MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Renault » Master » 1999
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Renault Master MOT Results

Registered in 1999
47.8% pass rate
from 686 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Suspension (29% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 16% fail on Prescribed areas (45% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 8.6% fail on Spring mounting (120% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 7.1% fail on Component mounting
      • 3.5% fail on Subframe mounting (86% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 8.6% fail on Drive shafts (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 8.5% fail on Front drive shafts (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 8.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.15% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.15% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.5% fail on Front suspension joints (98% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 4.1% fail on Wheel bearings (100% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Front (160% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Rear
    • 3.2% fail on Shock absorbers (80% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Condition (80% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.58% fail on Anchor bracket (7 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Shackle bracket (9 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.15% fail on Shackle
        • 0.15% fail on Anchor
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (55% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
    • 0.58% fail on Air suspension (34 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Operation (34 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Suspension unit
      • 0.15% fail on Other components
    • 0.15% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.15% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 7.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.4% fail on Rear lamps (63% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Front lamps
    • 5.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 5.4% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.15% fail on Tell tale
    • 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (41% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Battery (67% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.3% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.73% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.44% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.15% fail on Switch
    • 1.0% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.58% fail on Horn (77% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.15% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.15% fail on Lamp
    • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 26% fail on Brakes (31% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (53% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 8.3% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 8.3% fail on Parking brake performance (73% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 5.7% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.44% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 11% fail on Components
        • 5.7% fail on Valves (140% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Pipes
        • 2.9% fail on Hoses
        • 0.15% fail on Reservoirs
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical components
      • 1.3% fail on Cable (140% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal
        • 1.0% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.15% fail on Condition
    • 1.0% fail on Hub components
      • 0.44% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.29% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.15% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.15% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.73% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.73% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on ABS
    • 0.44% fail on Restricted movement
  • 16% fail on Driver's view of the road (45% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 11% fail on Washers (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 6.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.44% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.44% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.15% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.15% fail on Glazing
      • 0.15% fail on Windows
    • 0.15% fail on Windscreen
  • 10% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.7% fail on Exhaust system (50% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.87% fail on System
      • 0.15% fail on Tank
      • 0.15% fail on Cap
    • 0.87% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.15% fail on Emissions
  • 8.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 5.1% fail on Body condition
    • 1.9% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.9% fail on Chassis
    • 1.3% fail on Doors
      • 0.58% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.29% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.15% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors (Class 5)
      • 0.15% fail on Emergency exits
      • 0.15% fail on Drivers
    • 0.44% fail on Seats
      • 0.29% fail on Passengers
      • 0.29% fail on Drivers
    • 0.29% fail on Body security
    • 0.15% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.15% fail on Steps and stairs
      • 0.15% fail on Retractable steps
    • 0.15% fail on Load security
      • 0.15% fail on Tailgate
  • 8.2% fail on Steering
    • 7.7% fail on Steering system
      • 6.3% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end (57% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.44% fail on Free play
        • 0.44% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.15% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.44% fail on Power steering
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
      • 0.15% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.15% fail on Other components
    • 0.29% fail on Steering control
      • 0.29% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.29% fail on Universal joint
  • 5.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.44% fail on Size/type
    • 0.29% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Requirements
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
    • 0.29% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.29% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.58% fail on Towbars
    • 0.44% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.15% fail on Towbar