.54% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.52% fail on Rbt
          • 0.52% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.022% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.022% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.43% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.065% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.90% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.34% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.30% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.13% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.17% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.17% fail on Lever
    • 0.065% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.065% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.065% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.043% fail on Rigid brake pipes (87% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.022% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.022% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
    • 0.022% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.022% fail on Brake fluid
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth (25% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Condition (24% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Size/type
  • 4.4% fail on Suspension
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms (81% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint (200% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint dust cover (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Pins and bushes (87% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.043% fail on Linkage
      • 0.022% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.022% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.32% fail on Springs (79% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Coil springs (76% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Coil spring (76% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.086% fail on Sub-frames (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.043% fail on Sub-frame (13 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.043% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (15 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.065% fail on Shock absorbers (85% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.065% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.065% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.022% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 2.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.99% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.62% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.022% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.022% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.022% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.32% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.32% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.11% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.086% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.022% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.65% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.34% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
      • 0.022% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment
      • 0.022% fail on Requirements
    • 0.30% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.022% fail on Airbags
      • 0.022% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.56% fail on Steering (45% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Power steering
      • 0.15% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
      • 0.043% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.022% fail on Pump
      • 0.022% fail on Rams
    • 0.19% fail on Steering linkage components (74% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Track rod end (73% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.043% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.022% fail on Operation
      • 0.022% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.022% fail on Steering play
      • 0.022% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.17% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.15% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.022% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.065% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.065% fail on Condition