Peugeot Partner MOT Results
Registered in 200853.6% pass rate
from 3,997 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(8.4% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 9.3% fail on Stop lamp (50% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
4.4% fail on
Electrical equipment
(2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 3.6% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.85% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.050% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.025% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (32% better than other 2008 vans)
-
3.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.6% fail on Individual direction indicators (36% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.53% fail on Side repeaters (44% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.23% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp
- 0.025% fail on Dipswitch
-
1.2% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(56% better than other 2008 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(56% better than other 2008 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (56% better than other 2008 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(56% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.25% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.25% fail on Position lamp
-
0.075% fail on
Hazard warning
(80% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.075% fail on Switch (80% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.050% fail on Rear reflectors (88% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.050% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.050% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
6.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (40% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.98% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.60% fail on Ball joint
- 0.15% fail on Linkage (63% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (77% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.025% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes
-
5.4% fail on
Springs
(23% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
5.4% fail on
Coil springs
(130% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 5.3% fail on Coil spring (130% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.075% fail on Mounting
-
5.4% fail on
Coil springs
(130% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
5.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(22% better than other 2008 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Ball joint
- 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.10% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.025% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (63% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.55% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.55% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.28% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.13% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.025% fail on Ball joint
-
0.43% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.25% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.13% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.025% fail on Ball joint
-
0.33% fail on
Other suspension component
(56% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint (66% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.050% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.25% fail on
Axles
(2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Axle (7 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 0.025% fail on Stub axle
-
0.050% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.025% fail on Ball joint
- 0.025% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
6.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
11% fail on
Brakes
(36% better than other 2008 vans)
-
4.4% fail on
Brake performance
(57% better than other 2008 vans)
-
2.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
- 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.68% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.050% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (9 times worse than other 2008 vans)
-
0.050% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.025% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.025% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
-
1.9% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (49% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.78% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.78% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(89% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.78% fail on Rbt (sp) (89% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.40% fail on
Parking brake performance
(85% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.38% fail on
Rbt
(86% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance (85% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.025% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.025% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.025% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.38% fail on
Rbt
(86% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Brake performance not tested (70% better than other 2008 vans)
-
2.4% fail on
Service brake performance
- 2.7% fail on Load sensing valves (10 times worse than other 2008 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(41% better than other 2008 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(47% better than other 2008 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads (47% better than other 2008 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
-
0.23% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(59% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Cable
- 0.025% fail on Lever
- 0.025% fail on Clevis joint
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(47% better than other 2008 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (69% better than other 2008 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(36% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.98% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.025% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.83% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.73% fail on Pedal (63% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Hand lever
-
0.48% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Brake fluid (160% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Reservoirs (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.075% fail on Valves
-
0.30% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.25% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.025% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.025% fail on Air brake cylinder/actuator
- 0.28% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.15% fail on
Parking brake control
(76% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Lever (76% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.025% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.025% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.025% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
0.025% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
4.4% fail on
Brake performance
(57% better than other 2008 vans)
-
11% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
7.0% fail on
Transmission
(75% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
6.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(100% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 6.7% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.050% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.18% fail on
Prop shafts
(75% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Joints
- 0.025% fail on Belts
-
6.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(100% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.48% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.33% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.10% fail on Pipe
- 0.050% fail on Tank
-
0.38% fail on
Seats
- 0.20% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.20% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.35% fail on
Doors
-
0.25% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.20% fail on Door condition
- 0.025% fail on Catch
- 0.025% fail on Hinge
-
0.075% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.075% fail on Door condition
-
0.025% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.025% fail on Door condition
-
0.25% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.28% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(82% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.28% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (82% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.28% fail on
Chassis
(73% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Chassis condition (75% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.025% fail on Strengthening plate
-
0.25% fail on
Body
(58% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Other body component
- 0.10% fail on Panel
-
0.20% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.15% fail on Carrier
- 0.050% fail on Spare wheel condition
- 0.10% fail on Bumpers
-
0.075% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.050% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.025% fail on Bracket
-
0.025% fail on
Load security
- 0.025% fail on Loading door
- 0.025% fail on Floor
- 0.025% fail on Passenger compartment
-
7.0% fail on
Transmission
(75% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
8.8% fail on
Visibility
- 4.3% fail on Wipers
- 3.9% fail on Washers
-
0.60% fail on
View to rear
- 0.60% fail on Mirrors
-
0.50% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.50% fail on Windscreen
- 0.050% fail on Driver's view
- 0.050% fail on Bonnet
-
7.5% fail on
Steering
(26% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
4.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.7% fail on Track rod end
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint
- 0.050% fail on Drag link end
- 0.025% fail on Steering arm
-
0.025% fail on
Other components
- 0.025% fail on Steering component
-
2.9% fail on
Steering gear
(2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.025% fail on Steering box
-
0.93% fail on
Power steering
(60% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.50% fail on Other components (160% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Operation
- 0.20% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.025% fail on Pump
-
0.20% fail on
Steering play
- 0.20% fail on Steering rack
- 0.18% fail on Steering wheel (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
-
4.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
7.0% fail on
Tyres
- 4.1% fail on Tread depth
- 3.0% fail on Condition
- 0.30% fail on Size/type
-
6.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.7% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.8% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (72% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (53% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (57% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.53% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.18% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.075% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
1.7% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.93% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.63% fail on Catalyst emissions (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested (190% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.025% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
4.7% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.68% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.60% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.075% fail on Other leaks
-
0.050% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.050% fail on Undertray (8 times worse than other 2008 vans)
-
6.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (49% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.83% fail on Condition
- 0.63% fail on Prescribed areas (54% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Attachment
- 0.075% fail on Requirements
- 0.050% fail on Pre-tensioners (10 times worse than other 2008 vans)
-
0.075% fail on
Airbags
- 0.050% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.025% fail on Passengers airbag
-
0.53% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.53% fail on Registration plates
-
0.28% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.18% fail on Attachment
- 0.10% fail on Condition
-
0.025% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.025% fail on Belt(s)/padding