Renault Master MOT Results

Registered in 2016
70.0% pass rate
from 6,435 tests in 2020
(23% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (67% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim (32% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (20% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Direction indicators (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Flashing type (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Side repeaters (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.87% fail on Individual direction indicators (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.078% fail on All direction indicators (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp (31% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (99% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (99% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Position lamps (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Position lamp (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Rear reflectors (90% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Electrical equipment (4.8% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Horn (6.8% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.093% fail on Electrical wiring (93% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Trailer electrical socket (64% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Reversing lamps (57% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Reversing lamps (60% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.078% fail on Outline marker lamps (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Outline marker lamp (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.016% fail on Daytime running lamps
    • 0.016% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.016% fail on Switch
  • 8.6% fail on Brakes (48% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.67% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.031% fail on Plate brake tester (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.031% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (200% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Parking brake performance (75% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.64% fail on Rbt (81% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.54% fail on Parking brake performance (81% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.093% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake imbalance (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Brake performance not tested (1.0% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (30% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (30% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Brake pads (28% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.062% fail on Brake linings (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums (39% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs (40% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (200% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Cable (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.031% fail on Lever (28% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.031% fail on Linkage (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (11% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Anti-lock braking system (1.8% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Electronic stability control (23% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3.7% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Pedal (14% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Hand lever (47% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Flexible brake hoses (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Parking brake control (42% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Lever (42% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Rigid brake pipes (17% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.078% fail on Hydraulic systems (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Brake fluid (91% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Servos
      • 0.016% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.016% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.016% fail on Leaks
  • 6.3% fail on Visibility (26% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Washers (52% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers (5.6% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.79% fail on Condition of glass (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Windscreen (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on View to rear (48% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Mirrors (47% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.17% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.047% fail on Driver's view (26% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres (8.2% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth (6.8% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Condition (11% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type (25% worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 3.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Transmission (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Joints (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.016% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.22% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.093% fail on Flexible couplings (33 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.64% fail on Body (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Other body component (63% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Panel (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Seats (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Driver's seat (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Passenger's seat (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Fuel system (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.093% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Bumpers (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Doors (85% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Driver's door (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.078% fail on Door condition (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.031% fail on Hinge (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.062% fail on Other passenger's door (57% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.062% fail on Door condition (82% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Front passenger's door (15% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.031% fail on Door condition (17% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Hinge
    • 0.12% fail on Exhaust system (27% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.047% fail on Undertray (67% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.031% fail on Load security (72% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Loading door (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.016% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.016% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.016% fail on Floor
    • 0.016% fail on Cabs
      • 0.016% fail on Steps
  • 2.5% fail on Suspension (23% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms (39% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover (54% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.062% fail on Pins and bushes (76% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.53% fail on Anti-roll bars (34% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage ball joints (41% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes (4.2% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Ball joint dust cover (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.062% fail on Linkage (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.062% fail on Ball joint (9.0% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (82% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.42% fail on Shock absorbers (35% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.062% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Wheel bearings (85% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.062% fail on Springs (94% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Leaf springs (77% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.016% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 0.031% fail on Coil springs (96% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.031% fail on Coil spring (96% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.031% fail on Macpherson strut (39% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.016% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.016% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.016% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.016% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint
  • 2.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (22% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (28% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Compression ignition (29% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (57% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.093% fail on Emissions not tested (43% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.062% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (70% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.016% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 0.47% fail on Spark ignition (25% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (29% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.031% fail on Noise suppression (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Undertray (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.031% fail on Fluid leaks (71% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.016% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 0.56% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (26% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Seat belts (46% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Condition (45% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Attachment
    • 0.28% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (17% worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.36% fail on Steering (36% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.093% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Operation (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Power steering (14% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Pipes and hoses (63% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Other components (11% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.078% fail on Steering linkage components (78% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Ball joint (56% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Track rod end (90% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.016% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.016% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.016% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.25% fail on Identification of the vehicle (14% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Registration plates (13% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.093% fail on Road Wheels (27% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.062% fail on Attachment (25% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.031% fail on Condition (32% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.016% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.016% fail on Speedometer