Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Peugeot Partner MOT Results

Registered in 2010
55.2% pass rate
from 7,034 tests in 2020
(5.9% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (14% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 9.5% fail on Stop lamp (56% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (17% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Position lamps (20% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Position lamp (20% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.071% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.014% fail on Matched pair
    • 2.8% fail on Electrical equipment (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.057% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.34% fail on Side repeaters (60% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.90% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (53% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Rear fog lamp (53% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.88% fail on Rear fog lamp (54% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.028% fail on Switch
    • 0.20% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.20% fail on Switch
    • 0.085% fail on Reversing lamps (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.085% fail on Reversing lamps (86% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.057% fail on Rear reflectors (83% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.057% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.043% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.028% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 6.9% fail on Springs (84% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Coil springs (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 6.8% fail on Coil spring (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.028% fail on Mounting
    • 3.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (28% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.70% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (57% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.043% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.043% fail on Pins and bushes (96% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Suspension arms (35% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint (24% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes (39% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover (43% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.100% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.028% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.37% fail on Wheel bearings (73% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Shock absorbers (67% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.043% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.028% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.028% fail on Axles
      • 0.014% fail on Stub axle
      • 0.014% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.028% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.014% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.014% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.014% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 8.3% fail on Brakes (38% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.3% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.014% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.17% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (59% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Cable
        • 0.014% fail on Lever
    • 2.4% fail on Brake performance (63% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance (67% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.028% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.028% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.014% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.48% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (89% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt (sp) (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Parking brake performance (78% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt (78% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance (79% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.043% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (74% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.014% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.014% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.014% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.34% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (55% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.33% fail on Rbt (sp) (56% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.100% fail on Service brake performance (78% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.014% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.043% fail on Brake performance not tested (74% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (80% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Pedal (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.100% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.88% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.88% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.23% fail on Load sensing valves (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Rigid brake pipes (94% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.14% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.028% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.11% fail on Parking brake control (79% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.100% fail on Lever (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.071% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.057% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.014% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.014% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.014% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
    • 0.014% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.014% fail on Additional braking device
  • 8.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (23% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Transmission (62% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Drive shafts (76% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 5.5% fail on Joints (77% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.028% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.028% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.014% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.13% fail on Prop shafts (65% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Joints
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.45% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.26% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.085% fail on Tank
      • 0.071% fail on Pipe
      • 0.028% fail on Hose
      • 0.014% fail on System
    • 0.44% fail on Body
      • 0.34% fail on Other body component
      • 0.100% fail on Panel
    • 0.33% fail on Doors
      • 0.20% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.18% fail on Door condition
        • 0.014% fail on Catch
      • 0.085% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.071% fail on Door condition
        • 0.014% fail on Catch
      • 0.043% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.043% fail on Door condition
    • 0.11% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.085% fail on Carrier
      • 0.043% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.11% fail on Seats
      • 0.085% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.028% fail on Driver's seat (79% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.100% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.100% fail on Undertray
    • 0.057% fail on Chassis
      • 0.057% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.057% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.043% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.014% fail on Bracket
    • 0.057% fail on Boot lid (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.043% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.014% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.028% fail on Integral vehicle structure (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (86% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.014% fail on Passenger compartment
  • 7.8% fail on Visibility
    • 4.5% fail on Washers (25% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers (30% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.71% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.71% fail on Windscreen (46% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on View to rear
      • 0.54% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.11% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.057% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres (23% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Tread depth (42% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
  • 7.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (25% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (26% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Compression ignition (39% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 5.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.91% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (55% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.071% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.014% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.75% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.55% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (42% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Catalyst emissions (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.028% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.63% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.48% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.071% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.057% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.014% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.014% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.014% fail on Undertray
  • 3.0% fail on Steering (37% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Steering linkage components (32% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Track rod end (31% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.100% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.014% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.014% fail on Other components
        • 0.014% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.20% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.20% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.085% fail on Power steering (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Pipes and hoses (83% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Other components
      • 0.014% fail on Operation
      • 0.014% fail on Rams
    • 0.043% fail on Steering play
      • 0.043% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.028% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.028% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.028% fail on Universal joint
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.0% fail on Condition (56% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.071% fail on Prescribed areas (79% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.071% fail on Requirements
      • 0.028% fail on Attachment
      • 0.014% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.41% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (45% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.028% fail on Airbags
      • 0.014% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.014% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.38% fail on Identification of the vehicle (43% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Registration plates (42% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.085% fail on Attachment
    • 0.057% fail on Condition
  • 0.028% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.028% fail on Anchorages
  • 0.014% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.014% fail on Speedometer