MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Partner » 2010

Peugeot Partner MOT Results

Registered in 2010
54.0% pass rate
from 6,382 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (11% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 8.5% fail on Stop lamp (49% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (18% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.52% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.3% fail on Electrical equipment (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.063% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.031% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators (34% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type (34% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.33% fail on Side repeaters (62% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.063% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.89% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (60% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Rear fog lamp (60% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.89% fail on Rear fog lamp (60% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.38% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.30% fail on Switch
    • 0.24% fail on Reversing lamps (66% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Reversing lamps (65% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.078% fail on Rear reflectors (75% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.047% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.047% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 15% fail on Suspension (11% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.1% fail on Springs (47% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.1% fail on Coil springs (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 7.1% fail on Coil spring (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.063% fail on Mounting
    • 4.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (31% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.58% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (52% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint dust cover (42% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (75% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.016% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.016% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.9% fail on Suspension arms (32% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes (34% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint dust cover (65% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.77% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.64% fail on Ball joint (71% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.031% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.016% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.42% fail on Wheel bearings (75% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.094% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.016% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.27% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (78% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Shock absorbers (77% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.047% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.031% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.016% fail on Suspension rod
    • 0.031% fail on Axles
      • 0.016% fail on Axle
      • 0.016% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.016% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint
  • 9.6% fail on Brakes (35% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.9% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.016% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.016% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.25% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.22% fail on Cable
        • 0.016% fail on Lever
        • 0.016% fail on Linkage
    • 3.2% fail on Brake performance (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (27% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (26% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake imbalance (53% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.016% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.016% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.016% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.96% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (82% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.96% fail on Rbt (sp) (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Parking brake performance (65% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.66% fail on Rbt (65% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.60% fail on Parking brake performance (65% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.047% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.016% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.016% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.016% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.53% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (48% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.53% fail on Rbt (sp) (47% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system (31% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pedal (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.30% fail on Rigid brake pipes (92% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Load sensing valves (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.094% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.063% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.016% fail on Valves
    • 0.17% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.016% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.078% fail on Parking brake control (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Lever (86% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 8.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.7% fail on Transmission (69% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.6% fail on Drive shafts (89% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 6.5% fail on Joints (92% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.13% fail on Prop shafts (75% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Joints
    • 0.91% fail on Exhaust system (39% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Body
      • 0.24% fail on Other body component
      • 0.031% fail on Panel
    • 0.24% fail on Fuel system (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.031% fail on Tank
      • 0.031% fail on Pipe
    • 0.22% fail on Doors (54% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.19% fail on Door condition
      • 0.016% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.016% fail on Hinge
      • 0.016% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.016% fail on Door condition
    • 0.17% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.17% fail on Spare wheel (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Carrier (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.11% fail on Integral vehicle structure (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (85% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.078% fail on Chassis (83% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Chassis condition (83% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.047% fail on Seats (77% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.031% fail on Cabs
      • 0.031% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.031% fail on Passenger compartment (12 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.016% fail on Towbar
      • 0.016% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.016% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.016% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.016% fail on Undertray
  • 7.5% fail on Visibility (13% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Washers
    • 2.4% fail on Wipers (38% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.45% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.047% fail on Window
    • 0.41% fail on View to rear (43% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Mirrors (44% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.094% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.3% fail on Tyres (19% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Tread depth (38% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
  • 6.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.8% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.86% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (62% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.078% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.016% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.016% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 0.91% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.67% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (32% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.72% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.63% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.063% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.047% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.031% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.031% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.031% fail on Sound deadening material (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 3.7% fail on Steering (30% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Steering linkage components (22% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Track rod end (22% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.016% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.16% fail on Steering gear (66% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack (75% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Operation
    • 0.11% fail on Power steering (74% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Operation
      • 0.031% fail on Pipes and hoses (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Other components
      • 0.016% fail on Pump
    • 0.078% fail on Steering play
      • 0.078% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.031% fail on Steering column
  • 1.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (27% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.0% fail on Condition (50% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Prescribed areas (67% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Requirements
      • 0.031% fail on Attachment
    • 0.41% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (54% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.016% fail on Airbags
      • 0.016% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.30% fail on Identification of the vehicle (55% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Registration plates (55% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 0.031% fail on Condition
  • 0.016% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.016% fail on Belt(s)/padding