Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Peugeot Partner MOT Results

Registered in 1999
42.6% pass rate
from 601 tests in 2017
(18% worse than other 1999 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Suspension (36% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 10% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 6.5% fail on Component mounting
      • 3.3% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 1.5% fail on Spring mounting (62% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 8.5% fail on Suspension arms (140% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 8.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (120% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.00% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.50% fail on Linkage condition
    • 4.8% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Wheel bearings (110% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Front (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Rear
    • 4.2% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.2% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.00% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.00% fail on Condition
    • 0.67% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.50% fail on Attachment (9 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
    • 0.50% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.50% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.50% fail on Condition
    • 0.50% fail on Axles
      • 0.33% fail on Swivel joints/housing (12 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Axle beam
    • 0.33% fail on Radius arms (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (8 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on General condition
    • 0.17% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment
    • 0.17% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (86% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 9.0% fail on Direction indicators (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 9.0% fail on Flashing type (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 5.7% fail on Individual lamps (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Side repeaters (190% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.33% fail on Switch
    • 8.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.5% fail on Rear lamps
    • 7.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps (50% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp (49% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Battery
    • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (58% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Fog lamp (57% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Horn
  • 25% fail on Brakes (25% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 15% fail on Hydraulic systems (57% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 14% fail on Components (62% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 9.2% fail on Valves (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 4.8% fail on Pipes
        • 3.7% fail on Hoses
      • 0.50% fail on Leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.3% fail on Front wheels (83% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance (62% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.00% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Hub components
      • 1.00% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.33% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.17% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (9 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.67% fail on Pedal
        • 0.50% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.17% fail on Condition
    • 0.67% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.50% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.50% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.17% fail on Components
        • 0.17% fail on Valves
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.3% fail on Wipers
    • 5.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.7% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.50% fail on Mirrors
  • 12% fail on Tyres (77% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Tread depth (89% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Condition (60% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.00% fail on Size/type
  • 10% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Emissions
    • 1.00% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.50% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.33% fail on System
      • 0.17% fail on Tank
  • 9.0% fail on Steering
    • 7.8% fail on Steering system
      • 5.8% fail on Track rod end (92% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.67% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.33% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.17% fail on Other components
        • 0.17% fail on Steering component
    • 0.67% fail on Power steering
      • 0.33% fail on Operation
      • 0.17% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.17% fail on Rams
    • 0.33% fail on Steering control
      • 0.17% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.17% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.17% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.33% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.17% fail on Steering operation
  • 5.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 4.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (43% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.8% fail on Chassis
    • 1.8% fail on Body condition (58% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Seats
      • 0.33% fail on Passengers
      • 0.33% fail on Drivers
    • 0.50% fail on Doors
      • 0.33% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.17% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.17% fail on Body security
    • 0.17% fail on Spare wheel
  • 0.67% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.67% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.33% fail on Towbars
    • 0.33% fail on Towbar
  • 0.17% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.17% fail on Attachment