Peugeot Partner MOT Results
Registered in 200953.8% pass rate
from 4,978 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(13% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 9.4% fail on Stop lamp (53% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 5.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
3.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.40% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp
- 0.060% fail on Dipswitch
- 0.020% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (33% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.46% fail on Side repeaters (45% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.6% fail on
Electrical equipment
(150% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.080% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.020% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
1.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(59% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(59% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.98% fail on Rear fog lamp (60% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.020% fail on Switch
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(59% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.36% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.36% fail on Switch
-
0.28% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.28% fail on Position lamp
-
0.14% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.12% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.020% fail on Reversing lamp switch
- 0.040% fail on Rear reflectors (90% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.020% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.020% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
16% fail on
Suspension
(13% better than other 2009 vans)
-
6.5% fail on
Springs
(32% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
6.4% fail on
Coil springs
(130% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 6.4% fail on Coil spring (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.080% fail on Mounting
-
0.020% fail on
Bonded suspension units
- 0.020% fail on Bonded suspension unit
- 0.020% fail on Attachment bracket
-
6.4% fail on
Coil springs
(130% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
4.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(26% better than other 2009 vans)
- 2.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.96% fail on Ball joint (56% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.92% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (36% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.42% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.10% fail on Linkage (70% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.060% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (89% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.040% fail on Anti-roll bar
-
4.5% fail on
Suspension arms
(26% better than other 2009 vans)
- 2.6% fail on Ball joint
- 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes (32% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.90% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.020% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.88% fail on Wheel bearings (45% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.58% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.52% fail on Ball joint
- 0.040% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.020% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.020% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.50% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.080% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.020% fail on Ball joint
- 0.48% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (73% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Shock absorbers (51% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.14% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.060% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.040% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.020% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.020% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.060% fail on
Axles
- 0.040% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 0.020% fail on Axle
-
6.5% fail on
Springs
(32% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
11% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(14% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
7.5% fail on
Transmission
(80% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
7.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(100% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 7.2% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.020% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.26% fail on
Prop shafts
(58% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Joints
-
7.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(100% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.76% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.50% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Hose
- 0.080% fail on Pipe
- 0.040% fail on Tank
- 0.040% fail on System
-
0.32% fail on
Body
- 0.22% fail on Other body component
- 0.10% fail on Panel
-
0.26% fail on
Seats
- 0.22% fail on Passenger's seat (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.040% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.24% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(77% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (77% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.22% fail on
Doors
(61% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.14% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.14% fail on Door condition
-
0.060% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.040% fail on Door condition
- 0.020% fail on Catch
-
0.040% fail on
Front passenger's door
(83% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.040% fail on Door condition (82% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.14% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.18% fail on
Spare wheel
(140% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Carrier
- 0.080% fail on Spare wheel condition
- 0.10% fail on Undertray (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.060% fail on
Chassis
(91% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.060% fail on Chassis condition (91% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.060% fail on Bumpers
-
0.060% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.040% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.020% fail on Bracket
- 0.060% fail on Floor
-
0.020% fail on
Towbar
- 0.020% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.020% fail on
Load security
- 0.020% fail on Loading door
-
0.020% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.020% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.020% fail on
Cabs
- 0.020% fail on Prescribed areas
-
7.5% fail on
Transmission
(80% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
10% fail on
Brakes
(34% better than other 2009 vans)
-
3.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.3% fail on Brake pads
-
1.4% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.4% fail on Brake discs
-
0.46% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.44% fail on Cable
- 0.020% fail on Lever
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
3.5% fail on
Brake performance
(59% better than other 2009 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
- 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.42% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.020% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.020% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
-
0.72% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(87% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.72% fail on Rbt (sp) (87% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.50% fail on
Parking brake performance
(77% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.48% fail on
Rbt
(77% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.46% fail on Parking brake performance (75% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.020% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.020% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.020% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.48% fail on
Rbt
(77% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.48% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(59% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.48% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(58% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.30% fail on Service brake imbalance (48% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Service brake performance (68% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.48% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(58% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Brake performance not tested (69% better than other 2009 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.020% fail on Electronic braking system
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(91% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Pedal (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Hand lever
- 0.90% fail on Load sensing valves (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.50% fail on Rigid brake pipes (86% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.28% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.18% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.060% fail on Valves (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.020% fail on Master cylinder
- 0.020% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.26% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.060% fail on
Parking brake control
(89% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.060% fail on Lever (89% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.060% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.040% fail on Other components
-
0.020% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.020% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
0.040% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(80% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.040% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.020% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.020% fail on Operation
-
3.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
8.0% fail on
Visibility
- 4.3% fail on Washers
- 3.5% fail on Wipers
-
0.44% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.42% fail on Windscreen
- 0.020% fail on Window
-
0.30% fail on
View to rear
(57% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.28% fail on Mirrors (59% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.020% fail on Indirect vision devices
- 0.12% fail on Bonnet
- 0.040% fail on Driver's view
-
7.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.5% fail on
Compression ignition
- 3.8% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (77% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (50% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.080% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.080% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.020% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
1.3% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.94% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.24% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.20% fail on Emissions not tested (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
5.5% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.80% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.74% fail on Engine oil leaks (62% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.040% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.020% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
0.060% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.040% fail on Undertray
- 0.020% fail on Sound deadening material
-
6.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.2% fail on
Tyres
(14% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 4.9% fail on Tread depth (28% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 2.6% fail on Condition
- 0.18% fail on Size/type
-
4.6% fail on
Steering
-
3.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.4% fail on Track rod end
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint
- 0.020% fail on Drag link end
- 0.020% fail on Locking devices
-
0.88% fail on
Steering gear
(60% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.76% fail on Steering rack
- 0.14% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.20% fail on
Power steering
(55% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.080% fail on Other components
- 0.020% fail on Rams
- 0.14% fail on Steering wheel (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.060% fail on Steering column
-
0.020% fail on
Steering play
- 0.020% fail on Steering rack
-
3.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(24% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
(33% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.90% fail on Condition
- 0.32% fail on Prescribed areas (70% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Requirements
- 0.020% fail on Attachment
- 0.90% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.020% fail on
Airbags
- 0.020% fail on Drivers airbag
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
(33% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.34% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(53% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Registration plates (52% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.24% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.16% fail on Attachment
- 0.080% fail on Condition