MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Renault » Master » 1997
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Renault Master MOT Results

Registered in 1997
44.4% pass rate
from 108 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 35% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (53% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 9.3% fail on Direction indicators (150% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 9.3% fail on Flashing type (150% worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 7.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 3.7% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.93% fail on All direction indicators
    • 9.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 9.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 9.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.93% fail on Switch
    • 8.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 7.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.7% fail on Horn
      • 1.9% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.93% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 5.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.6% fail on Position lamp
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.9% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.9% fail on Switch
  • 31% fail on Suspension (58% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 19% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.6% fail on Springs
      • 5.6% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.6% fail on Ball joint
    • 4.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.93% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.93% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.93% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.93% fail on Ball joint
  • 25% fail on Brakes
    • 21% fail on Brake performance (96% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 16% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 16% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 7.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 7.4% fail on Rbt
          • 6.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.93% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.93% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.93% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 4.6% fail on Load sensing valves (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 0.93% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.93% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.93% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 21% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.4% fail on Fuel system (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (10 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Tank (8 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Hose
      • 0.93% fail on Pipe
      • 0.93% fail on System
    • 6.5% fail on Chassis
      • 6.5% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.93% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 6.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.9% fail on Bumpers (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Transmission
      • 1.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.9% fail on Joints
    • 0.93% fail on Body
      • 0.93% fail on Other body component
    • 0.93% fail on Doors
      • 0.93% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.93% fail on Hinge
  • 16% fail on Visibility
    • 6.5% fail on Washers
    • 5.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on View to rear (4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Mirrors (4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Driver's view (7 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Bonnet
  • 3.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plates (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
  • 3.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.9% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 1.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.93% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.93% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.93% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.93% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
  • 1.9% fail on Steering
    • 1.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.93% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.93% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.93% fail on Steering play
      • 0.93% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas