Renault Master MOT Results

Registered in 1997
39.4% pass rate
from 109 tests in 2021
(38% worse than other 1997 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (72% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 14% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 14% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 7.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (160% worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 5.5% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 0.92% fail on All direction indicators
    • 7.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 6.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 6.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Rear reflectors (8 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.8% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.92% fail on Horn
    • 1.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.8% fail on Switch
    • 0.92% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.92% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 30% fail on Suspension (71% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 17% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.5% fail on Springs
      • 4.6% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.92% fail on Leaf spring
    • 5.5% fail on Suspension rods (64 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Ball joint (97 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.92% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.92% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.92% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.92% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.92% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.92% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.92% fail on Ball joint
  • 28% fail on Brakes (67% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 26% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 20% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 20% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 11% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (110% worse than other 1997 vans)
          • 11% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 7.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 5.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.8% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.92% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.92% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.8% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.8% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.8% fail on Pedal
    • 1.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.92% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.92% fail on Servos
    • 0.92% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.92% fail on Lever
    • 0.92% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.92% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.92% fail on Brake discs
  • 28% fail on Body, chassis, structure (76% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 11% fail on Integral vehicle structure (140% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 11% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (140% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 11% fail on Exhaust system (150% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Chassis
      • 3.7% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.8% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.92% fail on Tank
      • 0.92% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.8% fail on Bumpers (4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Transmission
      • 1.8% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.8% fail on Joints
    • 1.8% fail on Body
      • 1.8% fail on Other body component
    • 1.8% fail on Floor (10 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 0.92% fail on Load security
      • 0.92% fail on Loading door
    • 0.92% fail on Doors
      • 0.92% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.92% fail on Hinge
    • 0.92% fail on Seats
      • 0.92% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.92% fail on Cabs
      • 0.92% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 17% fail on Visibility
    • 11% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Washers
    • 1.8% fail on Bonnet (6 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on View to rear
      • 1.8% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.92% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.92% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.3% fail on Steering
    • 3.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.92% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.92% fail on Other components
        • 0.92% fail on Steering linkage
    • 2.8% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.8% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.92% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.92% fail on Steering play
      • 0.92% fail on Steering rack
  • 5.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.92% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 2.8% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 2.8% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.92% fail on Requirements
  • 0.92% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.92% fail on Attachment
  • 0.92% fail on Tyres
    • 0.92% fail on Condition