Peugeot Partner MOT Results
Registered in 200345.5% pass rate
from 3,946 tests in 2017
(4.5% worse than other 2003 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner is unusually good or bad.
-
33% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 9.4% fail on Stop lamp (26% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
8.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.3% fail on Front lamps
- 2.3% fail on Rear lamps (24% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.076% fail on All position lamps
- 7.2% fail on Headlamp aim
-
6.2% fail on
Direction indicators
(47% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
6.2% fail on
Flashing type
(47% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 3.1% fail on Individual lamps
- 3.1% fail on Side repeaters (180% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.63% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.48% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.025% fail on Tell tales
-
0.025% fail on
Semaphore
- 0.025% fail on Switch
-
6.2% fail on
Flashing type
(47% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 4.8% fail on Horn (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamps
(39% better than other 2003 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp (43% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
0.076% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.076% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.025% fail on Matched pair
- 2.1% fail on Battery
-
0.89% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(75% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.84% fail on Fog lamp (76% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.025% fail on Tell tale
- 0.025% fail on Switch
- 0.10% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.10% fail on
Hazard warning
(87% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.076% fail on Switch (87% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.025% fail on Lamp
- 0.076% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.076% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
24% fail on
Suspension
-
7.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(31% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 6.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (62% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.28% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.076% fail on Attachment (75% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.025% fail on Condition
-
7.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(49% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 6.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (51% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
-
5.2% fail on
Coil springs
(78% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 5.1% fail on Condition (79% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Location
-
3.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(25% better than other 2003 vans)
-
3.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
(24% better than other 2003 vans)
- 3.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (25% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.051% fail on Couplings
- 0.025% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.051% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.051% fail on Drive shafts
-
3.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
(24% better than other 2003 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Front suspension joints
-
2.4% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.8% fail on Front
- 0.66% fail on Rear
-
0.89% fail on
Prescribed areas
(88% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.61% fail on Component mounting (86% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Subframe mounting (76% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.025% fail on Spring mounting
-
0.30% fail on
Shock absorbers
(84% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.30% fail on Condition (84% better than other 2003 vans)
-
0.23% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.025% fail on Condition
-
0.23% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.23% fail on Condition
-
0.20% fail on
Radius arms
(2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.025% fail on Condition
-
0.18% fail on
Axles
- 0.076% fail on Axle beam
- 0.051% fail on Clearance (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.025% fail on King pins
- 0.025% fail on Swivel joints/housing
-
0.15% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.076% fail on Attachment
- 0.051% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.025% fail on Condition
-
0.10% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.076% fail on General condition
-
0.076% fail on
Torsion bars
(8 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.051% fail on Condition (8 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.025% fail on Attachment
-
0.076% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.051% fail on Condition
- 0.025% fail on Attachment
-
0.051% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.051% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.025% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
7.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(31% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
18% fail on
Brakes
(18% better than other 2003 vans)
-
12% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(20% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
12% fail on
Components
(22% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 7.5% fail on Valves (160% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 4.8% fail on Pipes (24% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.84% fail on Hoses
- 0.13% fail on Cylinders
- 0.051% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.30% fail on Leaks
- 0.25% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.051% fail on Operation
-
12% fail on
Components
(22% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
6.8% fail on
Brake performance
(47% better than other 2003 vans)
- 3.0% fail on Front wheels (29% better than other 2003 vans)
- 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.6% fail on Rear wheels (56% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.81% fail on Parking brake performance (87% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.56% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.051% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.4% fail on
Hub components
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads (33% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
- 0.10% fail on Wheel cylinder
- 0.051% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.025% fail on Brake linings
- 0.025% fail on Brake drums
-
0.41% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.41% fail on
Pedal
- 0.28% fail on Anti-slip (54% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Condition
-
0.41% fail on
Pedal
-
0.23% fail on
Parking brake
(82% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Condition (82% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.15% fail on ABS (65% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.076% fail on
Mechanical components
(85% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.025% fail on Brake slack adjuster
- 0.025% fail on Linkage
- 0.025% fail on Cable
- 0.025% fail on Additional braking devices
-
0.025% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.025% fail on
Components
- 0.025% fail on Valves
-
0.025% fail on
Components
-
12% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(20% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
11% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.6% fail on Wipers (18% better than other 2003 vans)
- 5.5% fail on Washers
- 0.99% fail on Windscreen
- 0.35% fail on Mirrors (70% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.025% fail on Bonnet
-
11% fail on
Tyres
(27% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 6.6% fail on Tread depth (24% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 4.9% fail on Condition (38% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.33% fail on Size/type
- 0.23% fail on Valve stem
-
8.6% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(56% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
6.6% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 6.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Drivers airbag (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
2.4% fail on
Seat belts
(38% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (58% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Condition
- 0.23% fail on Requirements
- 0.076% fail on Attachment
-
0.025% fail on
Installation check
- 0.025% fail on Anchorage's
-
6.6% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
8.1% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(16% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 5.9% fail on Exhaust system (41% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Emissions
- 0.71% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.30% fail on
Fuel system
(76% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Cap (65% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.13% fail on System (74% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.025% fail on Hose
- 0.025% fail on Pipe
-
7.3% fail on
Steering
-
5.8% fail on
Steering system
- 4.0% fail on Track rod end
- 1.5% fail on Steering rack
- 0.43% fail on Ball joint
- 0.18% fail on Steering arm
-
0.10% fail on
Free play
- 0.10% fail on Steering rack
- 0.051% fail on Drag link end
-
0.051% fail on
Other components
- 0.051% fail on Steering pivot point
-
1.5% fail on
Power steering
(65% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.68% fail on Other components (160% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.56% fail on Pipes and hoses (95% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Operation
- 0.10% fail on Pump
- 0.051% fail on Rams
- 0.025% fail on Drive system
- 0.23% fail on Steering operation
-
0.076% fail on
Steering control
-
0.076% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.076% fail on Universal joint
-
0.076% fail on
Steering coupling
-
5.8% fail on
Steering system
-
3.9% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(44% better than other 2003 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Doors
(140% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Passengers other (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Drivers
- 0.10% fail on Passengers front
- 0.66% fail on Body condition (82% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.43% fail on Spare wheel (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
0.35% fail on
Seats
- 0.23% fail on Passengers
- 0.13% fail on Drivers
-
0.13% fail on
Vehicle structure
(94% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Chassis (94% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.051% fail on Body security
- 0.025% fail on Speedometer
-
2.5% fail on
Doors
(140% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate
-
0.33% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.20% fail on Attachment
- 0.13% fail on Condition
-
0.076% fail on
Towbars
(75% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.051% fail on Towbar
- 0.025% fail on Vehicle structure