Renault Master MOT Results

Registered in 2000
49.0% pass rate
from 677 tests in 2020
(11% worse than other 2000 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Suspension (25% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (33% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Suspension arms (30% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Ball joint (56% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Wheel bearings (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Springs (23% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Leaf springs (48% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Shackle bracket (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Anchor bracket (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.15% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.15% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 2.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (16% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (8.8% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes (1.4% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage
    • 1.2% fail on Other suspension component (39% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint (16% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers (5.3% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.89% fail on Sub-frames (8.7% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (8.8% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (24 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Bellows (21 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
      • 0.15% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.15% fail on Axles
      • 0.15% fail on Axle
  • 22% fail on Brakes (26% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (56% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 9.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (89% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 9.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (89% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 7.7% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 4.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (68% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 9.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 9.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 7.1% fail on Service brake performance (42% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt (40% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 5.9% fail on Service brake performance (51% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (25% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Plate brake tester (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance (72% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (77% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance (87% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.15% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.74% fail on Brake performance not tested (44% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Load sensing valves (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (36% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (39% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Brake discs and drums (17% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.74% fail on Brake discs (27% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.59% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (22% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Cable (29% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Pivot
      • 0.30% fail on Brake linings and pads (78% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Brake pads (78% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.89% fail on Flexible brake hoses (64% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.74% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (41% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Pedal (70% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Parking brake control (2.2% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Lever (3.3% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic systems (13% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.15% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.30% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (10% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Other components (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
    • 0.15% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.15% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.15% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (1.6% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp (4.5% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim (5.5% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim (1.4% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (5.4% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (5.4% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 4.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (3.8% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Switch
    • 4.1% fail on Electrical equipment (10% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Battery(ies) (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Horn (45% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Electrical wiring (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Direction indicators (15% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Flashing type (15% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.2% fail on Individual direction indicators (38% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.59% fail on Side repeaters (31% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (13% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps (54% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp (57% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Headlamp levelling device (22% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.89% fail on Rear reflectors (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Position lamps (17% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Position lamp (15% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Outline marker lamps (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Outline marker lamp (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (25% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Exhaust system (59% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure (40% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (41% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Transmission (19% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Drive shafts (56% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 4.6% fail on Joints (55% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Drive shaft
    • 4.0% fail on Chassis (36% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Chassis condition (33% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 1.2% fail on Body (17% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Panel (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Other body component (1.7% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Doors (39% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Driver's door (57% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Door condition (9.9% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Catch
      • 0.44% fail on Other passenger's door (97% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Door condition (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Front passenger's door (24% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Door condition (23% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Fuel system (44% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (4.0% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Pipe
    • 0.44% fail on Bumpers (68% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Towbar (15% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Other towbar components (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.44% fail on Seats (11% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Passenger's seat (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Load security
      • 0.15% fail on Loading door
    • 0.15% fail on Floor
    • 0.15% fail on Cabs
      • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 14% fail on Visibility (50% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 10% fail on Washers (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers (11% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.59% fail on Bonnet (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on View to rear (12% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Mirrors (11% better than other 2000 vans)
  • 9.9% fail on Steering (56% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Steering linkage components (45% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end (43% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint (1.7% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.74% fail on Steering play (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.59% fail on Power steering (18% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Operation (73% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Other components (45% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Pump
  • 3.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (26% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (48% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Compression ignition (29% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested (36% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.59% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (42% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.15% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.15% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.15% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 1.9% fail on Fluid leaks (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Engine oil leaks (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 3.5% fail on Tyres (28% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Condition (17% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth (58% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.74% fail on Size/type (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 2.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (38% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Seat belts (30% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas (39% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Condition (2.2% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Requirements (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 1.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle (20% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plates (24% worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 0.15% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.15% fail on Doors
      • 0.15% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors