MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Renault » Master » 2000

Renault Master MOT Results

Registered in 2000
48.6% pass rate
from 697 tests in 2021
(11% worse than other 2000 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Brakes (42% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 20% fail on Brake performance (64% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 10% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (75% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (sp) (74% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 8.5% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 4.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 6.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.6% fail on Rbt
          • 5.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.14% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.14% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.29% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.14% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.0% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.5% fail on Load sensing valves (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.14% fail on Brake drums
      • 1.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.86% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.72% fail on Cable
        • 0.14% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 1.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.29% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.14% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.14% fail on Valves
    • 0.43% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.43% fail on Lever
    • 0.43% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.29% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.43% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.43% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.14% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
    • 0.14% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 8.3% fail on Suspension arms (72% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 4.2% fail on Wheel bearings (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Springs
      • 1.6% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.72% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.29% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.14% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.14% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.14% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.57% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 1.3% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.14% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.72% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.57% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.29% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.29% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover (30 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (14 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
      • 0.14% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.14% fail on Axles
      • 0.14% fail on Axle
  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.43% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.14% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.14% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.9% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 1.6% fail on Horn
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps (48% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp (53% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.1% fail on Rear reflectors (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.72% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.72% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.14% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.14% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.14% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.14% fail on Switch
  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (24% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure (79% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (81% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 5.6% fail on Transmission
      • 5.2% fail on Drive shafts (66% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 5.0% fail on Joints (66% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.57% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.57% fail on Joints
    • 3.0% fail on Chassis
      • 3.0% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.4% fail on Doors
      • 0.57% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.57% fail on Door condition
      • 0.57% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.57% fail on Door condition
      • 0.43% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.43% fail on Door condition
    • 0.86% fail on Body
      • 0.57% fail on Panel
      • 0.29% fail on Other body component
    • 0.72% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.43% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.14% fail on Tank
      • 0.14% fail on Pipe
    • 0.29% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.29% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.29% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.14% fail on Load security
      • 0.14% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.14% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.14% fail on Seats
      • 0.14% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.14% fail on Cabs
      • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 18% fail on Visibility (71% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 12% fail on Washers (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.86% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on View to rear
      • 0.86% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.43% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.43% fail on Windscreen
  • 12% fail on Steering (85% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 11% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 11% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components (70% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Track rod end (74% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Other components
        • 0.14% fail on Steering component
    • 0.57% fail on Steering play
      • 0.57% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Power steering
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
      • 0.14% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.29% fail on Steering wheel
  • 4.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.86% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.14% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.14% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.14% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 1.9% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.6% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.14% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.72% fail on Size/type
  • 3.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment
      • 0.14% fail on Requirements
    • 0.72% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.14% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.14% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.14% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.14% fail on Anchorages