Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Peugeot Partner MOT Results

Registered in 1997
46.3% pass rate
from 203 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Suspension (34% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 12% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 9.9% fail on Component mounting
      • 4.4% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.99% fail on Spring mounting
    • 7.4% fail on Suspension arms (150% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 7.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (160% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (150% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 4.9% fail on Coil springs (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.9% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.9% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.5% fail on Macpherson strut (8 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Condition (8 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Sub-frames (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.99% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.99% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.99% fail on Front
    • 0.99% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.49% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
  • 28% fail on Brakes
    • 18% fail on Hydraulic systems (92% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 18% fail on Components (110% worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 10% fail on Valves (4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 5.4% fail on Hoses
        • 4.9% fail on Pipes
      • 0.49% fail on Leaks
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.0% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.0% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.49% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.99% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (14 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
    • 0.49% fail on ABS
  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.9% fail on Stop lamp (94% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.49% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.9% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.49% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.5% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.49% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (79% better than other 1997 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.5% fail on Horn
    • 0.49% fail on Battery
    • 0.49% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.49% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.49% fail on Switch
    • 0.49% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 5.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Size/type
    • 0.99% fail on Valve stem (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
  • 9.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.9% fail on Wipers
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.99% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.49% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.49% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.4% fail on Steering
    • 6.4% fail on Steering system
      • 3.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 3.0% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.49% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.49% fail on Power steering
      • 0.49% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 7.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.99% fail on Pipe
      • 0.99% fail on System
    • 0.49% fail on Emissions
    • 0.49% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (65% better than other 1997 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Body condition
    • 0.99% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.99% fail on Chassis
  • 0.99% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.49% fail on Condition
    • 0.49% fail on Attachment
  • 0.99% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (85% better than other 1997 vans)
    • 0.99% fail on Seat belts (85% better than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.99% fail on Prescribed areas (82% better than other 1997 vans)