Peugeot Partner MOT Results

Registered in 1997
50.9% pass rate
from 53 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Suspension
    • 9.4% fail on Springs (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 9.4% fail on Coil springs (8 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 9.4% fail on Coil spring (8 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 7.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 5.7% fail on Linkage ball joints (42 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage
    • 7.5% fail on Sub-frames (6 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint
    • 5.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint
    • 5.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 7.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 7.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 7.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.9% fail on Switch
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.9% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 1.9% fail on Horn
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 3.8% fail on Chassis
      • 3.8% fail on Chassis condition
    • 3.8% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.9% fail on Pipe
      • 1.9% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.9% fail on Doors
      • 1.9% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 1.9% fail on Door condition
    • 1.9% fail on Seats
      • 1.9% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 7.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.7% fail on Rbt
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 5.7% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.9% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.9% fail on Pedal
    • 1.9% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
  • 9.4% fail on Steering
    • 3.8% fail on Steering gear
      • 3.8% fail on Steering rack
    • 3.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.8% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.9% fail on Steering play
      • 1.9% fail on Steering rack
  • 7.5% fail on Visibility
    • 5.7% fail on Washers
    • 1.9% fail on Wipers
  • 5.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.8% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.9% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition