Peugeot Partner MOT Results

Registered in 1997
49.6% pass rate
from 121 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Suspension (62% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 12% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 6.6% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Ball joint (190% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 9.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (160% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (6 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint (7 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (7 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.83% fail on Linkage
      • 0.83% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 9.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.8% fail on Springs
      • 5.8% fail on Coil springs (4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 5.8% fail on Coil spring (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes (84 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.83% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.5% fail on Macpherson strut (17 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (23 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Axles (6 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Axle (50 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 0.83% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint
  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (140% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 9.1% fail on Direction indicators (150% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 9.1% fail on Flashing type (150% worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 7.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.83% fail on Switch
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.5% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.83% fail on Horn
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 9.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 6.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 4.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 5.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.83% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.83% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.83% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.83% fail on Rbt
          • 0.83% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 7.4% fail on Load sensing valves (4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.7% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.83% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.83% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.83% fail on Brake discs
  • 11% fail on Steering (110% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 6.6% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.5% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.7% fail on Power steering
      • 0.83% fail on Operation
      • 0.83% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.83% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 8.3% fail on Visibility
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
  • 8.3% fail on Tyres
    • 5.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.83% fail on Size/type
  • 6.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (59% better than other 1997 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Chassis
      • 1.7% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.83% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.83% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.83% fail on Transmission
      • 0.83% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.83% fail on Joints
    • 0.83% fail on Doors
      • 0.83% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.83% fail on Hinge
  • 3.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.7% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.83% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.83% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.83% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.83% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (15 times worse than other 1997 vans)
  • 0.83% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.83% fail on Attachment