MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Partner » 2006

Peugeot Partner MOT Results

Registered in 2006
50.9% pass rate
from 3,498 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.0% fail on Stop lamp (50% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Direction indicators (49% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Flashing type (49% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Individual direction indicators (58% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.80% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.40% fail on All direction indicators (110% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Switch
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.3% fail on Electrical equipment (100% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Horn (120% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Battery(ies) (140% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.029% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps (41% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp (39% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.086% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.029% fail on Dipswitch
    • 0.86% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (71% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Rear fog lamp (71% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.86% fail on Rear fog lamp (71% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.37% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.029% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.029% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 8.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (35% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (120% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Linkage ball joints (48% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (170% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.086% fail on Linkage (77% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 7.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.17% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.029% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.7% fail on Springs
      • 4.7% fail on Coil springs (100% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 4.7% fail on Coil spring (110% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.057% fail on Mounting
      • 0.057% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (90% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.029% fail on Leaf spring
    • 2.9% fail on Wheel bearings (38% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (71% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.23% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.029% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.34% fail on Axles (200% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Stub axle (9 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Axle
      • 0.029% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.31% fail on Shock absorbers (66% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Other suspension component (60% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint (63% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.029% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.029% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.20% fail on Sub-frames (63% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.057% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.029% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.086% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.029% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 14% fail on Brakes (24% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Brake performance (47% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (39% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (40% worse than other 2006 vans)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance (39% worse than other 2006 vans)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance (24% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (23% better than other 2006 vans)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance (28% better than other 2006 vans)
          • 0.74% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.057% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.057% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.057% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.94% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (85% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.94% fail on Rbt (sp) (85% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on Rbt (88% better than other 2006 vans)
          • 0.29% fail on Parking brake performance (87% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.5% fail on Load sensing valves (6 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (22% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (35% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.057% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.71% fail on Brake linings and pads (64% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Brake pads (64% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Brake linings
    • 0.94% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.80% fail on Pedal (78% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.43% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (79% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Anti-lock braking system (77% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.31% fail on Lever
      • 0.029% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.34% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.23% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.11% fail on Valves
      • 0.057% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.23% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.029% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.14% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.029% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.029% fail on Operation
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure (14% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Transmission
      • 4.5% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.5% fail on Joints
        • 0.057% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.086% fail on Prop shafts (90% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.086% fail on Joints (76% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust system (55% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.77% fail on Integral vehicle structure (67% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (68% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.029% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.77% fail on Doors
      • 0.60% fail on Other passenger's door (140% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.60% fail on Door condition (160% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
      • 0.057% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.029% fail on Door condition
        • 0.029% fail on Catch
    • 0.43% fail on Body
      • 0.31% fail on Other body component
      • 0.11% fail on Panel
    • 0.43% fail on Seats
      • 0.23% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.20% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.34% fail on Chassis (81% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Chassis condition (81% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.26% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.20% fail on Carrier
      • 0.086% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.20% fail on Fuel system (70% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.029% fail on Hose
    • 0.086% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.057% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.029% fail on Bracket
    • 0.029% fail on Passenger compartment
    • 0.029% fail on Undertray
  • 9.3% fail on Visibility
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers
    • 3.4% fail on Washers (26% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.63% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.26% fail on View to rear (65% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Mirrors (64% better than other 2006 vans)
  • 7.5% fail on Tyres (18% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.6% fail on Condition (30% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Size/type
  • 6.2% fail on Steering
    • 3.3% fail on Steering linkage components (28% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Track rod end (28% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.057% fail on Other components
        • 0.057% fail on Steering component (10 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.8% fail on Steering gear (80% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Steering rack (76% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Power steering (95% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Operation (130% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.31% fail on Other components
      • 0.086% fail on Rams
    • 0.29% fail on Steering play
      • 0.29% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.086% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.029% fail on Steering column
  • 4.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.83% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.69% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.49% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (190% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.057% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.029% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.029% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 0.80% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.49% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.20% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.029% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.029% fail on NOx sensor
    • 0.71% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.60% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.057% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.029% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.029% fail on Other leaks
  • 4.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (82% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts (46% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Prescribed areas (47% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Airbags
      • 0.086% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.029% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.43% fail on Identification of the vehicle (50% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Registration plates (53% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.029% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment
    • 0.086% fail on Condition