Peugeot Partner MOT Results
Registered in 199842.9% pass rate
from 406 tests in 2017
(17% worse than other 1998 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner is unusually good or bad.
-
30% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 11% fail on Stop lamp (110% worse than other 1998 vans)
-
9.4% fail on
Position lamps
- 7.1% fail on Front lamps (73% worse than other 1998 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Rear lamps
- 6.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
5.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
5.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.9% fail on Individual lamps
- 1.5% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.25% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.25% fail on Switch
-
5.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 5.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.7% fail on Battery
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(64% better than other 1998 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Fog lamp (63% better than other 1998 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamps
(67% better than other 1998 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp (66% better than other 1998 vans)
- 0.49% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.49% fail on Horn (84% better than other 1998 vans)
-
30% fail on
Suspension
(33% worse than other 1998 vans)
-
10% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 6.2% fail on Component mounting
- 4.2% fail on Subframe mounting (100% worse than other 1998 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Spring mounting
-
9.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(190% worse than other 1998 vans)
- 7.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.25% fail on Attachment
-
6.4% fail on
Coil springs
(3 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 6.2% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Location
-
6.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(92% worse than other 1998 vans)
- 6.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (110% worse than other 1998 vans)
-
3.9% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.4% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 3.4% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.49% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.49% fail on Drive shafts (5 times worse than other 1998 vans)
-
3.4% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
2.7% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 2.0% fail on Front
- 0.74% fail on Rear
- 2.2% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.74% fail on
Radius arms
(11 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 0.74% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (12 times worse than other 1998 vans)
-
0.74% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.74% fail on Condition
-
0.25% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.25% fail on Condition
-
0.25% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.25% fail on Attachment
-
10% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
24% fail on
Brakes
-
15% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(58% worse than other 1998 vans)
-
14% fail on
Components
(53% worse than other 1998 vans)
- 5.9% fail on Valves (200% worse than other 1998 vans)
- 5.2% fail on Pipes
- 4.2% fail on Hoses
- 0.25% fail on Cylinders
- 1.7% fail on Leaks
- 0.25% fail on Operation
-
14% fail on
Components
(53% worse than other 1998 vans)
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
- 7.4% fail on Front wheels
- 4.7% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.7% fail on Brake imbalance
- 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (71% better than other 1998 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.5% fail on
Hub components
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
- 0.99% fail on Brake pads
- 0.49% fail on Wheel cylinder (12 times worse than other 1998 vans)
-
0.99% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.99% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (8 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 0.74% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.25% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.25% fail on Condition
-
0.25% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.25% fail on
Pedal
- 0.25% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.25% fail on
Pedal
-
0.25% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.25% fail on Linkage
-
0.25% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.25% fail on Warning
-
15% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(58% worse than other 1998 vans)
-
11% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.4% fail on Wipers
- 3.4% fail on Washers
- 1.2% fail on Windscreen
- 0.25% fail on Mirrors
-
11% fail on
Tyres
(59% worse than other 1998 vans)
- 4.9% fail on Condition
- 4.9% fail on Tread depth
- 1.2% fail on Size/type
- 0.49% fail on Valve stem
-
8.4% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 5.9% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.5% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.2% fail on System
- 0.25% fail on Cap
- 0.99% fail on Emissions
- 0.49% fail on Emissions not tested
-
8.1% fail on
Steering
-
6.4% fail on
Steering system
- 4.9% fail on Track rod end (96% worse than other 1998 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Steering rack
- 0.25% fail on Ball joint
- 0.25% fail on Steering arm
-
1.2% fail on
Power steering
- 0.25% fail on Operation
- 0.25% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.25% fail on Pump
- 0.25% fail on Rams
- 0.25% fail on Other components
-
0.49% fail on
Steering control
- 0.25% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.25% fail on Steering column
- 0.49% fail on Steering operation
-
6.4% fail on
Steering system
-
6.4% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
3.0% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 3.0% fail on Chassis
- 3.0% fail on Body condition
-
0.74% fail on
Seats
- 0.74% fail on Passengers
-
0.25% fail on
Doors
- 0.25% fail on Passengers front
-
3.0% fail on
Vehicle structure
-
2.7% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
(71% better than other 1998 vans)
- 0.74% fail on Condition
- 0.74% fail on Prescribed areas (82% better than other 1998 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(6 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 0.99% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (6 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Drivers airbag
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
(71% better than other 1998 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.5% fail on Registration plate