Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Renault Master MOT Results

Registered in 2005
53.0% pass rate
from 3,403 tests in 2020
(4.6% better than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Brakes (40% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 21% fail on Brake performance (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 19% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 18% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Parking brake performance (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 6.1% fail on Rbt (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 5.5% fail on Parking brake performance (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.53% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.15% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.12% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.029% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt
          • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance (25% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.68% fail on Service brake imbalance (41% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.029% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance (89% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.79% fail on Service brake imbalance (51% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Brake performance not tested (81% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (78% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (72% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Brake pads (75% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Brake discs and drums (95% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on Brake discs (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.68% fail on Cable
        • 0.56% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Linkage (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on Pivot
        • 0.029% fail on Relay lever
    • 3.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (38% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake control (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Lever (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.41% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.41% fail on Pedal
    • 0.41% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.088% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.059% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.029% fail on Valves
    • 0.12% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.029% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp (20% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp (27% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Headlamp levelling device (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.56% fail on Side repeaters (44% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.029% fail on Switch
    • 3.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.15% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.12% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Hazard warning (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.1% fail on Horn
      • 0.29% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.12% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.029% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (50% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (46% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (46% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (45% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.88% fail on Rear reflectors (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.32% fail on Outline marker lamp
      • 0.088% fail on All outline marker lamps
    • 0.059% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.029% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.029% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 14% fail on Suspension (33% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.4% fail on Ball joint (28% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (71% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes (93% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Wheel bearings (56% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (60% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.24% fail on Anti-roll bar (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.059% fail on Linkage (86% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.029% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.029% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.73% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.97% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (80% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.94% fail on Springs (75% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.38% fail on Shackle bracket (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Anchor bracket (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.029% fail on Spring saddle
        • 0.029% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.029% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 0.24% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (60% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Coil springs (98% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on Coil spring (97% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.41% fail on Shock absorbers (77% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Sub-frames (79% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (69% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (13 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.088% fail on Bellows (35 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Operation
      • 0.029% fail on Accumulator
    • 0.029% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint
  • 9.6% fail on Visibility
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers
    • 4.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.59% fail on Bonnet (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on View to rear
      • 0.50% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.029% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.44% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.44% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.29% fail on Driver's view
  • 8.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (33% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Transmission
      • 3.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.4% fail on Joints
        • 0.029% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.18% fail on Prop shafts (80% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Joints
      • 0.029% fail on Belts
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust system (37% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Doors (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Driver's door (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.71% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Catch
      • 0.62% fail on Front passenger's door (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.62% fail on Door condition (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition
    • 0.62% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.47% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.088% fail on System
      • 0.029% fail on Tank
      • 0.029% fail on Pipe
    • 0.56% fail on Body
      • 0.32% fail on Other body component
      • 0.18% fail on Panel
      • 0.029% fail on Body condition
      • 0.029% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.47% fail on Integral vehicle structure (75% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (75% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Chassis (84% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Chassis condition (84% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.088% fail on Bracket
    • 0.21% fail on Seats
      • 0.12% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.088% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.15% fail on Bumpers (68% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Undertray (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Load security
      • 0.088% fail on Loading door
      • 0.029% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.029% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.088% fail on Towbar
      • 0.088% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.059% fail on Floor
    • 0.029% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.029% fail on Carrier
    • 0.029% fail on Cabs
      • 0.029% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.029% fail on Passenger compartment
  • 7.1% fail on Steering
    • 3.8% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Operation
    • 1.7% fail on Power steering (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Operation (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Pipes and hoses (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Rams (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Pump
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components (64% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end (69% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.088% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.088% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.029% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.029% fail on Other components
        • 0.029% fail on Steering component
    • 0.35% fail on Steering play
      • 0.35% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.12% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.12% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.088% fail on Steering column
    • 0.029% fail on Steering wheel
  • 5.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (84% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Seat belts (42% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Condition (70% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas (91% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Requirements
      • 0.059% fail on Attachment
    • 0.15% fail on Airbags
      • 0.15% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres (36% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth (49% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Condition (28% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Size/type
  • 2.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (58% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (66% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Compression ignition (64% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.76% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (68% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (68% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.18% fail on Spark ignition (77% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.088% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (83% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.029% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.82% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.50% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.088% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 0.85% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.85% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.088% fail on Road Wheels (76% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.059% fail on Attachment (80% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.029% fail on Condition
  • 0.059% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.059% fail on Steps and stairs
      • 0.059% fail on Retractable steps (18 times worse than other 2005 vans)
  • 0.029% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.029% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.029% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.029% fail on Belt(s)/padding