Renault Master MOT Results
Registered in 199947.8% pass rate
from 686 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Suspension
(29% worse than other 1999 vans)
-
16% fail on
Prescribed areas
(45% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 8.6% fail on Spring mounting (120% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 7.1% fail on Component mounting
- 3.5% fail on Subframe mounting (86% worse than other 1999 vans)
-
8.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(130% worse than other 1999 vans)
-
8.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
(130% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 8.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.15% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.15% fail on Drive shafts
-
8.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
(130% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 4.5% fail on Front suspension joints (98% worse than other 1999 vans)
-
4.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
4.1% fail on
Wheel bearings
(100% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 3.9% fail on Front (160% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 0.44% fail on Rear
-
3.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
(80% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 3.2% fail on Condition (80% worse than other 1999 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.58% fail on Anchor bracket (7 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 0.44% fail on Shackle bracket (9 times worse than other 1999 vans)
-
0.29% fail on
Pins and bushes
- 0.15% fail on Shackle
- 0.15% fail on Anchor
- 0.15% fail on Condition
-
1.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(55% better than other 1999 vans)
- 0.87% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
-
0.58% fail on
Air suspension
(34 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 0.29% fail on Operation (34 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Suspension unit
- 0.15% fail on Other components
-
0.15% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.15% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.15% fail on Condition
- 0.15% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
16% fail on
Prescribed areas
(45% worse than other 1999 vans)
-
28% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 7.6% fail on Headlamp aim
-
7.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.4% fail on Rear lamps (63% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 3.5% fail on Front lamps
-
5.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 5.4% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.15% fail on Tell tale
- 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
- 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (41% better than other 1999 vans)
- 4.2% fail on Battery (67% worse than other 1999 vans)
-
3.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.3% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.73% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.44% fail on Side repeaters
-
3.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp
- 0.15% fail on Switch
- 1.0% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.58% fail on Horn (77% better than other 1999 vans)
- 0.29% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.15% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.15% fail on Lamp
- 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
26% fail on
Brakes
(31% worse than other 1999 vans)
-
19% fail on
Brake performance
(53% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 8.3% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 8.3% fail on Parking brake performance (73% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 6.9% fail on Rear wheels
- 5.7% fail on Front wheels
- 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.44% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
11% fail on
Components
- 5.7% fail on Valves (140% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 3.5% fail on Pipes
- 2.9% fail on Hoses
- 0.15% fail on Reservoirs
-
11% fail on
Components
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.5% fail on Condition
-
1.3% fail on
Mechanical components
- 1.3% fail on Cable (140% worse than other 1999 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake control components
-
1.2% fail on
Pedal
- 1.0% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.15% fail on Condition
-
1.2% fail on
Pedal
-
1.0% fail on
Hub components
- 0.44% fail on Brake pads
- 0.29% fail on Brake discs
- 0.15% fail on Brake drums
- 0.15% fail on Brake calipers
-
0.73% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.73% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 0.44% fail on ABS
- 0.44% fail on Restricted movement
-
19% fail on
Brake performance
(53% worse than other 1999 vans)
-
16% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(45% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 11% fail on Washers (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 6.7% fail on Wipers
- 0.44% fail on Bonnet
- 0.44% fail on Mirrors
- 0.15% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
0.15% fail on
Glazing
- 0.15% fail on Windows
- 0.15% fail on Windscreen
-
10% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 8.7% fail on Exhaust system (50% worse than other 1999 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.87% fail on System
- 0.15% fail on Tank
- 0.15% fail on Cap
- 0.87% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.15% fail on Emissions
-
8.7% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 5.1% fail on Body condition
-
1.9% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.9% fail on Chassis
-
1.3% fail on
Doors
- 0.58% fail on Passengers other
- 0.29% fail on Passengers front
- 0.15% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors (Class 5)
- 0.15% fail on Emergency exits
- 0.15% fail on Drivers
-
0.44% fail on
Seats
- 0.29% fail on Passengers
- 0.29% fail on Drivers
- 0.29% fail on Body security
- 0.15% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.15% fail on
Steps and stairs
- 0.15% fail on Retractable steps
-
0.15% fail on
Load security
- 0.15% fail on Tailgate
-
8.2% fail on
Steering
-
7.7% fail on
Steering system
- 6.3% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Track rod end (57% better than other 1999 vans)
- 0.73% fail on Ball joint
-
0.44% fail on
Free play
- 0.44% fail on Steering rack
- 0.15% fail on Steering arm
-
0.44% fail on
Power steering
- 0.15% fail on Operation
- 0.15% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.15% fail on Other components
-
0.29% fail on
Steering control
-
0.29% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.29% fail on Universal joint
-
0.29% fail on
Steering coupling
-
7.7% fail on
Steering system
-
5.0% fail on
Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 2.2% fail on Tread depth
- 0.44% fail on Size/type
- 0.29% fail on Valve stem
-
3.8% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.5% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.0% fail on Condition
- 0.15% fail on Requirements
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
-
0.29% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.29% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
3.5% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.0% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.0% fail on Registration plate
-
0.58% fail on
Towbars
- 0.44% fail on Vehicle structure
- 0.15% fail on Towbar