Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Peugeot Partner MOT Results

Registered in 1998
46.1% pass rate
from 243 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Suspension (45% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 9.5% fail on Suspension arms (120% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.41% fail on Suspension arm
    • 9.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 8.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (180% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (11 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (16 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.9% fail on Springs
      • 2.9% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 2.9% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.6% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.41% fail on Sub-frame
    • 1.2% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.41% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.82% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (20 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 0.41% fail on Axles
      • 0.41% fail on Stub axle
  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (150% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.82% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.41% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.41% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.41% fail on Horn
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 9.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.8% fail on Rbt
          • 5.8% fail on Service brake performance
      • 5.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 4.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.41% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.6% fail on Load sensing valves (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.3% fail on Flexible brake hoses (3 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.82% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.82% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.82% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.82% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.82% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.82% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.41% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
        • 0.41% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.41% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.41% fail on Pedal
    • 0.41% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.41% fail on Valves
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.5% fail on Chassis
      • 4.1% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.41% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 3.7% fail on Transmission
      • 3.7% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.7% fail on Joints
    • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.41% fail on Pipe
      • 0.41% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.41% fail on System
    • 0.82% fail on Body
      • 0.82% fail on Panel
    • 0.82% fail on Seats
      • 0.82% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.41% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.41% fail on Doors
      • 0.41% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.41% fail on Door condition
  • 9.5% fail on Tyres (110% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Tread depth (160% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
  • 9.1% fail on Visibility
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.82% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.82% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.82% fail on View to rear
      • 0.41% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.41% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.41% fail on Driver's view
  • 8.6% fail on Steering
    • 6.6% fail on Steering linkage components (120% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Track rod end (130% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.41% fail on Drag link end
    • 2.1% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.6% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.41% fail on Operation
    • 0.82% fail on Power steering
      • 0.82% fail on Rams (24 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Operation
    • 0.82% fail on Steering column (11 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 0.41% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.41% fail on Steering play
      • 0.41% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.41% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 2.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.41% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.41% fail on Other leaks
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.82% fail on Seat belts (82% better than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
    • 0.82% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.82% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.82% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.41% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.41% fail on Attachment