Piaggio Porter MOT Results

Registered in 2006
51.3% pass rate
from 76 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 vans and highlighted areas where the Piaggio Porter is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 9.2% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Tell tale
    • 7.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 7.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.3% fail on Dipswitch
    • 7.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.9% fail on Rear lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Front lamps
    • 5.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.9% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.3% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.6% fail on Horn
    • 1.3% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.3% fail on Lamp
      • 1.3% fail on Tell tale
  • 22% fail on Brakes
    • 20% fail on Brake performance (100% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 13% fail on Service brake performance (11 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 11% fail on Rear wheels
      • 9.2% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 7.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.6% fail on Components
        • 3.9% fail on Pipes
        • 2.6% fail on Hoses
        • 2.6% fail on Valves
      • 1.3% fail on Leaks
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.3% fail on Pedal
        • 1.3% fail on Anti-slip
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (190% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Emissions (5 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.9% fail on Fuel system
      • 2.6% fail on Cap (9 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Tank
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 6.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.9% fail on Spring mounting
      • 1.3% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.3% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 3.9% fail on Leaf springs
      • 3.9% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 3.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.3% fail on Front
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 9.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
  • 3.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.6% fail on Seats (7 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Drivers (13 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis
    • 1.3% fail on Body condition
    • 1.3% fail on Doors
      • 1.3% fail on Passengers other
  • 2.6% fail on Steering
    • 1.3% fail on Steering control
      • 1.3% fail on Steering column
    • 1.3% fail on Steering system
      • 1.3% fail on Steering arm
  • 2.6% fail on Tyres
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate